干扰素γ释放法检测潜伏结核感染的立场声明。

IF 1.6 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Communicable Diseases Intelligence Pub Date : 2017-12-01
Ivan Bastian, Chris Coulter
{"title":"干扰素γ释放法检测潜伏结核感染的立场声明。","authors":"Ivan Bastian,&nbsp;Chris Coulter","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interferon-y release assays (IGRAs), such as the Quantiferon (QIFN) TB-Gold Plus assay (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the T-SPOT.TB test (Oxford Immunotec Limited, Abingdon, United Kingdom), are marketed as a substitute for the tuberculin skin test (TST) for the detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). The relative merits of IGRAs and TST have been hotly debated over the last decade. The specificity of IGRAs has been optimised by using Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens. However, IGRAs are functional in vitro T-cell-based assays that may lack reproducibility due to specimen collection, transport, processing and kit manufacturing issues. Longitudinal studies comparing the ability of IGRAs and TST to predict the future development of active tuberculosis disease (TB) are the ultimate arbiters on the respective utility of these assays. Three meta-analyses addressing this comparison have now been published and clinical experience with IGRAs is accumulating. The systematic reviews show that IGRAs and TST have similar (but poor) ability to identify patients with LTBI at risk of developing active TB disease. The improved specificity of IGRAs however may reduce the number of patients requiring preventative therapy. Based on these meta-analyses, The National Tuberculosis Advisory Committee (NTAC) now recommends either TST or an IGRA for the investigation of LTBI in most circumstances. Both tests may be used in patients where the risk of progression to active TB disease is high and the disease sequelae potentially severe (eg. LTBI testing in immunocompromised patients or those commencing anti-tumour necrosis factor-ą (TNF) therapy). Neither test should be used in the investigation of active TB disease (though TST and/or IGRA may be used as supplementary tests in paediatric cases). The choice of test for serial testing in healthcare workers (HCWs) remains controversial. A preference remains for TST in this circumstance because IGRAs have been bedevilled by higher rates of reversions and conversions when used for serial testing. These recommendations supersede all previous NTAC IGRA statements.</p>","PeriodicalId":51669,"journal":{"name":"Communicable Diseases Intelligence","volume":"41 4","pages":"E322-E336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Position statement on interferon-γ release assays for the detection of latent tuberculosis infection.\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Bastian,&nbsp;Chris Coulter\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Interferon-y release assays (IGRAs), such as the Quantiferon (QIFN) TB-Gold Plus assay (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the T-SPOT.TB test (Oxford Immunotec Limited, Abingdon, United Kingdom), are marketed as a substitute for the tuberculin skin test (TST) for the detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). The relative merits of IGRAs and TST have been hotly debated over the last decade. The specificity of IGRAs has been optimised by using Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens. However, IGRAs are functional in vitro T-cell-based assays that may lack reproducibility due to specimen collection, transport, processing and kit manufacturing issues. Longitudinal studies comparing the ability of IGRAs and TST to predict the future development of active tuberculosis disease (TB) are the ultimate arbiters on the respective utility of these assays. Three meta-analyses addressing this comparison have now been published and clinical experience with IGRAs is accumulating. The systematic reviews show that IGRAs and TST have similar (but poor) ability to identify patients with LTBI at risk of developing active TB disease. The improved specificity of IGRAs however may reduce the number of patients requiring preventative therapy. Based on these meta-analyses, The National Tuberculosis Advisory Committee (NTAC) now recommends either TST or an IGRA for the investigation of LTBI in most circumstances. Both tests may be used in patients where the risk of progression to active TB disease is high and the disease sequelae potentially severe (eg. LTBI testing in immunocompromised patients or those commencing anti-tumour necrosis factor-ą (TNF) therapy). Neither test should be used in the investigation of active TB disease (though TST and/or IGRA may be used as supplementary tests in paediatric cases). The choice of test for serial testing in healthcare workers (HCWs) remains controversial. A preference remains for TST in this circumstance because IGRAs have been bedevilled by higher rates of reversions and conversions when used for serial testing. These recommendations supersede all previous NTAC IGRA statements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communicable Diseases Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"E322-E336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communicable Diseases Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicable Diseases Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

