{"title":"减少头颈部癌症再入院(HANCARRE)项目:减少 30 天再入院率。","authors":"Sara Yang, William Adams, Carol Bier-Laning","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Unplanned 30-day readmissions result in increased costs and decreased patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to compare readmission rates before and after a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative that focuses on patient and staff education, use of targeted skilled nursing facilities, and appropriate use of patient observation status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a quality improvement study of all unplanned admissions to the Head and Neck Oncology service at a tertiary care facility during a 3-year period between October 2015 and September 2018. In October 2016, when the Head and Neck Oncology service revised its discharge practices for patients undergoing extirpative and/or reconstructive surgery. These changes included enhancing patient education, increasing the use of a skilled nursing facility with directed staff education and patient handoffs by advanced practice nurses, and appropriate utilization of 23-h observation status for returning patients. The readmission rate from the pre-intervention era (October 2015 through September 2016) was compared to the readmission rate from the post-intervention era (October 2016 through September 2018). Secondary outcomes were the rates of 23-h observation within 30 days of the discharge as well as emergency room visits within 30 days of discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this sample of 449 patients, 161 (35.9%) were observed before the change-in-practice (before October 2016), and 288 (64.1%) were observed following the change-in-practice (after September 2016). On univariable analysis, the risk of readmission declined by approximately 41.4% from the pre-intervention era, though this conclusion was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.06). On multivariable analysis, patients at moderate or high risk of death were 2.31 times more likely than those at minor risk of death to readmit within 30 days (<i>P</i> = 0.03). Similarly, those with recurrent or persistent cancer were 3.33 times more likely than those undergoing initial curative surgical management of cancer to readmit within 30 days (<i>P</i> = 0.001). No patient characteristics were associated with a 23-h observation following discharge (all <i>P</i> > 0.05). Conclusions were similar for emergency room visits following discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A three-part quality improvement strategy resulted in a clinically important decrease in 30-day readmissions, though the decline was not statistically significant. There were no significant changes in 23-h observation within 30 days of discharge or emergency room visits within 30 days of discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"8 2","pages":"158-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b3/66/WJO2-8-158.PMC9242425.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Head and neck cancer readmission reduction (HANCARRE) project: Reducing 30-day readmissions.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Yang, William Adams, Carol Bier-Laning\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjo2.56\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Unplanned 30-day readmissions result in increased costs and decreased patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to compare readmission rates before and after a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative that focuses on patient and staff education, use of targeted skilled nursing facilities, and appropriate use of patient observation status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a quality improvement study of all unplanned admissions to the Head and Neck Oncology service at a tertiary care facility during a 3-year period between October 2015 and September 2018. In October 2016, when the Head and Neck Oncology service revised its discharge practices for patients undergoing extirpative and/or reconstructive surgery. These changes included enhancing patient education, increasing the use of a skilled nursing facility with directed staff education and patient handoffs by advanced practice nurses, and appropriate utilization of 23-h observation status for returning patients. The readmission rate from the pre-intervention era (October 2015 through September 2016) was compared to the readmission rate from the post-intervention era (October 2016 through September 2018). Secondary outcomes were the rates of 23-h observation within 30 days of the discharge as well as emergency room visits within 30 days of discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this sample of 449 patients, 161 (35.9%) were observed before the change-in-practice (before October 2016), and 288 (64.1%) were observed following the change-in-practice (after September 2016). On univariable analysis, the risk of readmission declined by approximately 41.4% from the pre-intervention era, though this conclusion was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.06). On multivariable analysis, patients at moderate or high risk of death were 2.31 times more likely than those at minor risk of death to readmit within 30 days (<i>P</i> = 0.03). Similarly, those with recurrent or persistent cancer were 3.33 times more likely than those undergoing initial curative surgical management of cancer to readmit within 30 days (<i>P</i> = 0.001). No patient characteristics were associated with a 23-h observation following discharge (all <i>P</i> > 0.05). Conclusions were similar for emergency room visits following discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A three-part quality improvement strategy resulted in a clinically important decrease in 30-day readmissions, though the decline was not statistically significant. There were no significant changes in 23-h observation within 30 days of discharge or emergency room visits within 30 days of discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"158-166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b3/66/WJO2-8-158.PMC9242425.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.56\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Head and neck cancer readmission reduction (HANCARRE) project: Reducing 30-day readmissions.
Objective: Unplanned 30-day readmissions result in increased costs and decreased patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to compare readmission rates before and after a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative that focuses on patient and staff education, use of targeted skilled nursing facilities, and appropriate use of patient observation status.
Methods: This was a quality improvement study of all unplanned admissions to the Head and Neck Oncology service at a tertiary care facility during a 3-year period between October 2015 and September 2018. In October 2016, when the Head and Neck Oncology service revised its discharge practices for patients undergoing extirpative and/or reconstructive surgery. These changes included enhancing patient education, increasing the use of a skilled nursing facility with directed staff education and patient handoffs by advanced practice nurses, and appropriate utilization of 23-h observation status for returning patients. The readmission rate from the pre-intervention era (October 2015 through September 2016) was compared to the readmission rate from the post-intervention era (October 2016 through September 2018). Secondary outcomes were the rates of 23-h observation within 30 days of the discharge as well as emergency room visits within 30 days of discharge.
Results: In this sample of 449 patients, 161 (35.9%) were observed before the change-in-practice (before October 2016), and 288 (64.1%) were observed following the change-in-practice (after September 2016). On univariable analysis, the risk of readmission declined by approximately 41.4% from the pre-intervention era, though this conclusion was not statistically significant (P = 0.06). On multivariable analysis, patients at moderate or high risk of death were 2.31 times more likely than those at minor risk of death to readmit within 30 days (P = 0.03). Similarly, those with recurrent or persistent cancer were 3.33 times more likely than those undergoing initial curative surgical management of cancer to readmit within 30 days (P = 0.001). No patient characteristics were associated with a 23-h observation following discharge (all P > 0.05). Conclusions were similar for emergency room visits following discharge.
Conclusions: A three-part quality improvement strategy resulted in a clinically important decrease in 30-day readmissions, though the decline was not statistically significant. There were no significant changes in 23-h observation within 30 days of discharge or emergency room visits within 30 days of discharge.