欢乐隔离:培养远距离共处。

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Qualitative Sociology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-28 DOI:10.1007/s11133-022-09512-8
Nicholas Bascuñan-Wiley, Michaela DeSoucey, Gary Alan Fine
{"title":"欢乐隔离:培养远距离共处。","authors":"Nicholas Bascuñan-Wiley,&nbsp;Michaela DeSoucey,&nbsp;Gary Alan Fine","doi":"10.1007/s11133-022-09512-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sociology's focus on sociality and co-presence has long oriented studies of commensality-the social dimension of eating together. This literature commonly prioritizes face-to-face interactions and takes physical proximity for granted. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 largely halted in-person gatherings and altered everyday foodways. Consequently, many people turned to <i>digital commensality</i>, cooking and eating together through video-call technology such as Zoom and FaceTime. We explore the implications of these new foodways and ask: has digital commensality helped cultivate co-presence amidst pandemic-induced physical separation? If so, how? To address these questions, we analyze two forms of qualitative data collected by the first author: interviews with individuals who cooked and ate together at a distance since March 2020 and digital ethnography during different groups' online food events (e.g., happy hours, dinners, holiday gatherings, and birthday celebrations). Digital commensality helps foster a sense of co-presence and social connectedness at a distance. Specifically, participants use three temporally oriented strategies to create or maintain co-presence: they draw on pre-pandemic pasts and reinvent culinary traditions to meet new circumstances; they creatively adapt novel digital foodways through online dining; and they actively imagine post-pandemic futures where physically proximate commensality is again possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":47710,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330930/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convivial Quarantines: Cultivating Co-presence at a Distance.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Bascuñan-Wiley,&nbsp;Michaela DeSoucey,&nbsp;Gary Alan Fine\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11133-022-09512-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sociology's focus on sociality and co-presence has long oriented studies of commensality-the social dimension of eating together. This literature commonly prioritizes face-to-face interactions and takes physical proximity for granted. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 largely halted in-person gatherings and altered everyday foodways. Consequently, many people turned to <i>digital commensality</i>, cooking and eating together through video-call technology such as Zoom and FaceTime. We explore the implications of these new foodways and ask: has digital commensality helped cultivate co-presence amidst pandemic-induced physical separation? If so, how? To address these questions, we analyze two forms of qualitative data collected by the first author: interviews with individuals who cooked and ate together at a distance since March 2020 and digital ethnography during different groups' online food events (e.g., happy hours, dinners, holiday gatherings, and birthday celebrations). Digital commensality helps foster a sense of co-presence and social connectedness at a distance. Specifically, participants use three temporally oriented strategies to create or maintain co-presence: they draw on pre-pandemic pasts and reinvent culinary traditions to meet new circumstances; they creatively adapt novel digital foodways through online dining; and they actively imagine post-pandemic futures where physically proximate commensality is again possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330930/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-022-09512-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-022-09512-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

社会学对社会性和共同存在的关注长期以来一直以共栖性为导向——一起吃饭的社会维度。这些文献通常优先考虑面对面的互动,并认为身体上的接近是理所当然的。2020年3月爆发的COVID-19大流行在很大程度上中断了面对面的聚会,并改变了日常饮食方式。因此,许多人转向数字共享,通过Zoom和FaceTime等视频通话技术一起做饭和吃饭。我们探讨了这些新食物方式的影响,并提出了这样的问题:在大流行导致的物理隔离中,数字共栖是否有助于培养共同存在?如果有,怎么做?为了解决这些问题,我们分析了第一作者收集的两种形式的定性数据:对自2020年3月以来远距离一起做饭和吃饭的人的采访,以及不同群体在线食品活动(如欢乐时光、晚餐、假日聚会和生日庆祝活动)期间的数字人种学。数字共享有助于培养远距离的共同存在感和社会联系感。具体而言,参与者使用三种面向时间的策略来创建或维持共同存在:他们借鉴大流行前的历史,重塑烹饪传统以适应新的环境;他们通过在线用餐创造性地适应了新颖的数字美食方式;他们积极想象大流行后的未来,在那里,身体上接近的共栖性再次成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Convivial Quarantines: Cultivating Co-presence at a Distance.

Sociology's focus on sociality and co-presence has long oriented studies of commensality-the social dimension of eating together. This literature commonly prioritizes face-to-face interactions and takes physical proximity for granted. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 largely halted in-person gatherings and altered everyday foodways. Consequently, many people turned to digital commensality, cooking and eating together through video-call technology such as Zoom and FaceTime. We explore the implications of these new foodways and ask: has digital commensality helped cultivate co-presence amidst pandemic-induced physical separation? If so, how? To address these questions, we analyze two forms of qualitative data collected by the first author: interviews with individuals who cooked and ate together at a distance since March 2020 and digital ethnography during different groups' online food events (e.g., happy hours, dinners, holiday gatherings, and birthday celebrations). Digital commensality helps foster a sense of co-presence and social connectedness at a distance. Specifically, participants use three temporally oriented strategies to create or maintain co-presence: they draw on pre-pandemic pasts and reinvent culinary traditions to meet new circumstances; they creatively adapt novel digital foodways through online dining; and they actively imagine post-pandemic futures where physically proximate commensality is again possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Qualitative Sociology is dedicated to the qualitative interpretation and analysis of social life. The journal does not restrict theoretical or analytical orientation and welcomes manuscripts based on research methods such as interviewing, participant observation, ethnography, historical analysis, content analysis and others which do not rely primarily on numerical data.
期刊最新文献
The Moral Work of Participation: Disillusio, Expertise, and Urban Planning Under Neoliberalism Civic Opportunities and Democratic Practices in Yemen and Libya after the Arab Spring Gang Rule(s): Towards a Political Economy of Youth Gang Dynamics in Nicaragua Labor Borders: Recruitment of Central American Migrants in “Exodus” through Southern Mexico and Indigenous Mexican “Braceros” in the Californian Fields Ideological Consolidation, Subject Formation, and the Discursive Creation of the “New Woman” in Revolutionary Cuba
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1