Ahmed S Abdelrahman, Sherihan S Madkour, Mena E Y Ekladious
{"title":"肝脏影像学报告和数据系统(LI-RADS) v2018用于肝脏病变评估的互连可靠性和一致性","authors":"Ahmed S Abdelrahman, Sherihan S Madkour, Mena E Y Ekladious","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2022.117590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) is a structured reporting system that categorizes hepatic observations according to major imaging features and lesion size, with an optional ancillary features contribution. This study aimed to evaluate inter-reader agreement of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using LI-RADS v2018 lexicon.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-nine patients with 69 hepatic observations were included in our study. The major and ancillary features of each hepatic observation were evaluated by 2 radiologists using LI-RADS v2018, and the interreader agreement was allocated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter-reader agreement of major LI-RADS features was substantial; κ of non-rim arterial hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout appearance, and enhancing capsule was 0.796, 0.799, and 0.772 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively. The agreement of the final LI-RADS category was substantial with κ = 0.651 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and weighted κ = 0.786 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The inter-reader agreement of the ancillary features was substantial to almost perfect (k range from 0.718 to 1; <i>p</i> < 0.001). An almost perfect correlation was noted for the hepatic lesion size measurement with ICC = 0.977 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The major and ancillary features of the LI-RADS v2018, as well as the final category and lesions size, have substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/81/PJR-87-47352.PMC9288199.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed S Abdelrahman, Sherihan S Madkour, Mena E Y Ekladious\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr.2022.117590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) is a structured reporting system that categorizes hepatic observations according to major imaging features and lesion size, with an optional ancillary features contribution. This study aimed to evaluate inter-reader agreement of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using LI-RADS v2018 lexicon.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-nine patients with 69 hepatic observations were included in our study. The major and ancillary features of each hepatic observation were evaluated by 2 radiologists using LI-RADS v2018, and the interreader agreement was allocated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter-reader agreement of major LI-RADS features was substantial; κ of non-rim arterial hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout appearance, and enhancing capsule was 0.796, 0.799, and 0.772 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively. The agreement of the final LI-RADS category was substantial with κ = 0.651 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and weighted κ = 0.786 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The inter-reader agreement of the ancillary features was substantial to almost perfect (k range from 0.718 to 1; <i>p</i> < 0.001). An almost perfect correlation was noted for the hepatic lesion size measurement with ICC = 0.977 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The major and ancillary features of the LI-RADS v2018, as well as the final category and lesions size, have substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/81/PJR-87-47352.PMC9288199.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.117590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.117590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions.
Purpose: The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) is a structured reporting system that categorizes hepatic observations according to major imaging features and lesion size, with an optional ancillary features contribution. This study aimed to evaluate inter-reader agreement of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using LI-RADS v2018 lexicon.
Material and methods: Forty-nine patients with 69 hepatic observations were included in our study. The major and ancillary features of each hepatic observation were evaluated by 2 radiologists using LI-RADS v2018, and the interreader agreement was allocated.
Results: The inter-reader agreement of major LI-RADS features was substantial; κ of non-rim arterial hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout appearance, and enhancing capsule was 0.796, 0.799, and 0.772 (p < 0.001), respectively. The agreement of the final LI-RADS category was substantial with κ = 0.651 (p < 0.001), and weighted κ = 0.786 (p < 0.001). The inter-reader agreement of the ancillary features was substantial to almost perfect (k range from 0.718 to 1; p < 0.001). An almost perfect correlation was noted for the hepatic lesion size measurement with ICC = 0.977 (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The major and ancillary features of the LI-RADS v2018, as well as the final category and lesions size, have substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement.