认知行为治疗能力量表(CCS)的初步开发与验证。

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Cognitive Behaviour Therapist Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-15 DOI:10.1017/s1754470x21000362
Natalie Rodriguez-Quintana, Seo Youn Choi, Emily Bilek, Elizabeth Koschmann, Jeffrey Albrecht, Michael Prisbe, Shawna Smith
{"title":"认知行为治疗能力量表(CCS)的初步开发与验证。","authors":"Natalie Rodriguez-Quintana,&nbsp;Seo Youn Choi,&nbsp;Emily Bilek,&nbsp;Elizabeth Koschmann,&nbsp;Jeffrey Albrecht,&nbsp;Michael Prisbe,&nbsp;Shawna Smith","doi":"10.1017/s1754470x21000362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nearly one-third of youth are affected by a mental health disorder, and the majority do not receive adequate care. To improve clinical outcomes among youth, efforts have been made to train providers in evidence-based mental health practices, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Such efforts call for valid assessment measures that can inform and evaluate training activities.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study presents the development and validation of the CBT Competence Scale (CCS), a brief self-report measure to assess provider competence for CBT delivery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 387 school mental health professionals (SMHPs) working with students in Michigan, USA. Initial items (<i>n</i>=59) were developed to evaluate competence in delivering common elements of CBT, with competence conceptualized as covering domains of knowledge, perception, and use of CBT techniques. CCS validation proceeded in three steps: using item response theory to select the most important items for assessing knowledge, evaluating the factor structure using exploratory and then confirmatory factor analyses, and examining reliability and validity of the resultant measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The validated CCS measure consists of four dimensions of CBT competence across 33 items: Non-behavioral skills, Behavioral skills, Perceptions, and Knowledge. The CCS demonstrated excellent internal consistency and good construct-based validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CCS holds promise as a valid, informative measure of CBT competence appropriate for the school setting, with potential for application in other environments such as mental health clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":45163,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307077/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Competence Scale (CCS): initial development and validation.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Rodriguez-Quintana,&nbsp;Seo Youn Choi,&nbsp;Emily Bilek,&nbsp;Elizabeth Koschmann,&nbsp;Jeffrey Albrecht,&nbsp;Michael Prisbe,&nbsp;Shawna Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1754470x21000362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nearly one-third of youth are affected by a mental health disorder, and the majority do not receive adequate care. To improve clinical outcomes among youth, efforts have been made to train providers in evidence-based mental health practices, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Such efforts call for valid assessment measures that can inform and evaluate training activities.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study presents the development and validation of the CBT Competence Scale (CCS), a brief self-report measure to assess provider competence for CBT delivery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 387 school mental health professionals (SMHPs) working with students in Michigan, USA. Initial items (<i>n</i>=59) were developed to evaluate competence in delivering common elements of CBT, with competence conceptualized as covering domains of knowledge, perception, and use of CBT techniques. CCS validation proceeded in three steps: using item response theory to select the most important items for assessing knowledge, evaluating the factor structure using exploratory and then confirmatory factor analyses, and examining reliability and validity of the resultant measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The validated CCS measure consists of four dimensions of CBT competence across 33 items: Non-behavioral skills, Behavioral skills, Perceptions, and Knowledge. The CCS demonstrated excellent internal consistency and good construct-based validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CCS holds promise as a valid, informative measure of CBT competence appropriate for the school setting, with potential for application in other environments such as mental health clinics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307077/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1754470x21000362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1754470x21000362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:近三分之一的青年受到精神健康障碍的影响,大多数人没有得到适当的护理。为了改善青年的临床结果,已经努力培训提供者以证据为基础的心理健康实践,如认知行为疗法(CBT)。这种努力需要有效的评估措施,以便为培训活动提供信息和评价。目的:本研究提出了CBT能力量表(CCS)的开发和验证,CCS是一种简短的自我报告测量来评估提供者提供CBT的能力。方法:以美国密歇根州387名学校心理健康专业人员(SMHPs)为研究对象。初始项目(n=59)用于评估提供CBT共同要素的能力,能力的概念包括知识、感知和CBT技术的使用领域。CCS验证分三个步骤进行:使用项目反应理论选择最重要的评估知识的项目,使用探索性和验证性因素分析评估因素结构,以及检验结果测量的信度和效度。结果:经验证的认知行为能力量表包括四个维度,共33个项目:非行为技能、行为技能、感知和知识。CCS具有良好的内部一致性和良好的构念效度。结论:CCS有望作为一种有效的、信息丰富的CBT能力测量方法,适用于学校环境,并有可能应用于其他环境,如心理健康诊所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Competence Scale (CCS): initial development and validation.

Background: Nearly one-third of youth are affected by a mental health disorder, and the majority do not receive adequate care. To improve clinical outcomes among youth, efforts have been made to train providers in evidence-based mental health practices, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Such efforts call for valid assessment measures that can inform and evaluate training activities.

Aims: This study presents the development and validation of the CBT Competence Scale (CCS), a brief self-report measure to assess provider competence for CBT delivery.

Method: Participants were 387 school mental health professionals (SMHPs) working with students in Michigan, USA. Initial items (n=59) were developed to evaluate competence in delivering common elements of CBT, with competence conceptualized as covering domains of knowledge, perception, and use of CBT techniques. CCS validation proceeded in three steps: using item response theory to select the most important items for assessing knowledge, evaluating the factor structure using exploratory and then confirmatory factor analyses, and examining reliability and validity of the resultant measure.

Results: The validated CCS measure consists of four dimensions of CBT competence across 33 items: Non-behavioral skills, Behavioral skills, Perceptions, and Knowledge. The CCS demonstrated excellent internal consistency and good construct-based validity.

Conclusions: The CCS holds promise as a valid, informative measure of CBT competence appropriate for the school setting, with potential for application in other environments such as mental health clinics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapist
Cognitive Behaviour Therapist PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Gender- and Sexuality-Minoritised Adolescents in DBT: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Minority-Specific Treatment Targets and Experience. Moving forward with the loss of a loved one: treating PTSD following traumatic bereavement with cognitive therapy. Implementing dialectical behaviour therapy in routine practice: an evaluation of a national CAMHS DBT service for adolescents Clinician experiences on training and awareness of sexual orientation in NHS Talking Therapies Services for Anxiety and Depression Therapists’ beliefs about excessive reassurance seeking and helping manage it: does experience play a role?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1