重复经颅磁刺激治疗创伤性脑损伤的神经性疼痛和神经精神症状:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Neural Plasticity Pub Date : 2022-07-30 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/2036736
Xin Li, Tijiang Lu, Hong Yu, Jie Shen, Zhengquan Chen, Xiaoyan Yang, Zefan Huang, Yuqi Yang, Yufei Feng, Xuan Zhou, Qing Du
{"title":"重复经颅磁刺激治疗创伤性脑损伤的神经性疼痛和神经精神症状:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xin Li,&nbsp;Tijiang Lu,&nbsp;Hong Yu,&nbsp;Jie Shen,&nbsp;Zhengquan Chen,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Yang,&nbsp;Zefan Huang,&nbsp;Yuqi Yang,&nbsp;Yufei Feng,&nbsp;Xuan Zhou,&nbsp;Qing Du","doi":"10.1155/2022/2036736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuropathic pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms are common complications reported by the traumatic brain injury (TBI) population. Although a growing body of research has indicated the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the management of neurological and psychiatric disorders, little evidence has been presented to support the effects of rTMS on neuropathic pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with TBI in all age groups. In addition, a better understanding of the potential factors that might influence the therapeutic effect of rTMS is necessary. The objective of this preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify the effects of rTMS on physical and psychological symptoms in individuals with TBI. We systematically searched six databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS in TBI patients reporting pain and neuropsychiatric outcomes published until March 20, 2022. The mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was estimated separately for outcomes to understand the mean effect size. Twelve RCTs with 276 TBI patients were ultimately selected from 1605 records for systematic review, and 11 of the studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, five of the included studies showed a low risk of bias. The effects of rTMS on neuropathic pain were statistically significant (MD = -1.00, 95% CI -1.76 to -0.25, <i>P</i> = 0.009), with high heterogeneity (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 76%). A significant advantage of 1 Hz rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in improving depression (MD = -6.52, 95% CI -11.58 to -1.46, <i>P</i> = 0.01) was shown, and a significant improvement was noted in the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire-13 (RPQ-13) scores of mild TBI patients after rTMS (MD = -5.87, 95% CI -10.63 to -1.11, <i>P</i> = 0.02). However, no significance was found in cognition measurement. No major adverse events related to rTMS were reported. Moderate evidence suggests that rTMS can effectively and safely improve neuropathic pain, while its effectiveness on depression, postconcussion symptoms, and cognition is limited. More trials with a larger number of participants are needed to draw firm conclusions. This trial is registered with PROSPERO (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021242364.</p>","PeriodicalId":19122,"journal":{"name":"Neural Plasticity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357260/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Li,&nbsp;Tijiang Lu,&nbsp;Hong Yu,&nbsp;Jie Shen,&nbsp;Zhengquan Chen,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Yang,&nbsp;Zefan Huang,&nbsp;Yuqi Yang,&nbsp;Yufei Feng,&nbsp;Xuan Zhou,&nbsp;Qing Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/2036736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neuropathic pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms are common complications reported by the traumatic brain injury (TBI) population. Although a growing body of research has indicated the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the management of neurological and psychiatric disorders, little evidence has been presented to support the effects of rTMS on neuropathic pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with TBI in all age groups. In addition, a better understanding of the potential factors that might influence the therapeutic effect of rTMS is necessary. The objective of this preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify the effects of rTMS on physical and psychological symptoms in individuals with TBI. We systematically searched six databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS in TBI patients reporting pain and neuropsychiatric outcomes published until March 20, 2022. The mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was estimated separately for outcomes to understand the mean effect size. Twelve RCTs with 276 TBI patients were ultimately selected from 1605 records for systematic review, and 11 of the studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, five of the included studies showed a low risk of bias. The effects of rTMS on neuropathic pain were statistically significant (MD = -1.00, 95% CI -1.76 to -0.25, <i>P</i> = 0.009), with high heterogeneity (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 76%). A significant advantage of 1 Hz rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in improving depression (MD = -6.52, 95% CI -11.58 to -1.46, <i>P</i> = 0.01) was shown, and a significant improvement was noted in the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire-13 (RPQ-13) scores of mild TBI patients after rTMS (MD = -5.87, 95% CI -10.63 to -1.11, <i>P</i> = 0.02). However, no significance was found in cognition measurement. No major adverse events related to rTMS were reported. Moderate evidence suggests that rTMS can effectively and safely improve neuropathic pain, while its effectiveness on depression, postconcussion symptoms, and cognition is limited. More trials with a larger number of participants are needed to draw firm conclusions. This trial is registered with PROSPERO (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021242364.