{"title":"改善初级保健中的抑郁症筛查。","authors":"Marlene Lindsay, Veronica B Decker","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-2021-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression is a serious problem in the United States. It not only impacts chronic illness and healthcare utilization, but it can also result in death, intentional or unintentional. Despite the seriousness associated with depression, it continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated. The primary care setting provides an ideal location to screen and initiate treatment for depression in individuals who would otherwise not be screened.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this evidence-based practice project was to improve the diagnosis and treatment of depression in an adult primary care office.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An intervention consisting of a HealthWatcher reminder for depression screening, the administration of the PHQ-9 instrument, and a treatment algorithm was incorporated into the office workflow. The charts of a pre-intervention random sample were compared to a post-intervention random sample to test for significant differences in depression screening and treatment rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the chi-squared test, the post-intervention sample screening rate was significantly higher than pre-intervention sample rate (90% vs 23.3%; χ<sup>2</sup> = 54.3, <i>df</i> = 1, <i>P</i> < .000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications: </strong>It is feasible to improve the diagnosis and treatment of depression for adult primary care patients by modifying office protocols and using the PHQ-9 screening instrument and a treatment algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":"15 2","pages":"84-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Depression Screening in Primary Care.\",\"authors\":\"Marlene Lindsay, Veronica B Decker\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JDNP-2021-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression is a serious problem in the United States. It not only impacts chronic illness and healthcare utilization, but it can also result in death, intentional or unintentional. Despite the seriousness associated with depression, it continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated. The primary care setting provides an ideal location to screen and initiate treatment for depression in individuals who would otherwise not be screened.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this evidence-based practice project was to improve the diagnosis and treatment of depression in an adult primary care office.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An intervention consisting of a HealthWatcher reminder for depression screening, the administration of the PHQ-9 instrument, and a treatment algorithm was incorporated into the office workflow. The charts of a pre-intervention random sample were compared to a post-intervention random sample to test for significant differences in depression screening and treatment rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the chi-squared test, the post-intervention sample screening rate was significantly higher than pre-intervention sample rate (90% vs 23.3%; χ<sup>2</sup> = 54.3, <i>df</i> = 1, <i>P</i> < .000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications: </strong>It is feasible to improve the diagnosis and treatment of depression for adult primary care patients by modifying office protocols and using the PHQ-9 screening instrument and a treatment algorithm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"84-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2021-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2021-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:抑郁症在美国是一个严重的问题。它不仅影响慢性疾病和医疗保健利用,而且还可能导致有意或无意的死亡。尽管抑郁症很严重,但它仍然没有得到充分的诊断和治疗。初级保健设置提供了一个理想的位置,以筛选和开始治疗抑郁症的个人,否则不会筛选。目的:本循证实践项目的目的是提高成人初级保健办公室抑郁症的诊断和治疗。方法:将HealthWatcher提示抑郁症筛查、PHQ-9仪器的使用和治疗算法纳入办公室工作流程。将干预前随机样本的图表与干预后随机样本的图表进行比较,以检验抑郁症筛查和治疗率的显着差异。结果:经卡方检验,干预后样本筛检率显著高于干预前样本筛检率(90% vs 23.3%;χ2 = 54.3, df = 1, P < .000)。结论/意义:修改办公室方案,采用PHQ-9筛查仪和治疗算法,改善成人初级保健患者抑郁症的诊断和治疗是可行的。
Background: Depression is a serious problem in the United States. It not only impacts chronic illness and healthcare utilization, but it can also result in death, intentional or unintentional. Despite the seriousness associated with depression, it continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated. The primary care setting provides an ideal location to screen and initiate treatment for depression in individuals who would otherwise not be screened.
Objective: The objective of this evidence-based practice project was to improve the diagnosis and treatment of depression in an adult primary care office.
Method: An intervention consisting of a HealthWatcher reminder for depression screening, the administration of the PHQ-9 instrument, and a treatment algorithm was incorporated into the office workflow. The charts of a pre-intervention random sample were compared to a post-intervention random sample to test for significant differences in depression screening and treatment rates.
Results: Using the chi-squared test, the post-intervention sample screening rate was significantly higher than pre-intervention sample rate (90% vs 23.3%; χ2 = 54.3, df = 1, P < .000).
Conclusion/implications: It is feasible to improve the diagnosis and treatment of depression for adult primary care patients by modifying office protocols and using the PHQ-9 screening instrument and a treatment algorithm.