新的计算模型为评估化学品的眼睛刺激和腐蚀潜力提供了替代动物试验的方法

Arthur C. Silva , Joyce V.V.B. Borba , Vinicius M. Alves , Steven U.S. Hall , Nicholas Furnham , Nicole Kleinstreuer , Eugene Muratov , Alexander Tropsha , Carolina Horta Andrade
{"title":"新的计算模型为评估化学品的眼睛刺激和腐蚀潜力提供了替代动物试验的方法","authors":"Arthur C. Silva ,&nbsp;Joyce V.V.B. Borba ,&nbsp;Vinicius M. Alves ,&nbsp;Steven U.S. Hall ,&nbsp;Nicholas Furnham ,&nbsp;Nicole Kleinstreuer ,&nbsp;Eugene Muratov ,&nbsp;Alexander Tropsha ,&nbsp;Carolina Horta Andrade","doi":"10.1016/j.ailsci.2021.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Eye irritation and corrosion are fundamental considerations in developing chemicals to be used in or near the eye, from cleaning products to ophthalmic solutions. Unfortunately, animal testing is currently the standard method to identify compounds that cause eye irritation or corrosion. Yet, there is growing pressure on the part of regulatory agencies both in the USA and abroad to develop New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) that help reduce the need for animal testing and address unmet need to modernize safety evaluation of chemical hazards. In furthering the development and applications of computational NAMs in chemical safety assessment, in this study we have collected the largest expertly curated dataset of compounds tested for eye irritation and corrosion, and employed this data to build and validate binary and multi-classification Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) models that can reliably assess eye irritation/corrosion potential of novel untested compounds. QSAR models were generated with Random Forest (RF) and Multi-Descriptor Read Across (MuDRA) machine learning (ML) methods, and validated using a 5-fold external cross-validation protocol. These models demonstrated high balanced accuracy (CCR of 0.68–0.88), sensitivity (SE of 0.61–0.84), positive predictive value (PPV of 0.65–0.90), specificity (SP of 0.56–0.91), and negative predictive value (NPV of 0.68–0.85). Overall, MuDRA models outperformed RF models and were applied to predict compounds’ irritation/corrosion potential from the Inactive Ingredient Database, which contains components present in FDA-approved drug products, and from the Cosmetic Ingredient Database, the European Commission source of information on cosmetic substances. All models built and validated in this study are publicly available at the STopTox web portal (<span>https://stoptox.mml.unc.edu/</span><svg><path></path></svg>). These models can be employed as reliable tools for identifying potential eye irritant/corrosive compounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72304,"journal":{"name":"Artificial intelligence in the life sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355119/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel computational models offer alternatives to animal testing for assessing eye irritation and corrosion potential of chemicals\",\"authors\":\"Arthur C. Silva ,&nbsp;Joyce V.V.B. Borba ,&nbsp;Vinicius M. Alves ,&nbsp;Steven U.S. Hall ,&nbsp;Nicholas Furnham ,&nbsp;Nicole Kleinstreuer ,&nbsp;Eugene Muratov ,&nbsp;Alexander Tropsha ,&nbsp;Carolina Horta Andrade\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ailsci.2021.100028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Eye irritation and corrosion are fundamental considerations in developing chemicals to be used in or near the eye, from cleaning products to ophthalmic solutions. Unfortunately, animal testing is currently the standard method to identify compounds that cause eye irritation or corrosion. Yet, there is growing pressure on the part of regulatory agencies both in the USA and abroad to develop New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) that help reduce the need for animal testing and address unmet need to modernize safety evaluation of chemical hazards. In furthering the development and applications of computational NAMs in chemical safety assessment, in this study we have collected the largest expertly curated dataset of compounds tested for eye irritation and corrosion, and employed this data to build and validate binary and multi-classification Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) models that can reliably assess eye irritation/corrosion potential of novel untested compounds. QSAR models were generated with Random Forest (RF) and Multi-Descriptor Read Across (MuDRA) machine learning (ML) methods, and validated using a 5-fold external cross-validation protocol. These models demonstrated high balanced accuracy (CCR of 0.68–0.88), sensitivity (SE of 0.61–0.84), positive predictive value (PPV of 0.65–0.90), specificity (SP of 0.56–0.91), and negative predictive value (NPV of 0.68–0.85). Overall, MuDRA models outperformed RF models and were applied to predict compounds’ irritation/corrosion potential from the Inactive Ingredient Database, which contains components present in FDA-approved drug products, and from the Cosmetic Ingredient Database, the European Commission source of information on cosmetic substances. All models built and validated in this study are publicly available at the STopTox web portal (<span>https://stoptox.mml.unc.edu/</span><svg><path></path></svg>). These models can be employed as reliable tools for identifying potential eye irritant/corrosive compounds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial intelligence in the life sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355119/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial intelligence in the life sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667318521000283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial intelligence in the life sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667318521000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

