c反应蛋白和白细胞计数在巨细胞动脉炎患者FDG PET/CT诊断中的临床应用[18F]。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Nuklearmedizin-nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-17 DOI:10.1055/a-1830-7767
Konstanze V Guggenberger, Marius L Vogt, Steven P Rowe, Takahiro Higuchi, Marc Schmalzing, Hans-Peter Tony, Andreas K Buck, Thorsten A Bley, Matthias Fröhlich, Rudolf A Werner
{"title":"c反应蛋白和白细胞计数在巨细胞动脉炎患者FDG PET/CT诊断中的临床应用[18F]。","authors":"Konstanze V Guggenberger,&nbsp;Marius L Vogt,&nbsp;Steven P Rowe,&nbsp;Takahiro Higuchi,&nbsp;Marc Schmalzing,&nbsp;Hans-Peter Tony,&nbsp;Andreas K Buck,&nbsp;Thorsten A Bley,&nbsp;Matthias Fröhlich,&nbsp;Rudolf A Werner","doi":"10.1055/a-1830-7767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>2-deoxy-2-[<sup>18</sup>F]fluoro-D-glucose ([<sup>18</sup>F]FDG) PET/CT can be utilized in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), but pretest probability of established laboratory marker such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) has not been defined yet. We aimed to elucidate the clinical utility of CRP and WBC for scheduling an [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG scan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>18 treatment-naïve GCA patients and 14 GCA subjects with anti-inflammatory treatment (glucocorticoids or comparable drugs), who underwent [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT and who had no other inflammatory disease at time of scan, were identified. A semi-quantitative analysis in 11 vessel segments was conducted, with averaged jugular vein, healthy liver and lung tissue (Target-to-background ratio [TBR]<sub>VJ/liver/lung</sub>) serving as background. Derived TBR were then correlated with CRP and WBC at time of PET using Spearman's correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all treatment-naïve patients, TBR<sub>VJ</sub> was 2.3±1.1 (95%CI, 2.2-2.5), TBR<sub>liver</sub> was 1.0±0.5 (95%CI, 0.9-1.0) and average TBR<sub>lung</sub> was 6.3±3.6 (95%CI, 5.8-6.8). No significant correlation was noted for either CRP (TBR<sub>VJ</sub>: R=-0.19; TBR<sub>liver</sub>: R=-0.03; TBR<sub>lung</sub>: R=-0.17; each P ≥ 0.44) or for WBC (TBR<sub>VJ</sub>: R=-0.40; TBR<sub>liver</sub>: R=-0.32; TBR<sub>lung</sub>: R=-0.37; each P ≥ 0.10). Similar results were recorded for patients under treatment at time of PET. Again, no significant correlation was reached for either CRP (TBR<sub>VJ</sub>: R=-0.17; TBR<sub>liver</sub>: R=-0.28; TBR<sub>lung</sub>: R=-0.09; each P ≥ 0.32) or WBC (TBR<sub>VJ</sub>: R=-0.06; TBR<sub>liver</sub>: R=-0.13; TBR<sub>lung</sub>: R=0.06; each P ≥ 0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In GCA patients with and without anti-inflammatory treatment, CRP and WBC did not substantially correlate with TBR at time of scan. Given the rather limited pretest probability of those parameters, such laboratory values may have less diagnostic utility to order an [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":19238,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin-nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Utility of C-Reactive Protein and White Blood Cell Count for Scheduling an [18F]FDG PET/CT in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis.\",\"authors\":\"Konstanze V Guggenberger,&nbsp;Marius L Vogt,&nbsp;Steven P Rowe,&nbsp;Takahiro Higuchi,&nbsp;Marc Schmalzing,&nbsp;Hans-Peter Tony,&nbsp;Andreas K Buck,&nbsp;Thorsten A Bley,&nbsp;Matthias Fröhlich,&nbsp;Rudolf A Werner\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-1830-7767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>2-deoxy-2-[<sup>18</sup>F]fluoro-D-glucose ([<sup>18</sup>F]FDG) PET/CT can be utilized in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), but pretest probability of established laboratory marker such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) has not been defined yet. We aimed to elucidate the clinical utility of CRP and WBC for scheduling an [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG scan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>18 treatment-naïve GCA patients and 14 GCA subjects with anti-inflammatory treatment (glucocorticoids or comparable drugs), who underwent [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT and who had no other inflammatory disease at time of scan, were identified. A semi-quantitative analysis in 11 vessel segments was conducted, with averaged jugular vein, healthy liver and lung tissue (Target-to-background ratio [TBR]<sub>VJ/liver/lung</sub>) serving as background. Derived TBR were then correlated with CRP and WBC at time of PET using Spearman's correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all treatment-naïve patients, TBR<sub>VJ</sub> was 2.3±1.1 (95%CI, 2.2-2.5), TBR<sub>liver</sub> was 1.0±0.5 (95%CI, 0.9-1.0) and average TBR<sub>lung</sub> was 6.3±3.6 (95%CI, 5.8-6.8). No significant correlation was noted for either CRP (TBR<sub>VJ</sub>: R=-0.19; TBR<sub>liver</sub>: R=-0.03; TBR<sub>lung</sub>: R=-0.17; each P ≥ 0.44) or for WBC (TBR<sub>VJ</sub>: R=-0.40; TBR<sub>liver</sub>: R=-0.32; TBR<sub>lung</sub>: R=-0.37; each P ≥ 0.10). Similar results were recorded for patients under treatment at time of PET. Again, no significant correlation was reached for either CRP (TBR<sub>VJ</sub>: R=-0.17; TBR<sub>liver</sub>: R=-0.28; TBR<sub>lung</sub>: R=-0.09; each P ≥ 0.32) or WBC (TBR<sub>VJ</sub>: R=-0.06; TBR<sub>liver</sub>: R=-0.13; TBR<sub>lung</sub>: R=0.06; each P ≥ 0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In GCA patients with and without anti-inflammatory treatment, CRP and WBC did not substantially correlate with TBR at time of scan. Given the rather limited pretest probability of those parameters, such laboratory values may have less diagnostic utility to order an [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuklearmedizin-nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuklearmedizin-nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1830-7767\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin-nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1830-7767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:2-脱氧-2-[18F]氟-d -葡萄糖([18F]FDG) PET/CT可用于巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者,但尚未确定已建立的实验室标志物如c反应蛋白(CRP)和白细胞计数(WBC)的预测概率。我们的目的是阐明CRP和WBC在安排[18F]FDG扫描中的临床应用。方法:选取18例treatment-naïve GCA患者和14例接受抗炎治疗(糖皮质激素或类似药物)的GCA患者,均行[18F]FDG PET/CT扫描,扫描时无其他炎症性疾病。以平均颈静脉、健康肝脏和肺组织(目标与背景比[TBR]VJ/肝/肺)为背景,对11个血管段进行半定量分析。然后用Spearman相关法将所得TBR与PET时的CRP和WBC进行相关性分析。结果:在所有treatment-naïve患者中,TBRVJ为2.3±1.1 (95%CI, 2.2-2.5), TBRliver为1.0±0.5 (95%CI, 0.9-1.0), TBRlung平均为6.3±3.6 (95%CI, 5.8-6.8)。两组CRP均无显著相关性(TBRVJ: R=-0.19;TBRliver: R = -0.03;TBRlung: R = -0.17;每个P≥0.44)或WBC (TBRVJ: R=-0.40;TBRliver: R = -0.32;TBRlung: R = -0.37;P均≥0.10)。同样的结果也被记录在PET时接受治疗的患者身上。同样,CRP (TBRVJ: R=-0.17;TBRliver: R = -0.28;TBRlung: R = -0.09;P均≥0.32)或WBC (TBRVJ: R=-0.06;TBRliver: R = -0.13;TBRlung: R = 0.06;P均≥0.65)。结论:在接受和未接受抗炎治疗的GCA患者中,扫描时CRP和WBC与TBR无显著相关性。考虑到这些参数的预测概率相当有限,这些实验室值可能对订购FDG PET/CT的诊断效用较小[18F]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Utility of C-Reactive Protein and White Blood Cell Count for Scheduling an [18F]FDG PET/CT in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis.