干扰素释放试验(IGRAs),如Quantiferon (QIFN) TB-Gold Plus试验(Qiagen, Hilden, Germany)和T-SPOT。结核病试验(牛津免疫有限公司,阿宾顿,英国),作为结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)的替代品,用于检测潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)。在过去的十年里,IGRAs和TST的相对优点一直在激烈争论。利用结核分枝杆菌特异性抗原对IGRAs的特异性进行了优化。然而,IGRAs在体外基于t细胞的测定中是功能性的,由于标本收集、运输、处理和试剂盒制造问题,可能缺乏可重复性。纵向研究比较IGRAs和TST预测活动性结核病(TB)未来发展的能力,是这些检测各自效用的最终裁决者。针对这一比较的三项荟萃分析现已发表,IGRAs的临床经验正在积累。系统评价表明,IGRAs和TST在识别有发展为活动性结核病风险的LTBI患者方面具有相似(但较差)的能力。然而,IGRAs特异性的提高可能会减少需要预防性治疗的患者数量。基于这些荟萃分析,国家结核病咨询委员会(NTAC)现在建议在大多数情况下进行TST或IGRA来调查LTBI。这两种检测方法均可用于进展为活动性结核病风险高且疾病后遗症可能严重的患者(例如:免疫功能低下患者或开始抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)治疗的患者的LTBI检测。这两种检测都不应用于活动性结核病的调查(尽管TST和/或IGRA可作为儿科病例的补充检测)。卫生保健工作者(HCWs)系列检测的选择仍然存在争议。在这种情况下,TST仍然是首选,因为IGRAs在用于串行测试时一直受到较高的还原和转换率的困扰。这些建议取代了以前NTAC IGRA的所有声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Position statement on interferon-γ release assays for the detection of latent tuberculosis infection.

Interferon-y release assays (IGRAs), such as the Quantiferon (QIFN) TB-Gold Plus assay (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the T-SPOT.TB test (Oxford Immunotec Limited, Abingdon, United Kingdom), are marketed as a substitute for the tuberculin skin test (TST) for the detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). The relative merits of IGRAs and TST have been hotly debated over the last decade. The specificity of IGRAs has been optimised by using Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens. However, IGRAs are functional in vitro T-cell-based assays that may lack reproducibility due to specimen collection, transport, processing and kit manufacturing issues. Longitudinal studies comparing the ability of IGRAs and TST to predict the future development of active tuberculosis disease (TB) are the ultimate arbiters on the respective utility of these assays. Three meta-analyses addressing this comparison have now been published and clinical experience with IGRAs is accumulating. The systematic reviews show that IGRAs and TST have similar (but poor) ability to identify patients with LTBI at risk of developing active TB disease. The improved specificity of IGRAs however may reduce the number of patients requiring preventative therapy. Based on these meta-analyses, The National Tuberculosis Advisory Committee (NTAC) now recommends either TST or an IGRA for the investigation of LTBI in most circumstances. Both tests may be used in patients where the risk of progression to active TB disease is high and the disease sequelae potentially severe (eg. LTBI testing in immunocompromised patients or those commencing anti-tumour necrosis factor-ą (TNF) therapy). Neither test should be used in the investigation of active TB disease (though TST and/or IGRA may be used as supplementary tests in paediatric cases). The choice of test for serial testing in healthcare workers (HCWs) remains controversial. A preference remains for TST in this circumstance because IGRAs have been bedevilled by higher rates of reversions and conversions when used for serial testing. These recommendations supersede all previous NTAC IGRA statements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Communicable Diseases Intelligence
Communicable Diseases Intelligence INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
自引率
16.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Professor Mary-Louise McLaws (17 March 1953 – 12 August 2023) Summary of National Surveillance Data on Vaccine Preventable Diseases in Australia, 2016-2018 Final Report - Erratum to Commun Dis Intell (2018) 2022;46. (https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2022.46.28) COVID-19 Australia: Epidemiology Report 73 Reporting period ending 9 April 2023 Australian Rotavirus Surveillance Program: Annual Report, 2017 Invasive Pneumococcal Disease Surveillance, 1 January to 31 March 2017.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1