从清洁产品到眼科溶液,在开发用于眼睛或眼睛附近的化学品时,眼睛刺激和腐蚀是基本考虑因素。不幸的是,动物试验目前是鉴定引起眼睛刺激或腐蚀的化合物的标准方法。然而,美国和国外的监管机构面临越来越大的压力,要求开发新的方法方法(NAMs),以帮助减少对动物试验的需求,并解决未满足的化学品危害安全评估现代化需求。为了进一步发展和应用计算NAMs在化学安全评估中的应用,在本研究中,我们收集了最大的专家整理的化合物的眼睛刺激和腐蚀测试数据集,并利用这些数据建立和验证二元和多分类的定量结构-活性关系(QSAR)模型,该模型可以可靠地评估新的未经测试的化合物的眼睛刺激/腐蚀潜力。使用随机森林(RF)和多描述符跨读(MuDRA)机器学习(ML)方法生成QSAR模型,并使用5倍外部交叉验证协议进行验证。这些模型具有较高的平衡准确性(CCR为0.68 ~ 0.88)、敏感性(SE为0.61 ~ 0.84)、阳性预测值(PPV为0.65 ~ 0.90)、特异性(SP为0.56 ~ 0.91)和阴性预测值(NPV为0.68 ~ 0.85)。总体而言,MuDRA模型优于RF模型,并应用于预测来自非活性成分数据库(包含fda批准的药品中存在的成分)和化妆品成分数据库(欧盟委员会化妆品物质信息来源)的化合物的刺激/腐蚀电位。在这项研究中建立和验证的所有模型都可以在STopTox网站上公开获得(https://stoptox.mml.unc.edu/)。这些模型可以作为识别潜在的眼睛刺激性/腐蚀性化合物的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel computational models offer alternatives to animal testing for assessing eye irritation and corrosion potential of chemicals

Eye irritation and corrosion are fundamental considerations in developing chemicals to be used in or near the eye, from cleaning products to ophthalmic solutions. Unfortunately, animal testing is currently the standard method to identify compounds that cause eye irritation or corrosion. Yet, there is growing pressure on the part of regulatory agencies both in the USA and abroad to develop New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) that help reduce the need for animal testing and address unmet need to modernize safety evaluation of chemical hazards. In furthering the development and applications of computational NAMs in chemical safety assessment, in this study we have collected the largest expertly curated dataset of compounds tested for eye irritation and corrosion, and employed this data to build and validate binary and multi-classification Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) models that can reliably assess eye irritation/corrosion potential of novel untested compounds. QSAR models were generated with Random Forest (RF) and Multi-Descriptor Read Across (MuDRA) machine learning (ML) methods, and validated using a 5-fold external cross-validation protocol. These models demonstrated high balanced accuracy (CCR of 0.68–0.88), sensitivity (SE of 0.61–0.84), positive predictive value (PPV of 0.65–0.90), specificity (SP of 0.56–0.91), and negative predictive value (NPV of 0.68–0.85). Overall, MuDRA models outperformed RF models and were applied to predict compounds’ irritation/corrosion potential from the Inactive Ingredient Database, which contains components present in FDA-approved drug products, and from the Cosmetic Ingredient Database, the European Commission source of information on cosmetic substances. All models built and validated in this study are publicly available at the STopTox web portal (https://stoptox.mml.unc.edu/). These models can be employed as reliable tools for identifying potential eye irritant/corrosive compounds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial intelligence in the life sciences
Artificial intelligence in the life sciences Pharmacology, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (General), Computer Science Applications, Health Informatics, Drug Discovery, Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine (General)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 days
期刊最新文献
Pharmacological profiles of neglected tropical disease drugs DTA Atlas: A massive-scale drug repurposing database Modeling PROTAC degradation activity with machine learning Machine learning proteochemometric models for Cereblon glue activity predictions Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1