在基于团队的混合生物工程实验课程中培养社区和包容性。

Biomedical engineering education Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-11 DOI:10.1007/s43683-022-00081-4
Alyssa C Taylor, Jamie L Hernandez
{"title":"在基于团队的混合生物工程实验课程中培养社区和包容性。","authors":"Alyssa C Taylor, Jamie L Hernandez","doi":"10.1007/s43683-022-00081-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As cornerstones of biomedical engineering and bioengineering undergraduate programs, hands-on laboratory experiences promote key skill development and student engagement. Lab courses often involve team-based activities and close communication with instructors, allowing students to build connection and community. Necessitated by the pandemic, changes to class delivery format presented unprecedented challenges to student inclusion and engagement, especially for students from underrepresented minority backgrounds. Here, we present a multi-faceted approach for fostering inclusion and community-building in a hybrid bioengineering laboratory course. A basis for this project was an approach for team-based project work which allowed students to have hands-on experience in the lab and collaborate extensively with peers, while abiding by social distancing guidelines. Members of each student team worked together remotely and synchronously on a project. One team member executed the hands-on portion of each lab activity and the remote student(s) engaged in the project via online communication. The hybrid lab course was supplemented with interventions to further promote inclusivity and community, including instructor modeling on inclusion, team-based course content, attention to lab session logistics, and instructor communication. Students responded positively, as indicated by the median ratings in course evaluations for the four lab sections in the following categories concerning course climate (using a 5.0 scale): their overall comfort with the climate of the course (4.8 to 5.0), feeling valued and respected by lab instructor (4.8 to 5.0) and their peers (4.8 to 5.0), peers helping each other succeed in the course (4.5 to 5.0), and the degree to which the experience in the course contributed to their sense of belonging in engineering (4.2 to 5.0). When asked to describe aspects of the class that contributed to inclusivity towards differences, students cited a collaborative environment, course content on implicit bias and inclusivity, and an approachable teaching team. Overall, our approach was effective in fostering a sense of community and inclusion. We anticipate many of these initiatives can transcend instructional format to positively impact future lab course offerings, irrespective of modality.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43683-022-00081-4.</p>","PeriodicalId":72385,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical engineering education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fostering Community and Inclusion in a Team-Based Hybrid Bioengineering Lab Course.\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa C Taylor, Jamie L Hernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43683-022-00081-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As cornerstones of biomedical engineering and bioengineering undergraduate programs, hands-on laboratory experiences promote key skill development and student engagement. Lab courses often involve team-based activities and close communication with instructors, allowing students to build connection and community. Necessitated by the pandemic, changes to class delivery format presented unprecedented challenges to student inclusion and engagement, especially for students from underrepresented minority backgrounds. Here, we present a multi-faceted approach for fostering inclusion and community-building in a hybrid bioengineering laboratory course. A basis for this project was an approach for team-based project work which allowed students to have hands-on experience in the lab and collaborate extensively with peers, while abiding by social distancing guidelines. Members of each student team worked together remotely and synchronously on a project. One team member executed the hands-on portion of each lab activity and the remote student(s) engaged in the project via online communication. The hybrid lab course was supplemented with interventions to further promote inclusivity and community, including instructor modeling on inclusion, team-based course content, attention to lab session logistics, and instructor communication. Students responded positively, as indicated by the median ratings in course evaluations for the four lab sections in the following categories concerning course climate (using a 5.0 scale): their overall comfort with the climate of the course (4.8 to 5.0), feeling valued and respected by lab instructor (4.8 to 5.0) and their peers (4.8 to 5.0), peers helping each other succeed in the course (4.5 to 5.0), and the degree to which the experience in the course contributed to their sense of belonging in engineering (4.2 to 5.0). When asked to describe aspects of the class that contributed to inclusivity towards differences, students cited a collaborative environment, course content on implicit bias and inclusivity, and an approachable teaching team. Overall, our approach was effective in fostering a sense of community and inclusion. We anticipate many of these initiatives can transcend instructional format to positively impact future lab course offerings, irrespective of modality.