COVID-19时代骨骼药物的利弊。

Elena Tsourdi, Matthew T Drake
{"title":"COVID-19时代骨骼药物的利弊。","authors":"Elena Tsourdi,&nbsp;Matthew T Drake","doi":"10.1007/s40674-022-00192-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review provides an overview regarding osteoporosis therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted treatments for osteoporosis and resulted in decreased adherence particularly for parenteral regimens. Osteoporosis medications are safe and effective during the pandemic and should be continued whenever possible. Bisphosphonates have long-lasting effects on bone turnover such that delays in their administration are unlikely to be harmful to skeletal health. In contrast, interruption of denosumab treatment is strongly discouraged because of rapid loss of bone mass and an associated increased risk for rebound vertebral fractures. When osteoanabolic treatments cannot be continued during the pandemic, change to an oral bisphosphonate is advised. Preclinical data suggest possible beneficial effects of some therapies against COVID-19, but require validation in clinical studies. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a more severe COVID-19 clinical course but data supporting improvements in outcomes with vitamin D supplementation are lacking.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on long-term bone health remains unknown but focused interventions to ensure osteoporosis treatment initiation/maintenance should be implemented. Future studies are needed to determine whether osteoporosis medications have an impact on SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and COVID-19 clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11096,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Rheumatology","volume":"8 3","pages":"56-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287705/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era.\",\"authors\":\"Elena Tsourdi,&nbsp;Matthew T Drake\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40674-022-00192-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review provides an overview regarding osteoporosis therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted treatments for osteoporosis and resulted in decreased adherence particularly for parenteral regimens. Osteoporosis medications are safe and effective during the pandemic and should be continued whenever possible. Bisphosphonates have long-lasting effects on bone turnover such that delays in their administration are unlikely to be harmful to skeletal health. In contrast, interruption of denosumab treatment is strongly discouraged because of rapid loss of bone mass and an associated increased risk for rebound vertebral fractures. When osteoanabolic treatments cannot be continued during the pandemic, change to an oral bisphosphonate is advised. Preclinical data suggest possible beneficial effects of some therapies against COVID-19, but require validation in clinical studies. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a more severe COVID-19 clinical course but data supporting improvements in outcomes with vitamin D supplementation are lacking.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on long-term bone health remains unknown but focused interventions to ensure osteoporosis treatment initiation/maintenance should be implemented. Future studies are needed to determine whether osteoporosis medications have an impact on SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and COVID-19 clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Treatment Options in Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"56-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287705/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Treatment Options in Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40674-022-00192-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40674-022-00192-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

综述目的:本综述综述了COVID-19大流行期间骨质疏松症的治疗方法。最新发现:2019冠状病毒病大流行扰乱了骨质疏松症的治疗,导致依从性下降,尤其是肠外治疗。治疗骨质疏松症的药物在大流行期间是安全有效的,应尽可能继续使用。双膦酸盐对骨转换具有持久的影响,因此延迟给药不太可能对骨骼健康有害。相反,强烈建议中断denosumab治疗,因为骨量的快速损失和相关的椎体反弹骨折风险增加。当大流行期间不能继续进行骨合成代谢治疗时,建议改为口服双膦酸盐。临床前数据表明,一些治疗方法可能对COVID-19有益,但需要在临床研究中进行验证。维生素D缺乏与更严重的COVID-19临床病程相关,但缺乏支持补充维生素D改善结果的数据。总结:COVID-19大流行对长期骨骼健康的影响尚不清楚,但应实施重点干预措施,以确保骨质疏松症治疗的开始/维持。骨质疏松药物是否对SARS-CoV-2病理生理和COVID-19临床结果有影响,还需要进一步的研究来确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era.

Purpose of review: This review provides an overview regarding osteoporosis therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Recent findings: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted treatments for osteoporosis and resulted in decreased adherence particularly for parenteral regimens. Osteoporosis medications are safe and effective during the pandemic and should be continued whenever possible. Bisphosphonates have long-lasting effects on bone turnover such that delays in their administration are unlikely to be harmful to skeletal health. In contrast, interruption of denosumab treatment is strongly discouraged because of rapid loss of bone mass and an associated increased risk for rebound vertebral fractures. When osteoanabolic treatments cannot be continued during the pandemic, change to an oral bisphosphonate is advised. Preclinical data suggest possible beneficial effects of some therapies against COVID-19, but require validation in clinical studies. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a more severe COVID-19 clinical course but data supporting improvements in outcomes with vitamin D supplementation are lacking.

Summary: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on long-term bone health remains unknown but focused interventions to ensure osteoporosis treatment initiation/maintenance should be implemented. Future studies are needed to determine whether osteoporosis medications have an impact on SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and COVID-19 clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
(Levamisole Adulterated) Cocaine-Induced Vasculitis: What Is Known/Current Evidence Vascular Interventions in Takayasu Arteritis Intravenous Immunoglobulins in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: Where Are We? Treatment of Myositis Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Systemic Sclerosis–Associated Interstitial Lung Disease and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: an Update
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1