巴塞罗那咀嚼发音障碍量表:定量评估工具。

N. Montagut , S. Borrego-Écija , J. Herrero , A. Lladó , M. Balasa , E. Muñoz , F. Valldeoriola , R. Sánchez-Valle
{"title":"巴塞罗那咀嚼发音障碍量表:定量评估工具。","authors":"N. Montagut ,&nbsp;S. Borrego-Écija ,&nbsp;J. Herrero ,&nbsp;A. Lladó ,&nbsp;M. Balasa ,&nbsp;E. Muñoz ,&nbsp;F. Valldeoriola ,&nbsp;R. Sánchez-Valle","doi":"10.1016/j.nrleng.2022.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Currently there is no tool to quantify buccophonatory apraxia to stratify, compare and monitor patients longitudinally in an objective manner. Our aim in this study is to create a quantitative scale for buccophonatory apraxia and evaluate it in patients with the non-fluent/grammatical variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) and other neurodegenerative diseases that occur with speech and/or language problems.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The scale was designed based on useful elements in the assessment of buccophonatory apraxia and the total was quantified in seconds. The scale was administered to 64 participants with diagnoses of: nfvPPA, semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, as well as a group of healthy controls.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients showed a significantly higher score compared to controls. The nfvPPA group had the highest mean score on the scale (429 seconds ± 278). The scale was useful to differentiate vnfPPA from svPPA and Parkinson’s disease (area under curve [AUC] of 0.956 and 0.989, respectively), but less to differentiate it from Huntington’s disease (AUC = 0.67) and lvPPA. There was a statistically significant relationship between total score and disease severity in nfvPPA (<em>P</em> &lt; .029).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Barcelona scale for buccophonatory apraxia could be useful to quantitatively evaluate buccophonatory apraxia in different neurodegenerative diseases, and compare patients, especially in nfvPPA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94155,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"40 1","pages":"Pages 48-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barcelona scale for buccophonatory apraxia: Quantitative assessment tool\",\"authors\":\"N. Montagut ,&nbsp;S. Borrego-Écija ,&nbsp;J. Herrero ,&nbsp;A. Lladó ,&nbsp;M. Balasa ,&nbsp;E. Muñoz ,&nbsp;F. Valldeoriola ,&nbsp;R. Sánchez-Valle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nrleng.2022.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Currently there is no tool to quantify buccophonatory apraxia to stratify, compare and monitor patients longitudinally in an objective manner. Our aim in this study is to create a quantitative scale for buccophonatory apraxia and evaluate it in patients with the non-fluent/grammatical variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) and other neurodegenerative diseases that occur with speech and/or language problems.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The scale was designed based on useful elements in the assessment of buccophonatory apraxia and the total was quantified in seconds. The scale was administered to 64 participants with diagnoses of: nfvPPA, semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, as well as a group of healthy controls.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients showed a significantly higher score compared to controls. The nfvPPA group had the highest mean score on the scale (429 seconds ± 278). The scale was useful to differentiate vnfPPA from svPPA and Parkinson’s disease (area under curve [AUC] of 0.956 and 0.989, respectively), but less to differentiate it from Huntington’s disease (AUC = 0.67) and lvPPA. There was a statistically significant relationship between total score and disease severity in nfvPPA (<em>P</em> &lt; .029).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Barcelona scale for buccophonatory apraxia could be useful to quantitatively evaluate buccophonatory apraxia in different neurodegenerative diseases, and compare patients, especially in nfvPPA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 48-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580822001407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580822001407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:目前,还没有一种量化口语障碍的工具,可以客观地对患者进行分层、比较和纵向监测。本研究的目的是创建一个发音障碍量化量表,并对原发性进行性失语症非流利/语法变异型(nfvPPA)和其他伴有言语和/或语言问题的神经退行性疾病患者进行评估:该量表是根据评估颊发音障碍的有用要素设计的,总分以秒为单位进行量化。该量表适用于64名被诊断为以下疾病的患者:nfvPPA、原发性进行性失语的语义变异型(svPPA)、原发性进行性失语的对数开放变异型(lvPPA)、亨廷顿氏病、帕金森氏病以及一组健康对照组:结果:与对照组相比,患者的得分明显更高。nfvPPA 组的量表平均得分最高(429 秒 ± 278)。该量表有助于区分vnfPPA与svPPA和帕金森病(曲线下面积[AUC]分别为0.956和0.989),但较难区分vnfPPA与亨廷顿病(AUC = 0.67)和lvPPA。在nfvPPA中,总分与疾病严重程度之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系(P < .029):巴塞罗那发音障碍量表可用于定量评估不同神经退行性疾病的发音障碍,并对患者进行比较,尤其是对nfvPPA患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barcelona scale for buccophonatory apraxia: Quantitative assessment tool

Introduction

Currently there is no tool to quantify buccophonatory apraxia to stratify, compare and monitor patients longitudinally in an objective manner. Our aim in this study is to create a quantitative scale for buccophonatory apraxia and evaluate it in patients with the non-fluent/grammatical variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) and other neurodegenerative diseases that occur with speech and/or language problems.

Methods

The scale was designed based on useful elements in the assessment of buccophonatory apraxia and the total was quantified in seconds. The scale was administered to 64 participants with diagnoses of: nfvPPA, semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, as well as a group of healthy controls.

Results

Patients showed a significantly higher score compared to controls. The nfvPPA group had the highest mean score on the scale (429 seconds ± 278). The scale was useful to differentiate vnfPPA from svPPA and Parkinson’s disease (area under curve [AUC] of 0.956 and 0.989, respectively), but less to differentiate it from Huntington’s disease (AUC = 0.67) and lvPPA. There was a statistically significant relationship between total score and disease severity in nfvPPA (P < .029).

Conclusions

The Barcelona scale for buccophonatory apraxia could be useful to quantitatively evaluate buccophonatory apraxia in different neurodegenerative diseases, and compare patients, especially in nfvPPA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
The current situation of Telestroke in Spain. Focusing on post-COVID syndrome fatigue. A variant in GRN of Spanish origin presenting with heterogeneous phenotypes A phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a valproate/lithium combination in ALS patients The prevalence of cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who received rituximab: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1