加拿大表面活化剂微创疗法调查。

0 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Pub Date : 2022-07-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.29390/cjrt-2022-011
Shaily Brahmbhatt, Brooke Read, Orlando Da Silva, Soume Bhattacharya
{"title":"加拿大表面活化剂微创疗法调查。","authors":"Shaily Brahmbhatt, Brooke Read, Orlando Da Silva, Soume Bhattacharya","doi":"10.29390/cjrt-2022-011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) can be used to treat neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Clinical and institutional variances in MIST utilization persist globally with little published research regarding MIST utilization in Canada. Therefore, the objective of this study was to survey MIST utilization in NICUs in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was emailed to the 33 participating centres of Canadian Neonatal Network<sup>TM</sup> (CNN) Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality (EPIQ) Lung Health Group (LHG). Site demographics and surfactant therapy procedural details were categorically collected. Free text and multiple-choice questions were utilized to capture perceived barriers and individual preferences for MIST use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight of 33 participating members of the CNN EPIQ-LHG completed the survey between April 2021 and October 2021 (85%); 17/28 (61%) respondents reported ongoing MIST utilization at their center. Most centers that used MIST techniques administered bovine lipid extract surfactant (68%), commonly using angiocatheters (47%) and purpose-built catheters (41%). MIST was widely used for patients at 26-33 weeks gestational age (88%). Nine centres had never used MIST (32%), and 3 indicated a plan to implement MIST within the next 2 years. Common barriers to MIST use included lack of consensus amongst clinicians (78%), lack of training (56%), and lack of experience with MIST (56%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While MIST is being increasingly used in Canadian NICUs, universal use is yet to be seen. Clinician inexperience and lack of consensus, formal training, and local guidelines contribute to underutilization of MIST. Training workshops, country-wide data collection, and uniform operating protocols are needed to standardize practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":39373,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"122-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/57/00/cjrt-2022-011.PMC9333198.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Shaily Brahmbhatt, Brooke Read, Orlando Da Silva, Soume Bhattacharya\",\"doi\":\"10.29390/cjrt-2022-011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) can be used to treat neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Clinical and institutional variances in MIST utilization persist globally with little published research regarding MIST utilization in Canada. Therefore, the objective of this study was to survey MIST utilization in NICUs in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was emailed to the 33 participating centres of Canadian Neonatal Network<sup>TM</sup> (CNN) Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality (EPIQ) Lung Health Group (LHG). Site demographics and surfactant therapy procedural details were categorically collected. Free text and multiple-choice questions were utilized to capture perceived barriers and individual preferences for MIST use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight of 33 participating members of the CNN EPIQ-LHG completed the survey between April 2021 and October 2021 (85%); 17/28 (61%) respondents reported ongoing MIST utilization at their center. Most centers that used MIST techniques administered bovine lipid extract surfactant (68%), commonly using angiocatheters (47%) and purpose-built catheters (41%). MIST was widely used for patients at 26-33 weeks gestational age (88%). Nine centres had never used MIST (32%), and 3 indicated a plan to implement MIST within the next 2 years. Common barriers to MIST use included lack of consensus amongst clinicians (78%), lack of training (56%), and lack of experience with MIST (56%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While MIST is being increasingly used in Canadian NICUs, universal use is yet to be seen. Clinician inexperience and lack of consensus, formal training, and local guidelines contribute to underutilization of MIST. Training workshops, country-wide data collection, and uniform operating protocols are needed to standardize practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"122-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/57/00/cjrt-2022-011.PMC9333198.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2022-011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2022-011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:微创表面活化剂疗法(MIST)可用于治疗新生儿重症监护室(NICU)中的新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征。在全球范围内,微创表面活性剂的临床和机构使用情况一直存在差异,而有关加拿大微创表面活性剂使用情况的研究成果却鲜有发表。因此,本研究旨在调查加拿大新生儿重症监护室对 MIST 的使用情况:通过电子邮件向加拿大新生儿网络(CNN)肺部健康小组(LHG)的 33 个参与中心发送了在线调查问卷。收集了各中心的人口统计数据和表面活性治疗程序的详细信息。利用自由文本和多项选择题来了解使用 MIST 的感知障碍和个人偏好:CNN EPIQ-LHG 的 33 位参与成员中有 28 位在 2021 年 4 月至 2021 年 10 月期间完成了调查(85%);17/28(61%)位受访者称其中心正在使用 MIST。大多数使用 MIST 技术的中心使用牛脂质提取物表面活性剂(68%),通常使用血管导管(47%)和专用导管(41%)。妊娠 26-33 周的患者广泛使用 MIST(88%)。九家中心从未使用过 MIST(32%),三家中心表示计划在未来两年内使用 MIST。使用 MIST 的常见障碍包括临床医生之间缺乏共识(78%)、缺乏培训(56%)和缺乏 MIST 经验(56%):虽然加拿大新生儿重症监护室越来越多地使用 MIST,但尚未普及。临床医生缺乏经验、缺乏共识、正规培训和当地指南,这些都是导致 MIST 使用不足的原因。需要举办培训讲习班、在全国范围内收集数据并制定统一的操作规程,以规范操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A survey of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in Canada.

Introduction: Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) can be used to treat neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Clinical and institutional variances in MIST utilization persist globally with little published research regarding MIST utilization in Canada. Therefore, the objective of this study was to survey MIST utilization in NICUs in Canada.

Methods: An online survey was emailed to the 33 participating centres of Canadian Neonatal NetworkTM (CNN) Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality (EPIQ) Lung Health Group (LHG). Site demographics and surfactant therapy procedural details were categorically collected. Free text and multiple-choice questions were utilized to capture perceived barriers and individual preferences for MIST use.

Results: Twenty-eight of 33 participating members of the CNN EPIQ-LHG completed the survey between April 2021 and October 2021 (85%); 17/28 (61%) respondents reported ongoing MIST utilization at their center. Most centers that used MIST techniques administered bovine lipid extract surfactant (68%), commonly using angiocatheters (47%) and purpose-built catheters (41%). MIST was widely used for patients at 26-33 weeks gestational age (88%). Nine centres had never used MIST (32%), and 3 indicated a plan to implement MIST within the next 2 years. Common barriers to MIST use included lack of consensus amongst clinicians (78%), lack of training (56%), and lack of experience with MIST (56%).

Conclusion: While MIST is being increasingly used in Canadian NICUs, universal use is yet to be seen. Clinician inexperience and lack of consensus, formal training, and local guidelines contribute to underutilization of MIST. Training workshops, country-wide data collection, and uniform operating protocols are needed to standardize practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The CJRT is published four times a year and represents the interests of respiratory therapists nationally and internationally. The CJRT has been redesigned to act as an educational dissemination tool. The CJRT encourages submission of original articles, papers, commentaries, case studies, literature reviews and directed reading papers. Submissions can be sent to Rita Hansen.
期刊最新文献
Development of a guide for continuous positive airway pressure use - A good fit: Making continuous positive airway pressure work for you. Is CT pulmonary angiography overutilized in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism? A retrospective study. Highlighting the year's most transformative research as voted by the editorial board: Exploring knowledge gaps and research needs in respiratory therapy. Earning a Journal Impact Factor: Progress, recognition, and growth for the CJRT. CPAP vs HFNC in treatment of patients with COVID-19 ARDS: A retrospective propensity-matched study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1