部分肾切除术后肾细胞癌局部复发:MRI表观扩散系数作为影像学标记的适用性——一项多中心研究。

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Polish Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2022-06-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr.2022.117593
Yulian Mytsyk, Andriy Borzhiyevskyy, Ihor Dutka, Alexander Shulyak, Paweł Kowal, Dmytro Vorobets, Michał Skrzypczyk, Oleksandr Borzhiyevs'kyy, Andrzej Górecki, Viktoria Matskevych
{"title":"部分肾切除术后肾细胞癌局部复发:MRI表观扩散系数作为影像学标记的适用性——一项多中心研究。","authors":"Yulian Mytsyk,&nbsp;Andriy Borzhiyevskyy,&nbsp;Ihor Dutka,&nbsp;Alexander Shulyak,&nbsp;Paweł Kowal,&nbsp;Dmytro Vorobets,&nbsp;Michał Skrzypczyk,&nbsp;Oleksandr Borzhiyevs'kyy,&nbsp;Andrzej Górecki,&nbsp;Viktoria Matskevych","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2022.117593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The goal of the study was an assessment of the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in distinguishing local recurrence (LR) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from benign conditions after partial nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty-nine patients after partial nephrectomy for solid RCC were enrolled in the study. Patients were followed up using MRI, which included DWI sequence (<i>b</i> = 800 s/mm<sup>2</sup>). All patients with MRI features of LR were included in the main group (<i>n</i> = 14) and patients without such features - into the group of comparison (<i>n</i> = 25). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of suspicious lesions were recorded. In all patients with signs of locally recurrent RCC, surgical treatment was performed followed by pathologic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ADC values of recurrent RCC demonstrated significantly higher numbers compared to benign fibrous tissues and were 1.64 ± 0.15 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s vs. 1.02 ± 0.26 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean ADC values of RCCs' LR and benign post-op changes in renal scar substantially differed from mean ADC values of healthy kidneys' parenchyma; the latter was 2.58 ± 0.05 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In ROC analysis, the use of ADC with a threshold value of 1.28 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s allowed us to differentiate local recurrence of RCC from benign postoperative changes with 100% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and accuracy: AUC = 0.980 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The apparent diffusion coefficient of DWI of MRI can be used as a potential imaging marker for the diagnosis of local recurrence of RCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e0/dc/PJR-87-47353.PMC9288198.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local recurrence of renal cell carcinoma after partial nephrectomy: applicability of the apparent diffusion coefficient of MRI as an imaging marker - a multicentre study.\",\"authors\":\"Yulian Mytsyk,&nbsp;Andriy Borzhiyevskyy,&nbsp;Ihor Dutka,&nbsp;Alexander Shulyak,&nbsp;Paweł Kowal,&nbsp;Dmytro Vorobets,&nbsp;Michał Skrzypczyk,&nbsp;Oleksandr Borzhiyevs'kyy,&nbsp;Andrzej Górecki,&nbsp;Viktoria Matskevych\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr.2022.117593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The goal of the study was an assessment of the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in distinguishing local recurrence (LR) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from benign conditions after partial nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty-nine patients after partial nephrectomy for solid RCC were enrolled in the study. Patients were followed up using MRI, which included DWI sequence (<i>b</i> = 800 s/mm<sup>2</sup>). All patients with MRI features of LR were included in the main group (<i>n</i> = 14) and patients without such features - into the group of comparison (<i>n</i> = 25). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of suspicious lesions were recorded. In all patients with signs of locally recurrent RCC, surgical treatment was performed followed by pathologic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ADC values of recurrent RCC demonstrated significantly higher numbers compared to benign fibrous tissues and were 1.64 ± 0.15 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s vs. 1.02 ± 0.26 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean ADC values of RCCs' LR and benign post-op changes in renal scar substantially differed from mean ADC values of healthy kidneys' parenchyma; the latter was 2.58 ± 0.05 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In ROC analysis, the use of ADC with a threshold value of 1.28 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s allowed us to differentiate local recurrence of RCC from benign postoperative changes with 100% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and accuracy: AUC = 0.980 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The apparent diffusion coefficient of DWI of MRI can be used as a potential imaging marker for the diagnosis of local recurrence of RCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e0/dc/PJR-87-47353.PMC9288198.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.117593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.117593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估磁共振成像(MRI)的弥散加权图像(DWI)和表观弥散系数(ADC)在区分肾细胞癌(RCC)局部复发(LR)和良性病变的诊断性能。材料和方法:39例实性肾细胞癌部分切除后的患者入组研究。对患者进行MRI随访,包括DWI序列(b = 800 s/mm2)。所有具有LR MRI特征的患者被纳入主要组(n = 14),没有这些特征的患者被纳入对照组(n = 25)。记录可疑病变的表观扩散系数(ADC)值。所有有局部复发RCC症状的患者均行手术治疗并进行病理分析。结果:复发性RCC的平均ADC值明显高于良性纤维组织,分别为1.64±0.15 × 10-3 mm2/s和1.02±0.26 × 10-3 mm2/s (p < 0.001)。肾瘢痕术后良性改变的ADC平均值与健康肾实质的ADC平均值有显著差异;后者为2.58±0.05 × 10-3 mm2/s (p < 0.001)。在ROC分析中,使用阈值为1.28 × 10-3 mm2/s的ADC使我们能够区分RCC局部复发与术后良性变化,其灵敏度为100%,特异性为80%,准确度为AUC = 0.980 (p < 0.001)。结论:MRI DWI表观扩散系数可作为诊断RCC局部复发的潜在影像学指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Local recurrence of renal cell carcinoma after partial nephrectomy: applicability of the apparent diffusion coefficient of MRI as an imaging marker - a multicentre study.

Purpose: The goal of the study was an assessment of the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in distinguishing local recurrence (LR) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from benign conditions after partial nephrectomy.

Material and methods: Thirty-nine patients after partial nephrectomy for solid RCC were enrolled in the study. Patients were followed up using MRI, which included DWI sequence (b = 800 s/mm2). All patients with MRI features of LR were included in the main group (n = 14) and patients without such features - into the group of comparison (n = 25). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of suspicious lesions were recorded. In all patients with signs of locally recurrent RCC, surgical treatment was performed followed by pathologic analysis.

Results: The mean ADC values of recurrent RCC demonstrated significantly higher numbers compared to benign fibrous tissues and were 1.64 ± 0.15 × 10-3 mm2/s vs. 1.02 ± 0.26 × 10-3 mm2/s (p < 0.001). The mean ADC values of RCCs' LR and benign post-op changes in renal scar substantially differed from mean ADC values of healthy kidneys' parenchyma; the latter was 2.58 ± 0.05 × 10-3 mm2/s (p < 0.001). In ROC analysis, the use of ADC with a threshold value of 1.28 × 10-3 mm2/s allowed us to differentiate local recurrence of RCC from benign postoperative changes with 100% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and accuracy: AUC = 0.980 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The apparent diffusion coefficient of DWI of MRI can be used as a potential imaging marker for the diagnosis of local recurrence of RCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Radiology
Polish Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lung ultrasound in a nutshell. Lines, signs, some applications, and misconceptions from a radiologist's point of view. Ablation of pulmonary neoplasms: review of literature and future perspectives. Bone marrow lesions of the femoral head: can radiomics distinguish whether it is reversible? Summary of radiation dose management and optimization: comparison of radiation protection measures between Poland and other countries. Diagnosis and treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis - a comprehensive overview.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1