通用粘合剂牙本质粘合力中不同粘合厚度的因果关系

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Adhesive Dentistry Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI:10.3290/j.jad.b3240695
Arefin Alam, Abu Faem Mohammad Almas Chowdhury, Monica Yamauti, Pipop Saikaew, Shuhei Hoshika, Ricardo Marins Carvalho, Hidehiko Sano, Sharanbir K Sidhu
{"title":"通用粘合剂牙本质粘合力中不同粘合厚度的因果关系","authors":"Arefin Alam, Abu Faem Mohammad Almas Chowdhury, Monica Yamauti, Pipop Saikaew, Shuhei Hoshika, Ricardo Marins Carvalho, Hidehiko Sano, Sharanbir K Sidhu","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b3240695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether varying thicknesses of universal adhesives utilizing the additional coating strategy would affect their microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin, hardness, and elastic modulus (mechanical properties).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety-nine human maxillary premolars were cut to expose coronal dentin, ground with regular-grit diamond burs, and randomly distributed into 9 groups based on 1. adhesive: Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SB; universal), G Premio Bond (GP; universal) and Clearfil Megabond 2 (MB; two-step self-etch; control); and 2. application strategy (one, two or three coats; each coat light cured). After adhesive application and resin composite buildup, the bonded teeth were stored in distilled water (37°C; 24 h). Resin-dentin sticks from eight premolars per group (each premolar yielded 3 sticks; n = 24 sticks altogether) were prepared for the µTBS test, followed by measurement of the adhesive thicknesses at their fractured ends using SEM. The mechanical properties of the adhesive layers produced by different coats were evaluated on separate resin-dentin slices (n = 3 teeth per group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two coats significantly increased the µTBS (p < 0.001) of all the adhesives. The correlation between adhesive thickness and bond strength was positive for GP but negative for SB. MB did not show any correlation. Additional coating significantly increased the mechanical properties of GP (p < 0.05) but did not affect SB and MB (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An additional adhesive coating over the manufacturers' recommendations improved the bond strength of all the adhesives tested. However, the increased mechanical properties of the adhesives with additional curing was material dependent.</p>","PeriodicalId":55604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cause-Effect Relationship of Varying Bonding Thicknesses in Dentin Adhesion of Universal Adhesives.\",\"authors\":\"Arefin Alam, Abu Faem Mohammad Almas Chowdhury, Monica Yamauti, Pipop Saikaew, Shuhei Hoshika, Ricardo Marins Carvalho, Hidehiko Sano, Sharanbir K Sidhu\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.jad.b3240695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether varying thicknesses of universal adhesives utilizing the additional coating strategy would affect their microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin, hardness, and elastic modulus (mechanical properties).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety-nine human maxillary premolars were cut to expose coronal dentin, ground with regular-grit diamond burs, and randomly distributed into 9 groups based on 1. adhesive: Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SB; universal), G Premio Bond (GP; universal) and Clearfil Megabond 2 (MB; two-step self-etch; control); and 2. application strategy (one, two or three coats; each coat light cured). After adhesive application and resin composite buildup, the bonded teeth were stored in distilled water (37°C; 24 h). Resin-dentin sticks from eight premolars per group (each premolar yielded 3 sticks; n = 24 sticks altogether) were prepared for the µTBS test, followed by measurement of the adhesive thicknesses at their fractured ends using SEM. The mechanical properties of the adhesive layers produced by different coats were evaluated on separate resin-dentin slices (n = 3 teeth per group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two coats significantly increased the µTBS (p < 0.001) of all the adhesives. The correlation between adhesive thickness and bond strength was positive for GP but negative for SB. MB did not show any correlation. Additional coating significantly increased the mechanical properties of GP (p < 0.05) but did not affect SB and MB (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An additional adhesive coating over the manufacturers' recommendations improved the bond strength of all the adhesives tested. However, the increased mechanical properties of the adhesives with additional curing was material dependent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b3240695\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b3240695","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估使用附加涂层策略的通用粘合剂的不同厚度是否会影响其与牙本质的微拉伸粘接强度(µTBS)、硬度和弹性模量(机械性能):对 99 颗人类上颌前臼齿进行切削以暴露冠状牙本质,用常规砂粒的金刚石车针进行研磨,并根据 1.粘合剂随机分为 9 组:Scotchbond 通用粘合剂 (SB;通用型)、G Premio 粘合剂 (GP;通用型) 和 Clearfil Megabond 2 (MB;两步自酸蚀;对照组);以及 2. 应用策略(一层、两层或三层;每层光固化)。粘合剂涂抹和树脂合成后,将粘合的牙齿保存在蒸馏水中(37°C;24 小时)。每组 8 颗前臼齿的树脂牙本质粘接棒(每颗前臼齿 3 根,共 24 根)准备用于 µTBS 测试,然后使用扫描电子显微镜测量其断裂端的粘接剂厚度。在单独的树脂-牙本质切片上评估了不同涂层所产生的粘合剂层的机械性能(每组 n = 3 颗牙齿):结果:所有粘合剂的µTBS(p < 0.001)都明显增加。粘合剂厚度和粘合强度之间的相关性对 GP 来说是正的,但对 SB 来说是负的。MB 没有显示出任何相关性。附加涂层明显提高了 GP 的机械性能(p < 0.05),但对 SB 和 MB 没有影响(p < 0.05):结论:在制造商建议的基础上增加粘合剂涂层可提高所有测试粘合剂的粘合强度。然而,额外固化后粘合剂机械性能的提高与材料有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cause-Effect Relationship of Varying Bonding Thicknesses in Dentin Adhesion of Universal Adhesives.

