职业性鼻炎吸入挑战调查中鼻腔灌洗的再现性。

Roberto Castano, Gilles Thériault, Karim Maghni, Heberto Ghezzo, Jean-Luc Malo, Denyse Gautrin
{"title":"职业性鼻炎吸入挑战调查中鼻腔灌洗的再现性。","authors":"Roberto Castano,&nbsp;Gilles Thériault,&nbsp;Karim Maghni,&nbsp;Heberto Ghezzo,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Malo,&nbsp;Denyse Gautrin","doi":"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The nasal lavage (NAL) method is increasingly used to assess changes in upper airways inflammation in the investigation of occupational rhinitis (OR). A good reproducibility of the method is fundamental to accurately assess changes in markers of inflammation in nasal secretions before and after inhalation challenges. The main objective of this study was to assess the short-term reproducibility of cells and cellular markers of inflammation in NAL in the setting of specific inhalation challenge (SIC) investigating OR. An ancillary objective was to assess the reproducibility of NAL in the context of two different SIC methodologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five subjects attended the laboratory for 2 separate days of NAL performed within the same week. On the first visit subjects underwent NAL before a SIC sham session and on the second visit before a SIC with the active agent. These prechallenge NAL measurements obtained on both days were used to analyze the reproducibility of the NAL method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reproducibility for cell differential counts was satisfactory for neutrophils (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.68), for eosinophils (ICC = 0.95), for macrophages (ICC = 0.77), and for epithelial cells (ICC = 0.73). The reproducibility of total cell counting was poor (ICC = 0.12). The reproducibility of ECP concentrations was satisfactory (ICC = 0.67). Eosinophil counts were reproducible in the context of two different challenge methodologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NAL method was shown to be sufficiently reproducible to be considered useful for the monitoring of upper airways inflammation during the investigation of OR by SIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72175,"journal":{"name":"American journal of rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3165","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of nasal lavage in the context of the inhalation challenge investigation of occupational rhinitis.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Castano,&nbsp;Gilles Thériault,&nbsp;Karim Maghni,&nbsp;Heberto Ghezzo,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Malo,&nbsp;Denyse Gautrin\",\"doi\":\"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The nasal lavage (NAL) method is increasingly used to assess changes in upper airways inflammation in the investigation of occupational rhinitis (OR). A good reproducibility of the method is fundamental to accurately assess changes in markers of inflammation in nasal secretions before and after inhalation challenges. The main objective of this study was to assess the short-term reproducibility of cells and cellular markers of inflammation in NAL in the setting of specific inhalation challenge (SIC) investigating OR. An ancillary objective was to assess the reproducibility of NAL in the context of two different SIC methodologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five subjects attended the laboratory for 2 separate days of NAL performed within the same week. On the first visit subjects underwent NAL before a SIC sham session and on the second visit before a SIC with the active agent. These prechallenge NAL measurements obtained on both days were used to analyze the reproducibility of the NAL method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reproducibility for cell differential counts was satisfactory for neutrophils (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.68), for eosinophils (ICC = 0.95), for macrophages (ICC = 0.77), and for epithelial cells (ICC = 0.73). The reproducibility of total cell counting was poor (ICC = 0.12). The reproducibility of ECP concentrations was satisfactory (ICC = 0.67). Eosinophil counts were reproducible in the context of two different challenge methodologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NAL method was shown to be sufficiently reproducible to be considered useful for the monitoring of upper airways inflammation during the investigation of OR by SIC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of rhinology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3165\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

背景:在职业性鼻炎(OR)的调查中,鼻灌洗(NAL)方法越来越多地用于评估上呼吸道炎症的变化。该方法的良好再现性对于准确评估吸入挑战前后鼻分泌物炎症标志物的变化至关重要。本研究的主要目的是评估在特异性吸入刺激(SIC)研究OR的情况下,NAL中细胞和炎症标志物的短期可重复性。辅助目的是评估NAL在两种不同SIC方法背景下的可重复性。方法:25名受试者在同一周内分别在实验室进行2天的NAL检查。在第一次访问中,受试者在SIC假会话前接受NAL,在第二次访问中,受试者在使用活性剂的SIC之前接受NAL。这两天的攻前NAL测量值用于分析NAL方法的可重复性。结果:中性粒细胞(类内相关系数[ICC] = 0.68)、嗜酸性粒细胞(ICC = 0.95)、巨噬细胞(ICC = 0.77)和上皮细胞(ICC = 0.73)的细胞差异计数的重现性令人满意。总细胞计数重现性较差(ICC = 0.12)。ECP浓度的重现性令人满意(ICC = 0.67)。嗜酸性粒细胞计数在两种不同的挑战方法的背景下是可重复的。结论:NAL方法具有良好的重复性,可用于SIC检查OR时上呼吸道炎症的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reproducibility of nasal lavage in the context of the inhalation challenge investigation of occupational rhinitis.

Background: The nasal lavage (NAL) method is increasingly used to assess changes in upper airways inflammation in the investigation of occupational rhinitis (OR). A good reproducibility of the method is fundamental to accurately assess changes in markers of inflammation in nasal secretions before and after inhalation challenges. The main objective of this study was to assess the short-term reproducibility of cells and cellular markers of inflammation in NAL in the setting of specific inhalation challenge (SIC) investigating OR. An ancillary objective was to assess the reproducibility of NAL in the context of two different SIC methodologies.

Methods: Twenty-five subjects attended the laboratory for 2 separate days of NAL performed within the same week. On the first visit subjects underwent NAL before a SIC sham session and on the second visit before a SIC with the active agent. These prechallenge NAL measurements obtained on both days were used to analyze the reproducibility of the NAL method.

Results: The reproducibility for cell differential counts was satisfactory for neutrophils (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.68), for eosinophils (ICC = 0.95), for macrophages (ICC = 0.77), and for epithelial cells (ICC = 0.73). The reproducibility of total cell counting was poor (ICC = 0.12). The reproducibility of ECP concentrations was satisfactory (ICC = 0.67). Eosinophil counts were reproducible in the context of two different challenge methodologies.

Conclusion: The NAL method was shown to be sufficiently reproducible to be considered useful for the monitoring of upper airways inflammation during the investigation of OR by SIC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on the etiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: an immune barrier hypothesis. Comparison of laryngeal mask with endotracheal tube for anesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery. The effect of nasal surgery on snoring. Results of endoscopic maxillary mega-antrostomy in recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis. The efficacy of topical antibiofilm agents in a sheep model of rhinosinusitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1