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43683-022-00081-4.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical engineering education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274962/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical engineering education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-022-00081-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical engineering education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-022-00081-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为生物医学工程和生物工程本科课程的基石,动手实验室体验促进了关键技能的发展和学生的参与。实验课程通常涉及团队活动和与教师的密切交流,使学生能够建立联系和社区。由于大流行病的影响,授课形式的改变给学生的融入和参与带来了前所未有的挑战,尤其是对来自少数族裔背景的学生而言。在这里,我们介绍了一种在混合生物工程实验课程中促进包容性和社区建设的多方面方法。这个项目的基础是一种基于团队的项目工作方法,它允许学生在实验室中亲身体验,并与同伴广泛合作,同时遵守社会距离准则。每个学生团队的成员在一个项目上远程同步合作。一名小组成员负责每个实验活动的实践部分,远程学生则通过在线交流参与项目。混合实验课程还辅以干预措施,以进一步促进包容性和社区性,包括教师在包容性方面的示范、基于团队的课程内容、对实验课后勤的关注以及教师的沟通。从四个实验班的课程评价中位数可以看出,学生们对课程氛围做出了积极回应(采用 5.0 分制):他们对课程氛围的总体满意度(4.8 至 5.0)、感觉受到实验指导教师(4.8-5.0)和同学(4.8-5.0)的重视和尊重(4.8-5.0)、同学们在课程中互相帮助取得成功(4.5-5.0),以及课程经历在多大程度上增强了他们对工程学的归属感(4.2-5.0)。当被要求描述课程中有助于包容差异的方面时,学生们提到了协作的环境、关于隐性偏见和包容性的课程内容以及平易近人的教学团队。总体而言,我们的方法在培养社区和包容意识方面是有效的。我们预计,这些举措中有许多可以超越教学形式,对未来的实验课程设置产生积极影响,而不论其模式如何:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s43683-022-00081-4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fostering Community and Inclusion in a Team-Based Hybrid Bioengineering Lab Course.

As cornerstones of biomedical engineering and bioengineering undergraduate programs, hands-on laboratory experiences promote key skill development and student engagement. Lab courses often involve team-based activities and close communication with instructors, allowing students to build connection and community. Necessitated by the pandemic, changes to class delivery format presented unprecedented challenges to student inclusion and engagement, especially for students from underrepresented minority backgrounds. Here, we present a multi-faceted approach for fostering inclusion and community-building in a hybrid bioengineering laboratory course. A basis for this project was an approach for team-based project work which allowed students to have hands-on experience in the lab and collaborate extensively with peers, while abiding by social distancing guidelines. Members of each student team worked together remotely and synchronously on a project. One team member executed the hands-on portion of each lab activity and the remote student(s) engaged in the project via online communication. The hybrid lab course was supplemented with interventions to further promote inclusivity and community, including instructor modeling on inclusion, team-based course content, attention to lab session logistics, and instructor communication. Students responded positively, as indicated by the median ratings in course evaluations for the four lab sections in the following categories concerning course climate (using a 5.0 scale): their overall comfort with the climate of the course (4.8 to 5.0), feeling valued and respected by lab instructor (4.8 to 5.0) and their peers (4.8 to 5.0), peers helping each other succeed in the course (4.5 to 5.0), and the degree to which the experience in the course contributed to their sense of belonging in engineering (4.2 to 5.0). When asked to describe aspects of the class that contributed to inclusivity towards differences, students cited a collaborative environment, course content on implicit bias and inclusivity, and an approachable teaching team. Overall, our approach was effective in fostering a sense of community and inclusion. We anticipate many of these initiatives can transcend instructional format to positively impact future lab course offerings, irrespective of modality.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43683-022-00081-4.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Practical Research Methods Course That Teaches How to Be a Successful Biomedical Engineering Graduate Student Lessons from Developing a Rubric for Evaluating Need Statements on Health Technology Innovation Projects Undergraduate Students’ Engineering Systems Thinking in Synthetic Biology Design: A Qualitative Descriptive Study Coming Full Circle: The 360° Experience for Biomedical Engineering Technology Students Incorporating a Hands-On Device-Based Activity in a Human Factors Biomedical Engineering Course in Sub-Saharan Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1