经导管主动脉瓣置换术中冠状动脉疾病的处理。

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart International Pub Date : 2020-04-15 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.17925/HI.2020.14.1.24
Natraj Katta, J Dawn Abbott, Ankur Kalra, Fawaz Alenezi, Andrew Goldsweig, Herbert Aronow, Poonam Velagapudi
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣置换术中冠状动脉疾病的处理。","authors":"Natraj Katta,&nbsp;J Dawn Abbott,&nbsp;Ankur Kalra,&nbsp;Fawaz Alenezi,&nbsp;Andrew Goldsweig,&nbsp;Herbert Aronow,&nbsp;Poonam Velagapudi","doi":"10.17925/HI.2020.14.1.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently co-exist, as they share a common pathophysiology and risk factors. Due to lack of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and exclusion of significant CAD in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) trials, the optimal method of revascularisation of CAD in patients undergoing TAVR remains unknown. Observational studies and meta-analyses have shown varied results in outcomes for patients with CAD undergoing TAVR, and no significant difference in post-TAVR outcomes in patients who underwent revascularisation either prior to or during TAVR versus those who did not. However, some observational studies have shown that patients with lower residual SYNTAX score (rSS) post-revascularisation have better outcomes post-TAVR compared to those with higher rSS. RCTs are needed to clearly understand whether revascularisation is beneficial in these patients. Until then, management of CAD in patients undergoing TAVR must be individualised based on discussion with the heart team.</p>","PeriodicalId":12836,"journal":{"name":"Heart International","volume":"14 1","pages":"24-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524713/pdf/heart-int-14-24.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Coronary Artery Disease in the Setting of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.\",\"authors\":\"Natraj Katta,&nbsp;J Dawn Abbott,&nbsp;Ankur Kalra,&nbsp;Fawaz Alenezi,&nbsp;Andrew Goldsweig,&nbsp;Herbert Aronow,&nbsp;Poonam Velagapudi\",\"doi\":\"10.17925/HI.2020.14.1.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently co-exist, as they share a common pathophysiology and risk factors. Due to lack of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and exclusion of significant CAD in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) trials, the optimal method of revascularisation of CAD in patients undergoing TAVR remains unknown. Observational studies and meta-analyses have shown varied results in outcomes for patients with CAD undergoing TAVR, and no significant difference in post-TAVR outcomes in patients who underwent revascularisation either prior to or during TAVR versus those who did not. However, some observational studies have shown that patients with lower residual SYNTAX score (rSS) post-revascularisation have better outcomes post-TAVR compared to those with higher rSS. RCTs are needed to clearly understand whether revascularisation is beneficial in these patients. Until then, management of CAD in patients undergoing TAVR must be individualised based on discussion with the heart team.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart International\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"24-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524713/pdf/heart-int-14-24.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17925/HI.2020.14.1.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/HI.2020.14.1.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

主动脉瓣狭窄和冠状动脉疾病(CAD)经常共存,因为它们具有共同的病理生理和危险因素。由于缺乏随机对照试验(RCTs)和经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)试验中排除了显著的CAD,对接受TAVR的患者进行CAD血运重建的最佳方法仍然未知。观察性研究和荟萃分析显示,CAD患者接受TAVR的结果不同,在TAVR之前或期间接受血管重建术的患者与未接受TAVR的患者在TAVR后的结果没有显著差异。然而,一些观察性研究表明,血运重建后残留句法评分(rSS)较低的患者与rSS较高的患者相比,tavr后的预后更好。需要随机对照试验来清楚地了解血运重建对这些患者是否有益。在此之前,TAVR患者的CAD管理必须在与心脏团队讨论的基础上进行个体化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management of Coronary Artery Disease in the Setting of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently co-exist, as they share a common pathophysiology and risk factors. Due to lack of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and exclusion of significant CAD in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) trials, the optimal method of revascularisation of CAD in patients undergoing TAVR remains unknown. Observational studies and meta-analyses have shown varied results in outcomes for patients with CAD undergoing TAVR, and no significant difference in post-TAVR outcomes in patients who underwent revascularisation either prior to or during TAVR versus those who did not. However, some observational studies have shown that patients with lower residual SYNTAX score (rSS) post-revascularisation have better outcomes post-TAVR compared to those with higher rSS. RCTs are needed to clearly understand whether revascularisation is beneficial in these patients. Until then, management of CAD in patients undergoing TAVR must be individualised based on discussion with the heart team.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart International
Heart International Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Commonly Used 3D Mapping Systems in Acute Success Rates of Catheter Ablation Procedures. Evolution of Disease-modifying Therapy for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis. Femoral Neck Osteoporosis Is Associated with a Higher Odds of Coronary Artery Disease in Indian Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-sectional Study from a Teaching Hospital in Southern India. Cardiovascular Implications of Semaglutide in Obesity Management: Redefining Cardiovascular Health Strategies. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the NAVITOR Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1