Purpose: To evaluate whether varying thicknesses of universal adhesives utilizing the additional coating strategy would affect their microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin, hardness, and elastic modulus (mechanical properties).

Materials and methods: Ninety-nine human maxillary premolars were cut to expose coronal dentin, ground with regular-grit diamond burs, and randomly distributed into 9 groups based on 1. adhesive: Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SB; universal), G Premio Bond (GP; universal) and Clearfil Megabond 2 (MB; two-step self-etch; control); and 2. application strategy (one, two or three coats; each coat light cured). After adhesive application and resin composite buildup, the bonded teeth were stored in distilled water (37°C; 24 h). Resin-dentin sticks from eight premolars per group (each premolar yielded 3 sticks; n = 24 sticks altogether) were prepared for the µTBS test, followed by measurement of the adhesive thicknesses at their fractured ends using SEM. The mechanical properties of the adhesive layers produced by different coats were evaluated on separate resin-dentin slices (n = 3 teeth per group).

Results: Two coats significantly increased the µTBS (p < 0.001) of all the adhesives. The correlation between adhesive thickness and bond strength was positive for GP but negative for SB. MB did not show any correlation. Additional coating significantly increased the mechanical properties of GP (p < 0.05) but did not affect SB and MB (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: An additional adhesive coating over the manufacturers' recommendations improved the bond strength of all the adhesives tested. However, the increased mechanical properties of the adhesives with additional curing was material dependent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: New materials and applications for adhesion are profoundly changing the way dentistry is delivered. Bonding techniques, which have long been restricted to the tooth hard tissues, enamel, and dentin, have obvious applications in operative and preventive dentistry, as well as in esthetic and pediatric dentistry, prosthodontics, and orthodontics. The current development of adhesive techniques for soft tissues and slow-releasing agents will expand applications to include periodontics and oral surgery. Scientifically sound, peer-reviewed articles explore the latest innovations in these emerging fields.
期刊最新文献
Preheated Composite as an Alternative for Bonding Feldspathic and Hybrid Ceramics: A Microshear Bond Strength Study. Fourteen-year Clinical Performance of a HEMA-free One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Non-carious Cervical Lesions. Three-year Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions. Effects of Surface Treatment and Thermocycling on the Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic. Effect of Carbodiimide (EDC) on the Bond Strength Longevity of Epoxy Resin-based Endodontic Sealer to Root Dentin: An In-Vitro Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1