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neural Plasticity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357260/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neural Plasticity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2036736\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Plasticity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2036736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

神经性疼痛和神经精神症状是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)人群中常见的并发症。尽管越来越多的研究表明重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对神经和精神疾病的治疗有效,但几乎没有证据支持rTMS对所有年龄组TBI患者的神经性疼痛和神经精神症状的影响。此外,更好地了解可能影响rTMS治疗效果的潜在因素是必要的。这项预登记的系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是量化rTMS对TBI患者身体和心理症状的影响。我们系统地检索了6个数据库,检索了截至2022年3月20日发表的rTMS在报告疼痛和神经精神预后的TBI患者中的随机对照试验(rct)。分别估计结果的95%置信区间(ci)的平均差异(MD),以了解平均效应大小。最终从1605份记录中选择了12项随机对照试验,共276例TBI患者进行系统评价,其中11项研究纳入meta分析。总体而言,纳入的研究中有5项显示偏倚风险较低。rTMS对神经性疼痛的影响有统计学意义(MD = -1.00, 95% CI -1.76 ~ -0.25, P = 0.009),异质性高(I 2 = 76%)。1 Hz rTMS比右背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)在改善抑郁方面有显著优势(MD = -6.52, 95% CI -11.58 ~ -1.46, P = 0.01),轻度TBI患者rTMS后Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷-13 (RPQ-13)评分显著改善(MD = -5.87, 95% CI -10.63 ~ -1.11, P = 0.02)。然而,在认知测量中没有发现显著性。未发现与rTMS相关的重大不良事件。中度证据表明,rTMS可以有效、安全地改善神经性疼痛,但其对抑郁、脑震荡后症状和认知的效果有限。要得出确切的结论,还需要更多参与者参与的试验。该试验在普洛斯彼罗注册(普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42021242364)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Neuropathic pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms are common complications reported by the traumatic brain injury (TBI) population. Although a growing body of research has indicated the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the management of neurological and psychiatric disorders, little evidence has been presented to support the effects of rTMS on neuropathic pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with TBI in all age groups. In addition, a better understanding of the potential factors that might influence the therapeutic effect of rTMS is necessary. The objective of this preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify the effects of rTMS on physical and psychological symptoms in individuals with TBI. We systematically searched six databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS in TBI patients reporting pain and neuropsychiatric outcomes published until March 20, 2022. The mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was estimated separately for outcomes to understand the mean effect size. Twelve RCTs with 276 TBI patients were ultimately selected from 1605 records for systematic review, and 11 of the studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, five of the included studies showed a low risk of bias. The effects of rTMS on neuropathic pain were statistically significant (MD = -1.00, 95% CI -1.76 to -0.25, P = 0.009), with high heterogeneity (I 2 = 76%). A significant advantage of 1 Hz rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in improving depression (MD = -6.52, 95% CI -11.58 to -1.46, P = 0.01) was shown, and a significant improvement was noted in the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire-13 (RPQ-13) scores of mild TBI patients after rTMS (MD = -5.87, 95% CI -10.63 to -1.11, P = 0.02). However, no significance was found in cognition measurement. No major adverse events related to rTMS were reported. Moderate evidence suggests that rTMS can effectively and safely improve neuropathic pain, while its effectiveness on depression, postconcussion symptoms, and cognition is limited. More trials with a larger number of participants are needed to draw firm conclusions. This trial is registered with PROSPERO (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021242364.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neural Plasticity
Neural Plasticity Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Neural Plasticity is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles related to all aspects of neural plasticity, with special emphasis on its functional significance as reflected in behavior and in psychopathology. Neural Plasticity publishes research and review articles from the entire range of relevant disciplines, including basic neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, biological psychology, and biological psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Modulation of High-Frequency rTMS on Reward Circuitry in Individuals with Nicotine Dependence: A Preliminary fMRI Study. Identifying ADHD-Related Abnormal Functional Connectivity with a Graph Convolutional Neural Network The Application of tDCS to Treat Pain and Psychocognitive Symptoms in Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review Clinical Comparison between HD-tDCS and tDCS for Improving Upper Limb Motor Function: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Trial The Alterations in the Brain Corresponding to Low Back Pain: Recent Insights and Advances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1