{"title":"职业性鼻炎吸入挑战调查中鼻腔灌洗的再现性。","authors":"Roberto Castano, Gilles Thériault, Karim Maghni, Heberto Ghezzo, Jean-Luc Malo, Denyse Gautrin","doi":"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The nasal lavage (NAL) method is increasingly used to assess changes in upper airways inflammation in the investigation of occupational rhinitis (OR). A good reproducibility of the method is fundamental to accurately assess changes in markers of inflammation in nasal secretions before and after inhalation challenges. The main objective of this study was to assess the short-term reproducibility of cells and cellular markers of inflammation in NAL in the setting of specific inhalation challenge (SIC) investigating OR. An ancillary objective was to assess the reproducibility of NAL in the context of two different SIC methodologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five subjects attended the laboratory for 2 separate days of NAL performed within the same week. On the first visit subjects underwent NAL before a SIC sham session and on the second visit before a SIC with the active agent. These prechallenge NAL measurements obtained on both days were used to analyze the reproducibility of the NAL method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reproducibility for cell differential counts was satisfactory for neutrophils (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.68), for eosinophils (ICC = 0.95), for macrophages (ICC = 0.77), and for epithelial cells (ICC = 0.73). The reproducibility of total cell counting was poor (ICC = 0.12). The reproducibility of ECP concentrations was satisfactory (ICC = 0.67). Eosinophil counts were reproducible in the context of two different challenge methodologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NAL method was shown to be sufficiently reproducible to be considered useful for the monitoring of upper airways inflammation during the investigation of OR by SIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72175,"journal":{"name":"American journal of rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3165","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of nasal lavage in the context of the inhalation challenge investigation of occupational rhinitis.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Castano, Gilles Thériault, Karim Maghni, Heberto Ghezzo, Jean-Luc Malo, Denyse Gautrin\",\"doi\":\"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The nasal lavage (NAL) method is increasingly used to assess changes in upper airways inflammation in the investigation of occupational rhinitis (OR). A good reproducibility of the method is fundamental to accurately assess changes in markers of inflammation in nasal secretions before and after inhalation challenges. The main objective of this study was to assess the short-term reproducibility of cells and cellular markers of inflammation in NAL in the setting of specific inhalation challenge (SIC) investigating OR. An ancillary objective was to assess the reproducibility of NAL in the context of two different SIC methodologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five subjects attended the laboratory for 2 separate days of NAL performed within the same week. On the first visit subjects underwent NAL before a SIC sham session and on the second visit before a SIC with the active agent. These prechallenge NAL measurements obtained on both days were used to analyze the reproducibility of the NAL method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reproducibility for cell differential counts was satisfactory for neutrophils (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.68), for eosinophils (ICC = 0.95), for macrophages (ICC = 0.77), and for epithelial cells (ICC = 0.73). The reproducibility of total cell counting was poor (ICC = 0.12). The reproducibility of ECP concentrations was satisfactory (ICC = 0.67). Eosinophil counts were reproducible in the context of two different challenge methodologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NAL method was shown to be sufficiently reproducible to be considered useful for the monitoring of upper airways inflammation during the investigation of OR by SIC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of rhinology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3165\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reproducibility of nasal lavage in the context of the inhalation challenge investigation of occupational rhinitis.
Background: The nasal lavage (NAL) method is increasingly used to assess changes in upper airways inflammation in the investigation of occupational rhinitis (OR). A good reproducibility of the method is fundamental to accurately assess changes in markers of inflammation in nasal secretions before and after inhalation challenges. The main objective of this study was to assess the short-term reproducibility of cells and cellular markers of inflammation in NAL in the setting of specific inhalation challenge (SIC) investigating OR. An ancillary objective was to assess the reproducibility of NAL in the context of two different SIC methodologies.
Methods: Twenty-five subjects attended the laboratory for 2 separate days of NAL performed within the same week. On the first visit subjects underwent NAL before a SIC sham session and on the second visit before a SIC with the active agent. These prechallenge NAL measurements obtained on both days were used to analyze the reproducibility of the NAL method.
Results: The reproducibility for cell differential counts was satisfactory for neutrophils (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.68), for eosinophils (ICC = 0.95), for macrophages (ICC = 0.77), and for epithelial cells (ICC = 0.73). The reproducibility of total cell counting was poor (ICC = 0.12). The reproducibility of ECP concentrations was satisfactory (ICC = 0.67). Eosinophil counts were reproducible in the context of two different challenge methodologies.
Conclusion: The NAL method was shown to be sufficiently reproducible to be considered useful for the monitoring of upper airways inflammation during the investigation of OR by SIC.