Objectives: 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) PET/CT can be utilized in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), but pretest probability of established laboratory marker such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) has not been defined yet. We aimed to elucidate the clinical utility of CRP and WBC for scheduling an [18F]FDG scan.

Methods: 18 treatment-naïve GCA patients and 14 GCA subjects with anti-inflammatory treatment (glucocorticoids or comparable drugs), who underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT and who had no other inflammatory disease at time of scan, were identified. A semi-quantitative analysis in 11 vessel segments was conducted, with averaged jugular vein, healthy liver and lung tissue (Target-to-background ratio [TBR]VJ/liver/lung) serving as background. Derived TBR were then correlated with CRP and WBC at time of PET using Spearman's correlation.

Results: For all treatment-naïve patients, TBRVJ was 2.3±1.1 (95%CI, 2.2-2.5), TBRliver was 1.0±0.5 (95%CI, 0.9-1.0) and average TBRlung was 6.3±3.6 (95%CI, 5.8-6.8). No significant correlation was noted for either CRP (TBRVJ: R=-0.19; TBRliver: R=-0.03; TBRlung: R=-0.17; each P ≥ 0.44) or for WBC (TBRVJ: R=-0.40; TBRliver: R=-0.32; TBRlung: R=-0.37; each P ≥ 0.10). Similar results were recorded for patients under treatment at time of PET. Again, no significant correlation was reached for either CRP (TBRVJ: R=-0.17; TBRliver: R=-0.28; TBRlung: R=-0.09; each P ≥ 0.32) or WBC (TBRVJ: R=-0.06; TBRliver: R=-0.13; TBRlung: R=0.06; each P ≥ 0.65).

Conclusions: In GCA patients with and without anti-inflammatory treatment, CRP and WBC did not substantially correlate with TBR at time of scan. Given the rather limited pretest probability of those parameters, such laboratory values may have less diagnostic utility to order an [18F]FDG PET/CT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
267
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Als Standes- und Fachorgan (Organ von Deutscher Gesellschaft für Nuklearmedizin (DGN), Österreichischer Gesellschaft für Nuklearmedizin und Molekulare Bildgebung (ÖGN), Schweizerischer Gesellschaft für Nuklearmedizin (SGNM, SSNM)) von hohem wissenschaftlichen Anspruch befasst sich die CME-zertifizierte Nuklearmedizin/ NuclearMedicine mit Diagnostik und Therapie in der Nuklearmedizin und dem Strahlenschutz: Originalien, Übersichtsarbeiten, Referate und Kongressberichte stellen aktuelle Themen der Diagnose und Therapie dar. Ausführliche Berichte aus den DGN-Arbeitskreisen, Nachrichten aus Forschung und Industrie sowie Beschreibungen innovativer technischer Geräte, Einrichtungen und Systeme runden das Konzept ab. Die Abstracts der Jahrestagungen dreier europäischer Fachgesellschaften sind Bestandteil der Kongressausgaben. Nuklearmedizin erscheint regelmäßig mit sechs Ausgaben pro Jahr und richtet sich vor allem an Nuklearmediziner, Radiologen, Strahlentherapeuten, