女性火器致命手段咨询:临床和研究考虑因素及行动呼吁。

Q1 Psychology Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-30 DOI:10.1007/s40501-022-00273-3
Talia L Spark, Chelsea M Cogan, Lindsey L Monteith, Joseph A Simonetti
{"title":"女性火器致命手段咨询:临床和研究考虑因素及行动呼吁。","authors":"Talia L Spark, Chelsea M Cogan, Lindsey L Monteith, Joseph A Simonetti","doi":"10.1007/s40501-022-00273-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Firearm injury is the leading mechanism of suicide among US women, and lethal means counseling (LMC) is an evidence-based suicide prevention intervention. We describe current knowledge and research gaps in tailoring LMC to meet the needs of US women.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Available LMC and firearm suicide prevention literature has not fully considered how LMC interventions should be tailored for women. This is especially important as firearm ownership and firearm-related suicides among women are increasing. Additional research is needed to better understand firearm characteristics, behaviors, and beliefs of US women, particularly related to perceptions of personal safety and history of trauma. Research is also needed to identify optimal components of LMC interventions (e.g., messengers, messages, settings) and how best to facilitate safety practices among women with firearm access who are not themselves firearm owners but who reside in households with firearms. Finally, it will be important to examine contextual and individual factors (e.g., rurality, veteran status, intimate partner violence) which may impact LMC preferences and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This commentary offers considerations for applying existing knowledge in LMC and firearm suicide prevention to clinical practice and research among US women, among whom the burden of firearm suicide is increasing.</p>","PeriodicalId":11088,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Firearm Lethal Means Counseling Among Women: Clinical and Research Considerations and a Call to Action.\",\"authors\":\"Talia L Spark, Chelsea M Cogan, Lindsey L Monteith, Joseph A Simonetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40501-022-00273-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Firearm injury is the leading mechanism of suicide among US women, and lethal means counseling (LMC) is an evidence-based suicide prevention intervention. We describe current knowledge and research gaps in tailoring LMC to meet the needs of US women.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Available LMC and firearm suicide prevention literature has not fully considered how LMC interventions should be tailored for women. This is especially important as firearm ownership and firearm-related suicides among women are increasing. Additional research is needed to better understand firearm characteristics, behaviors, and beliefs of US women, particularly related to perceptions of personal safety and history of trauma. Research is also needed to identify optimal components of LMC interventions (e.g., messengers, messages, settings) and how best to facilitate safety practices among women with firearm access who are not themselves firearm owners but who reside in households with firearms. Finally, it will be important to examine contextual and individual factors (e.g., rurality, veteran status, intimate partner violence) which may impact LMC preferences and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This commentary offers considerations for applying existing knowledge in LMC and firearm suicide prevention to clinical practice and research among US women, among whom the burden of firearm suicide is increasing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-022-00273-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-022-00273-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查目的:火器伤害是美国女性自杀的主要原因,而致命手段咨询(LMC)是一种基于证据的自杀预防干预措施。我们介绍了目前在定制 LMC 以满足美国女性需求方面的知识和研究缺口:现有的 LMC 和枪支自杀预防文献尚未充分考虑如何为女性量身定制 LMC 干预措施。这一点尤为重要,因为女性拥有枪支和与枪支相关的自杀事件正在增加。需要开展更多研究,以更好地了解美国女性的枪支特征、行为和信仰,特别是与个人安全意识和创伤史相关的内容。还需要开展研究,以确定 LMC 干预措施的最佳组成部分(如信使、信息、环境),以及如何以最佳方式促进本身不拥有枪支但居住在有枪支家庭中的可使用枪支妇女的安全实践。最后,研究可能影响 LMC 偏好和建议的环境和个人因素(如农村、退伍军人身份、亲密伴侣暴力)也很重要。摘要:本评论为将现有的 LMC 和枪支自杀预防知识应用于美国妇女的临床实践和研究提供了一些考虑因素,因为枪支自杀给美国妇女造成的负担越来越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Firearm Lethal Means Counseling Among Women: Clinical and Research Considerations and a Call to Action.

Purpose of review: Firearm injury is the leading mechanism of suicide among US women, and lethal means counseling (LMC) is an evidence-based suicide prevention intervention. We describe current knowledge and research gaps in tailoring LMC to meet the needs of US women.

Recent findings: Available LMC and firearm suicide prevention literature has not fully considered how LMC interventions should be tailored for women. This is especially important as firearm ownership and firearm-related suicides among women are increasing. Additional research is needed to better understand firearm characteristics, behaviors, and beliefs of US women, particularly related to perceptions of personal safety and history of trauma. Research is also needed to identify optimal components of LMC interventions (e.g., messengers, messages, settings) and how best to facilitate safety practices among women with firearm access who are not themselves firearm owners but who reside in households with firearms. Finally, it will be important to examine contextual and individual factors (e.g., rurality, veteran status, intimate partner violence) which may impact LMC preferences and recommendations.

Summary: This commentary offers considerations for applying existing knowledge in LMC and firearm suicide prevention to clinical practice and research among US women, among whom the burden of firearm suicide is increasing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: This journal focuses on the latest advances in the multifaceted treatment of psychiatric disorders. Designed for physicians and other mental health professionals, Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry offers expert reviews on the management of a range of mental health conditions, includingSchizophrenia and other psychotic disordersSubstance use disordersAnxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and related disordersMood disordersEating and other impulse control disordersPersonality disordersArticles cover a range of established and emerging treatment options across the lifespan, and their innovative, hands-on format makes them ideal for informing treatment decisions at the point of care.We accomplish this by appointing leaders in the field to serve as Section Editors in key areas. Section Editors, in turn, select the most pressing topics as well as experts to present the latest research, assess the efficacy of available treatment options, and discuss special considerations.Additionally, an international Editorial Board—representing a range of disciplines within psychiatry and psychology—ensures that the journal content includes current, emerging research and suggests articles of special interest to their country or region.
期刊最新文献
Modulating the Mitochondria for Mood Disorders: Emerging Evidence for Transcranial Photobiomodulation in Major Depressive Disorder Military Moral Injury: Current Controversies and Future Care Correction: Digital Interventions for Relapse Prevention, Illness Self‑Management, and Health Promotion In Schizophrenia: Recent Advances, Continued Challenges, and Future Opportunities Digital Interventions for Adolescents and Young Adults Experiencing Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Leveraging Digital Media to Promote Youth Mental Health: Flipping the Script on Social Media-Related Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1