{"title":"1例女性RHD*09.01.02和新型RHD*01W的输血支持。161个反式等位基因。","authors":"K Srivastava, M U Bueno, W A Flegel","doi":"10.21307/immunohematology-2022-036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to recent work group recommendations, individuals with the serologic weak D phenotypes should be <i>RHD</i> genotyped and individuals with molecular weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, or 4.1 should be treated as D+. We report an African American woman with a long-standing history of metrorrhagia, who presented for infertility evaluation. Blood grouping showed AB with a possible subgroup of A, based on mixed-field agglutination, and a serologic weak D phenotype. Results from routine red cell genotyping for the <i>RHD</i> gene was incongruent with the serologic RhCE phenotype. For the surgical procedure, the patient was hence scheduled to receive group AB, D- RBC transfusions. Subsequent molecular analysis identified the <i>ABO*A2.01</i> and <i>ABO*B.01</i> alleles for the <i>ABO</i> genotype and the novel <i>RHD</i> allele [<i>NG_007494.1(RHD):c.611T>A</i>] along with an <i>RHD*09.01.02</i> allele for the <i>RHD</i> genotype. Using a panel of monoclonal anti-D reagents, we showed the novel <i>RHD(I204K)</i> allele to represent a serologic weak D phenotype, despite occurring as a compound heterozygote, designated <i>RHD*weak D type 161</i> (<i>RHD*01W.161</i>). Individuals with a <i>weak D type 4.2</i> allele are prone to anti-D immunization, while the immunization potential of novel <i>RHD</i> alleles is difficult to predict. For now, patients should be treated as D- in transfusion and pregnancy management, when they harbor a novel <i>RHD</i> allele along with any <i>weak D</i> allele other than <i>weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0</i>, or <i>4.1</i>. This study exemplifies strategies for how and when a laboratory should proceed from routine genotyping to nucleotide sequencing before any decisions on transfusion practice is made.</p>","PeriodicalId":13357,"journal":{"name":"Immunohematology","volume":"38 1","pages":"17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364384/pdf/nihms-1795193.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transfusion support for a woman with <i>RHD*09.01.02</i> and the novel <i>RHD*01W.161</i> allele <i>in trans</i>.\",\"authors\":\"K Srivastava, M U Bueno, W A Flegel\",\"doi\":\"10.21307/immunohematology-2022-036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>According to recent work group recommendations, individuals with the serologic weak D phenotypes should be <i>RHD</i> genotyped and individuals with molecular weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, or 4.1 should be treated as D+. We report an African American woman with a long-standing history of metrorrhagia, who presented for infertility evaluation. Blood grouping showed AB with a possible subgroup of A, based on mixed-field agglutination, and a serologic weak D phenotype. Results from routine red cell genotyping for the <i>RHD</i> gene was incongruent with the serologic RhCE phenotype. For the surgical procedure, the patient was hence scheduled to receive group AB, D- RBC transfusions. Subsequent molecular analysis identified the <i>ABO*A2.01</i> and <i>ABO*B.01</i> alleles for the <i>ABO</i> genotype and the novel <i>RHD</i> allele [<i>NG_007494.1(RHD):c.611T>A</i>] along with an <i>RHD*09.01.02</i> allele for the <i>RHD</i> genotype. Using a panel of monoclonal anti-D reagents, we showed the novel <i>RHD(I204K)</i> allele to represent a serologic weak D phenotype, despite occurring as a compound heterozygote, designated <i>RHD*weak D type 161</i> (<i>RHD*01W.161</i>). Individuals with a <i>weak D type 4.2</i> allele are prone to anti-D immunization, while the immunization potential of novel <i>RHD</i> alleles is difficult to predict. For now, patients should be treated as D- in transfusion and pregnancy management, when they harbor a novel <i>RHD</i> allele along with any <i>weak D</i> allele other than <i>weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0</i>, or <i>4.1</i>. This study exemplifies strategies for how and when a laboratory should proceed from routine genotyping to nucleotide sequencing before any decisions on transfusion practice is made.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunohematology\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"17-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364384/pdf/nihms-1795193.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunohematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2022-036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunohematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2022-036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Transfusion support for a woman with RHD*09.01.02 and the novel RHD*01W.161 allele in trans.
According to recent work group recommendations, individuals with the serologic weak D phenotypes should be RHD genotyped and individuals with molecular weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, or 4.1 should be treated as D+. We report an African American woman with a long-standing history of metrorrhagia, who presented for infertility evaluation. Blood grouping showed AB with a possible subgroup of A, based on mixed-field agglutination, and a serologic weak D phenotype. Results from routine red cell genotyping for the RHD gene was incongruent with the serologic RhCE phenotype. For the surgical procedure, the patient was hence scheduled to receive group AB, D- RBC transfusions. Subsequent molecular analysis identified the ABO*A2.01 and ABO*B.01 alleles for the ABO genotype and the novel RHD allele [NG_007494.1(RHD):c.611T>A] along with an RHD*09.01.02 allele for the RHD genotype. Using a panel of monoclonal anti-D reagents, we showed the novel RHD(I204K) allele to represent a serologic weak D phenotype, despite occurring as a compound heterozygote, designated RHD*weak D type 161 (RHD*01W.161). Individuals with a weak D type 4.2 allele are prone to anti-D immunization, while the immunization potential of novel RHD alleles is difficult to predict. For now, patients should be treated as D- in transfusion and pregnancy management, when they harbor a novel RHD allele along with any weak D allele other than weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, or 4.1. This study exemplifies strategies for how and when a laboratory should proceed from routine genotyping to nucleotide sequencing before any decisions on transfusion practice is made.