托吡酯在癫痫实验模型中的应用——仿制药、类似药和参比药的相似性。

Journal of epilepsy research Pub Date : 2022-06-30 eCollection Date: 2022-06-01 DOI:10.14581/jer.22001
George Linard Silva Malveira, Sacha Aubrey Alves Rodrigues Santos, Gerlânia de Oliveira Leite, Gdayllon Cavalcante Meneses, Adriana Rolim Campos
{"title":"托吡酯在癫痫实验模型中的应用——仿制药、类似药和参比药的相似性。","authors":"George Linard Silva Malveira,&nbsp;Sacha Aubrey Alves Rodrigues Santos,&nbsp;Gerlânia de Oliveira Leite,&nbsp;Gdayllon Cavalcante Meneses,&nbsp;Adriana Rolim Campos","doi":"10.14581/jer.22001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The literature is still controversial in relation to therapeutic differences between innovative, generic, and similar anti-seizures medications (ASM). Topiramate (TPM) is an ASM used in the treatment of various seizure types and in different epileptic syndromes, as well as in other groups of morbidities, and it is available in many generic and similar forms, besides the innovator. The aim of this translational work was to compare different brands of TPM by using animal models of seizures induced by pentylenetetrazole (PTZ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five brands of TPM (one reference, two similar and two generics) were tested in mice. Animals were previously treated with TPM (n=6/brand) and latencies from PTZ injection to onset of manifestations, first seizure and death were measured and compared between groups. Experiment was conducted in two settings: acute seizure model (PTZ 80 mg/kg) and kindling model (PTZ 20, 30, and 40 mg/kg in 8 alternate days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experiment did not demonstrate significant differences between the TPM brands regarding the protective effect in the acute seizure and kindling models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, results can be explained by true therapeutic equivalence or insufficiency of the PTZ model to reveal differences among brands.</p>","PeriodicalId":73741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epilepsy research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c9/a5/jer-22001.PMC9289377.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topiramate in an Experimental Model of Epilepsy - Similarity between Generic, Similar and Reference Drugs.\",\"authors\":\"George Linard Silva Malveira,&nbsp;Sacha Aubrey Alves Rodrigues Santos,&nbsp;Gerlânia de Oliveira Leite,&nbsp;Gdayllon Cavalcante Meneses,&nbsp;Adriana Rolim Campos\",\"doi\":\"10.14581/jer.22001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The literature is still controversial in relation to therapeutic differences between innovative, generic, and similar anti-seizures medications (ASM). Topiramate (TPM) is an ASM used in the treatment of various seizure types and in different epileptic syndromes, as well as in other groups of morbidities, and it is available in many generic and similar forms, besides the innovator. The aim of this translational work was to compare different brands of TPM by using animal models of seizures induced by pentylenetetrazole (PTZ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five brands of TPM (one reference, two similar and two generics) were tested in mice. Animals were previously treated with TPM (n=6/brand) and latencies from PTZ injection to onset of manifestations, first seizure and death were measured and compared between groups. Experiment was conducted in two settings: acute seizure model (PTZ 80 mg/kg) and kindling model (PTZ 20, 30, and 40 mg/kg in 8 alternate days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experiment did not demonstrate significant differences between the TPM brands regarding the protective effect in the acute seizure and kindling models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, results can be explained by true therapeutic equivalence or insufficiency of the PTZ model to reveal differences among brands.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of epilepsy research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c9/a5/jer-22001.PMC9289377.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of epilepsy research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.22001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epilepsy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.22001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:关于创新、通用和类似抗癫痫药物(ASM)之间的治疗差异,文献仍然存在争议。托吡酯(TPM)是一种ASM,用于治疗各种癫痫类型和不同的癫痫综合征,以及其他组的发病率,它有许多通用和类似的形式,除了创新。这项转化工作的目的是通过使用戊四唑(PTZ)诱发癫痫的动物模型来比较不同品牌的TPM。方法:对5个品牌的TPM(1个参比、2个同类、2个仿制)进行小鼠实验。动物先前接受TPM治疗(n=6/brand),测量PTZ注射到出现症状、首次发作和死亡的潜伏期,并比较各组之间的差异。实验分为急性发作模型(PTZ 80 mg/kg)和点火模型(PTZ 20、30、40 mg/kg,隔天8天)。结果:TPM品牌对急性发作模型和点火模型的保护作用无显著性差异。结论:综上所述,结果可以通过PTZ模型的真正治疗等效或不足来解释,以揭示品牌之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Topiramate in an Experimental Model of Epilepsy - Similarity between Generic, Similar and Reference Drugs.

Background and purpose: The literature is still controversial in relation to therapeutic differences between innovative, generic, and similar anti-seizures medications (ASM). Topiramate (TPM) is an ASM used in the treatment of various seizure types and in different epileptic syndromes, as well as in other groups of morbidities, and it is available in many generic and similar forms, besides the innovator. The aim of this translational work was to compare different brands of TPM by using animal models of seizures induced by pentylenetetrazole (PTZ).

Methods: Five brands of TPM (one reference, two similar and two generics) were tested in mice. Animals were previously treated with TPM (n=6/brand) and latencies from PTZ injection to onset of manifestations, first seizure and death were measured and compared between groups. Experiment was conducted in two settings: acute seizure model (PTZ 80 mg/kg) and kindling model (PTZ 20, 30, and 40 mg/kg in 8 alternate days).

Results: The experiment did not demonstrate significant differences between the TPM brands regarding the protective effect in the acute seizure and kindling models.

Conclusions: In conclusion, results can be explained by true therapeutic equivalence or insufficiency of the PTZ model to reveal differences among brands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Additive Anticonvulsive Effects of Sumatriptan and Morphine on Pentylenetetrazole-Induced Clonic Seizures in Mice. Cerebral Folate Transport Deficiency in 2 Cases with Intractable Myoclonic Epilepsy. Gyratory Seizures in Hypothalamic Hamartoma. Laughter-Induced Seizures: A Rare Type of Reflex Epilepsy. Medication Reconciliation Errors on Discharge for Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1