1例女性RHD*09.01.02和新型RHD*01W的输血支持。161个反式等位基因。

Q4 Medicine Immunohematology Pub Date : 2022-04-29 DOI:10.21307/immunohematology-2022-036
K Srivastava, M U Bueno, W A Flegel
{"title":"1例女性RHD*09.01.02和新型RHD*01W的输血支持。161个反式等位基因。","authors":"K Srivastava,&nbsp;M U Bueno,&nbsp;W A Flegel","doi":"10.21307/immunohematology-2022-036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to recent work group recommendations, individuals with the serologic weak D phenotypes should be <i>RHD</i> genotyped and individuals with molecular weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, or 4.1 should be treated as D+. We report an African American woman with a long-standing history of metrorrhagia, who presented for infertility evaluation. Blood grouping showed AB with a possible subgroup of A, based on mixed-field agglutination, and a serologic weak D phenotype. Results from routine red cell genotyping for the <i>RHD</i> gene was incongruent with the serologic RhCE phenotype. For the surgical procedure, the patient was hence scheduled to receive group AB, D- RBC transfusions. Subsequent molecular analysis identified the <i>ABO*A2.01</i> and <i>ABO*B.01</i> alleles for the <i>ABO</i> genotype and the novel <i>RHD</i> allele [<i>NG_007494.1(RHD):c.611T>A</i>] along with an <i>RHD*09.01.02</i> allele for the <i>RHD</i> genotype. Using a panel of monoclonal anti-D reagents, we showed the novel <i>RHD(I204K)</i> allele to represent a serologic weak D phenotype, despite occurring as a compound heterozygote, designated <i>RHD*weak D type 161</i> (<i>RHD*01W.161</i>). Individuals with a <i>weak D type 4.2</i> allele are prone to anti-D immunization, while the immunization potential of novel <i>RHD</i> alleles is difficult to predict. For now, patients should be treated as D- in transfusion and pregnancy management, when they harbor a novel <i>RHD</i> allele along with any <i>weak D</i> allele other than <i>weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0</i>, or <i>4.1</i>. This study exemplifies strategies for how and when a laboratory should proceed from routine genotyping to nucleotide sequencing before any decisions on transfusion practice is made.</p>","PeriodicalId":13357,"journal":{"name":"Immunohematology","volume":"38 1","pages":"17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364384/pdf/nihms-1795193.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transfusion support for a woman with <i>RHD*09.01.02</i> and the novel <i>RHD*01W.161</i> allele <i>in trans</i>.\",\"authors\":\"K Srivastava,&nbsp;M U Bueno,&nbsp;W A Flegel\",\"doi\":\"10.21307/immunohematology-2022-036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>According to recent work group recommendations, individuals with the serologic weak D phenotypes should be <i>RHD</i> genotyped and individuals with molecular weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, or 4.1 should be treated as D+. We report an African American woman with a long-standing history of metrorrhagia, who presented for infertility evaluation. Blood grouping showed AB with a possible subgroup of A, based on mixed-field agglutination, and a serologic weak D phenotype. Results from routine red cell genotyping for the <i>RHD</i> gene was incongruent with the serologic RhCE phenotype. For the surgical procedure, the patient was hence scheduled to receive group AB, D- RBC transfusions. Subsequent molecular analysis identified the <i>ABO*A2.01</i> and <i>ABO*B.01</i> alleles for the <i>ABO</i> genotype and the novel <i>RHD</i> allele [<i>NG_007494.1(RHD):c.611T>A</i>] along with an <i>RHD*09.01.02</i> allele for the <i>RHD</i> genotype. Using a panel of monoclonal anti-D reagents, we showed the novel <i>RHD(I204K)</i> allele to represent a serologic weak D phenotype, despite occurring as a compound heterozygote, designated <i>RHD*weak D type 161</i> (<i>RHD*01W.161</i>). Individuals with a <i>weak D type 4.2</i> allele are prone to anti-D immunization, while the immunization potential of novel <i>RHD</i> alleles is difficult to predict. For now, patients should be treated as D- in transfusion and pregnancy management, when they harbor a novel <i>RHD</i> allele along with any <i>weak D</i> allele other than <i>weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0</i>, or <i>4.1</i>. This study exemplifies strategies for how and when a laboratory should proceed from routine genotyping to nucleotide sequencing before any decisions on transfusion practice is made.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunohematology\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"17-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364384/pdf/nihms-1795193.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunohematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2022-036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunohematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2022-036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

根据最近工作组的建议,血清学弱D表型的个体应被视为RHD基因型,分子弱D型1、2、3、4.0或4.1的个体应被视为D+。我们报告一个非洲裔美国妇女与长期历史的子宫出血,谁提出了不孕症的评估。根据混合场凝集,血型显示AB和可能的a亚群,血清学弱D表型。常规红细胞RHD基因分型结果与血清学RhCE表型不一致。因此,在手术过程中,患者被安排接受AB、D组红细胞输血。随后的分子分析鉴定出ABO*A2.01和ABO*B。ABO基因型的01个等位基因和新的RHD等位基因[NG_007494.1(RHD)];611T>A]与RHD基因型的RHD*09.01.02等位基因。使用一组单克隆抗D试剂,我们发现新的RHD(I204K)等位基因代表血清学弱D表型,尽管它是一个复合杂合子,命名为RHD*弱D型161 (RHD*01W.161)。弱D型4.2等位基因的个体容易产生抗D免疫,而新型RHD等位基因的免疫潜力难以预测。目前,当患者携带一种新的RHD等位基因以及除弱D型1、2、3、4.0或4.1以外的弱D等位基因时,应接受D- in输血和妊娠管理。这项研究举例说明了实验室在做出任何输血实践决定之前,应该如何以及何时从常规基因分型转向核苷酸测序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transfusion support for a woman with RHD*09.01.02 and the novel RHD*01W.161 allele in trans.

According to recent work group recommendations, individuals with the serologic weak D phenotypes should be RHD genotyped and individuals with molecular weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, or 4.1 should be treated as D+. We report an African American woman with a long-standing history of metrorrhagia, who presented for infertility evaluation. Blood grouping showed AB with a possible subgroup of A, based on mixed-field agglutination, and a serologic weak D phenotype. Results from routine red cell genotyping for the RHD gene was incongruent with the serologic RhCE phenotype. For the surgical procedure, the patient was hence scheduled to receive group AB, D- RBC transfusions. Subsequent molecular analysis identified the ABO*A2.01 and ABO*B.01 alleles for the ABO genotype and the novel RHD allele [NG_007494.1(RHD):c.611T>A] along with an RHD*09.01.02 allele for the RHD genotype. Using a panel of monoclonal anti-D reagents, we showed the novel RHD(I204K) allele to represent a serologic weak D phenotype, despite occurring as a compound heterozygote, designated RHD*weak D type 161 (RHD*01W.161). Individuals with a weak D type 4.2 allele are prone to anti-D immunization, while the immunization potential of novel RHD alleles is difficult to predict. For now, patients should be treated as D- in transfusion and pregnancy management, when they harbor a novel RHD allele along with any weak D allele other than weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, or 4.1. This study exemplifies strategies for how and when a laboratory should proceed from routine genotyping to nucleotide sequencing before any decisions on transfusion practice is made.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immunohematology
Immunohematology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
A challenging case of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to anti-Ku in a K0 (Kellnull) mother. Mixed-field ABO front typing as an early sign of disease recurrence in ABO-matched stem cell transplantation. Red blood cell extended antigen typing in Omani patients with sickle cell disease to enhance daily transfusion practice. The American Rare Donor Program: 25 years supporting rare blood needs. Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1