药物涂层球囊或药物洗脱支架--为高出血风险患者确定最佳策略。

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart International Pub Date : 2020-12-23 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.100
Natasha H Corballis, Tha H Nyi, Vassilios S Vassiliou, Simon C Eccleshall
{"title":"药物涂层球囊或药物洗脱支架--为高出血风险患者确定最佳策略。","authors":"Natasha H Corballis, Tha H Nyi, Vassilios S Vassiliou, Simon C Eccleshall","doi":"10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>he management of patients who require percutaneous coronary intervention and are at high risk of bleeding continues to be challenging; balancing thrombotic risk versus bleeding risk to determine the safest duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). With recent efforts to determine the safety of 1 month of DAPT after implantation of a drug-eluting stent, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have also been explored, as both have been shown superior to bare-metal stents, which have historically been used for patients with high bleeding risk. We sought to review the literature surrounding the safety profile and bleeding events with both DCBs and drug-eluting stents, and conclude that while both offer safety of cessation of DAPT after 1 month, DCBs offer lower major adverse cardiovascular events.</p>","PeriodicalId":12836,"journal":{"name":"Heart International","volume":"14 2","pages":"100-104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524755/pdf/heart-int-14-100.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug-coated Balloons or Drug-eluting Stents - Determining an Optimum Strategy for Patients with High Bleeding Risk.\",\"authors\":\"Natasha H Corballis, Tha H Nyi, Vassilios S Vassiliou, Simon C Eccleshall\",\"doi\":\"10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>he management of patients who require percutaneous coronary intervention and are at high risk of bleeding continues to be challenging; balancing thrombotic risk versus bleeding risk to determine the safest duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). With recent efforts to determine the safety of 1 month of DAPT after implantation of a drug-eluting stent, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have also been explored, as both have been shown superior to bare-metal stents, which have historically been used for patients with high bleeding risk. We sought to review the literature surrounding the safety profile and bleeding events with both DCBs and drug-eluting stents, and conclude that while both offer safety of cessation of DAPT after 1 month, DCBs offer lower major adverse cardiovascular events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart International\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"100-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524755/pdf/heart-int-14-100.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗且出血风险较高的患者进行管理仍然是一项挑战;如何在血栓风险和出血风险之间取得平衡,以确定最安全的双联抗血小板疗法(DAPT)持续时间?最近,人们在努力确定植入药物洗脱支架后 1 个月 DAPT 的安全性,同时也在探索药物涂层球囊 (DCB),因为两者都被证明优于裸金属支架,而裸金属支架历来用于出血风险高的患者。我们试图回顾有关 DCB 和药物洗脱支架安全性和出血事件的文献,得出的结论是,虽然两者都能在 1 个月后安全停止 DAPT,但 DCB 的主要不良心血管事件更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drug-coated Balloons or Drug-eluting Stents - Determining an Optimum Strategy for Patients with High Bleeding Risk.

he management of patients who require percutaneous coronary intervention and are at high risk of bleeding continues to be challenging; balancing thrombotic risk versus bleeding risk to determine the safest duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). With recent efforts to determine the safety of 1 month of DAPT after implantation of a drug-eluting stent, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have also been explored, as both have been shown superior to bare-metal stents, which have historically been used for patients with high bleeding risk. We sought to review the literature surrounding the safety profile and bleeding events with both DCBs and drug-eluting stents, and conclude that while both offer safety of cessation of DAPT after 1 month, DCBs offer lower major adverse cardiovascular events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart International
Heart International Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Commonly Used 3D Mapping Systems in Acute Success Rates of Catheter Ablation Procedures. Evolution of Disease-modifying Therapy for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis. Femoral Neck Osteoporosis Is Associated with a Higher Odds of Coronary Artery Disease in Indian Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-sectional Study from a Teaching Hospital in Southern India. Cardiovascular Implications of Semaglutide in Obesity Management: Redefining Cardiovascular Health Strategies. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the NAVITOR Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1