新冠肺炎大流行背景下高校医院职工的风险认知、信息接收和职业投入

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Revista Espanola De Salud Publica Pub Date : 2022-10-20
Héctor Sánchez-Herrero, Dolors Montserrat-Capella, Manuel Revuelta-Zamorano, Almudena Santano-Magariño, Montserrat Solís-Muñoz, Almudena Santano-Magariño
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行背景下高校医院职工的风险认知、信息接收和职业投入","authors":"Héctor Sánchez-Herrero,&nbsp;Dolors Montserrat-Capella,&nbsp;Manuel Revuelta-Zamorano,&nbsp;Almudena Santano-Magariño,&nbsp;Montserrat Solís-Muñoz,&nbsp;Almudena Santano-Magariño","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hospital workers faced the pandemic with a lack of knowledge, procedures and resources, which generated different experiences based on the perceived risk of exposure. It was considered pertinent to conduct a study to learn about the risk perception, the information received and the occupational engagement of workers in a university hospital in the face of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study (july-september 2020) was carried out by an ad hoc survey of workers in the Majadahonda Puerta de Hierro University Hospital with 20 items (Likert scale from 0=not at all agree to 5=totally agree). The sample size was set at 828 workers. The absolute frequency and percentage of agreement for each item were described. Chi-Square was used to assess the association of responses with sex, type of worker, work area and activity in COVID-19 units.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>992 workers participated, with 80.7% being women, 79.8% healthcare personnel and 33.2% nurses. Workers perceived a high risk of exposure. Approximately half confirmed that they had received information on the use of masks, although not on PPE. More than half stated that they felt involved in teamwork, but not in COVID-19 unit planning. Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were found in the risk perception by sex, between type of worker (healthcare vs. non-healthcare), work area (healthcare vs. non-healthcare) and working in COVID-19 Units vs. non-COVID-19 Units.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare personnel who worked in care areas and COVID-19 units present greater perception of the risk of exposure, although they report a higher degree of agreement in the information received and in their work engagement in the face of the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":47152,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Risk perception, information received and occupational engagement of workers in a university hospital in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic.]\",\"authors\":\"Héctor Sánchez-Herrero,&nbsp;Dolors Montserrat-Capella,&nbsp;Manuel Revuelta-Zamorano,&nbsp;Almudena Santano-Magariño,&nbsp;Montserrat Solís-Muñoz,&nbsp;Almudena Santano-Magariño\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hospital workers faced the pandemic with a lack of knowledge, procedures and resources, which generated different experiences based on the perceived risk of exposure. It was considered pertinent to conduct a study to learn about the risk perception, the information received and the occupational engagement of workers in a university hospital in the face of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study (july-september 2020) was carried out by an ad hoc survey of workers in the Majadahonda Puerta de Hierro University Hospital with 20 items (Likert scale from 0=not at all agree to 5=totally agree). The sample size was set at 828 workers. The absolute frequency and percentage of agreement for each item were described. Chi-Square was used to assess the association of responses with sex, type of worker, work area and activity in COVID-19 units.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>992 workers participated, with 80.7% being women, 79.8% healthcare personnel and 33.2% nurses. Workers perceived a high risk of exposure. Approximately half confirmed that they had received information on the use of masks, although not on PPE. More than half stated that they felt involved in teamwork, but not in COVID-19 unit planning. Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were found in the risk perception by sex, between type of worker (healthcare vs. non-healthcare), work area (healthcare vs. non-healthcare) and working in COVID-19 Units vs. non-COVID-19 Units.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare personnel who worked in care areas and COVID-19 units present greater perception of the risk of exposure, although they report a higher degree of agreement in the information received and in their work engagement in the face of the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:医院工作人员在面对大流行时缺乏知识、程序和资源,这根据对暴露风险的感知产生了不同的体验。人们认为有必要开展一项研究,了解一所大学医院的工作人员在面对大流行病时对风险的认识、收到的信息和职业参与情况。方法:采用横断面研究(2020年7 - 9月),对Majadahonda Puerta de Hierro大学医院的工作人员进行了一项20项(李克特量表从0=完全不同意到5=完全同意)的特别调查。样本量设定为828名工人。描述了每个项目的绝对频率和同意百分比。采用卡方法评估应答与COVID-19单位的性别、工作人员类型、工作区域和活动之间的关系。结果:职工992人,其中女性80.7%,医务人员79.8%,护士33.2%。工人们意识到暴露的风险很高。大约一半的人证实,他们收到了关于使用口罩的信息,但没有收到关于个人防护装备的信息。超过一半的人表示,他们觉得自己参与了团队合作,但没有参与COVID-19的单位规划。结论:在护理区和COVID-19单位工作的医护人员对暴露风险的感知更高,尽管他们在收到的信息和面对大流行的工作投入方面报告的一致性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Risk perception, information received and occupational engagement of workers in a university hospital in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic.]

Objective: Hospital workers faced the pandemic with a lack of knowledge, procedures and resources, which generated different experiences based on the perceived risk of exposure. It was considered pertinent to conduct a study to learn about the risk perception, the information received and the occupational engagement of workers in a university hospital in the face of the pandemic.

Methods: A cross-sectional study (july-september 2020) was carried out by an ad hoc survey of workers in the Majadahonda Puerta de Hierro University Hospital with 20 items (Likert scale from 0=not at all agree to 5=totally agree). The sample size was set at 828 workers. The absolute frequency and percentage of agreement for each item were described. Chi-Square was used to assess the association of responses with sex, type of worker, work area and activity in COVID-19 units.

Results: 992 workers participated, with 80.7% being women, 79.8% healthcare personnel and 33.2% nurses. Workers perceived a high risk of exposure. Approximately half confirmed that they had received information on the use of masks, although not on PPE. More than half stated that they felt involved in teamwork, but not in COVID-19 unit planning. Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were found in the risk perception by sex, between type of worker (healthcare vs. non-healthcare), work area (healthcare vs. non-healthcare) and working in COVID-19 Units vs. non-COVID-19 Units.

Conclusions: Healthcare personnel who worked in care areas and COVID-19 units present greater perception of the risk of exposure, although they report a higher degree of agreement in the information received and in their work engagement in the face of the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Recommendations for the patient during the treatment of colorectal cancer through the enhanced recovery.] [Chemical pollution, exposome and health in the Canary Islands population: An assessment of the situation.] [World Breastfeeding Week 2022: a call for deliberation.] [COVID-19 exposure setting, social and gender determinants in a mediterranean region.] [Effect of prebiotics, probiotics, and symbiotics on molecular markers of inflammation in obesity.]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1