学龄儿童不同书写任务的笔迹易读性。

Yael Fogel, Sara Rosenblum, Anna L Barnett
{"title":"学龄儿童不同书写任务的笔迹易读性。","authors":"Yael Fogel,&nbsp;Sara Rosenblum,&nbsp;Anna L Barnett","doi":"10.1177/15691861221075709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In school, children are required to perform a range of handwriting tasks. The writing needs to be legible to the child and other readers. The aim of this study was to examine handwriting legibility across different writing tasks and to explore which components might predict overall handwriting legibility. <b>Methods:</b> This was a secondary analysis of data from 148 school-aged children across writing scripts obtained from the Detailed Assessment of Speed of Handwriting: copying-best, copying-quickly and free-writing. <b>Results:</b> Results showed that letter formation was the major predictor of the total HLS score, and significant differences in handwriting legibility were found across the three tasks. <b>Conclusions:</b> The HLS is a practical tool that can benefit occupational therapists who work in schools by assessing handwriting legibility across different handwriting tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":73249,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT","volume":"35 1","pages":"44-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/9e/10.1177_15691861221075709.PMC9279878.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Handwriting legibility across different writing tasks in school-aged children.\",\"authors\":\"Yael Fogel,&nbsp;Sara Rosenblum,&nbsp;Anna L Barnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15691861221075709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In school, children are required to perform a range of handwriting tasks. The writing needs to be legible to the child and other readers. The aim of this study was to examine handwriting legibility across different writing tasks and to explore which components might predict overall handwriting legibility. <b>Methods:</b> This was a secondary analysis of data from 148 school-aged children across writing scripts obtained from the Detailed Assessment of Speed of Handwriting: copying-best, copying-quickly and free-writing. <b>Results:</b> Results showed that letter formation was the major predictor of the total HLS score, and significant differences in handwriting legibility were found across the three tasks. <b>Conclusions:</b> The HLS is a practical tool that can benefit occupational therapists who work in schools by assessing handwriting legibility across different handwriting tasks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"44-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/9e/10.1177_15691861221075709.PMC9279878.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15691861221075709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15691861221075709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:在学校里,孩子们被要求完成一系列的书写任务。字迹要清晰,孩子和其他读者都看得懂。本研究的目的是检查不同写作任务的笔迹易读性,并探索哪些成分可能预测整体笔迹易读性。方法:这是对148名学龄儿童的书写数据的二次分析,这些数据来自笔迹速度的详细评估:抄写-最好,抄写-快速和自由书写。结果:字母形成是HLS总分的主要预测因子,三个任务的字迹易读性存在显著差异。结论:HLS是一种实用的工具,可以帮助在学校工作的职业治疗师通过评估不同笔迹任务的笔迹易读性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Handwriting legibility across different writing tasks in school-aged children.

Background: In school, children are required to perform a range of handwriting tasks. The writing needs to be legible to the child and other readers. The aim of this study was to examine handwriting legibility across different writing tasks and to explore which components might predict overall handwriting legibility. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data from 148 school-aged children across writing scripts obtained from the Detailed Assessment of Speed of Handwriting: copying-best, copying-quickly and free-writing. Results: Results showed that letter formation was the major predictor of the total HLS score, and significant differences in handwriting legibility were found across the three tasks. Conclusions: The HLS is a practical tool that can benefit occupational therapists who work in schools by assessing handwriting legibility across different handwriting tasks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Re-designing the experience of transition into nursing homes: A Singapore study. Reliability and validity of five balance assessments battery in individuals with schizophrenia. Psychological and physiological benefits of horticultural therapy for Chinese older adults. Classification of life satisfaction by occupational gaps and its characteristics among older adults with care needs. Advancing readiness for change in substance use for people with substance use disorders using the Kawa model based intervention program: A quasi-experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1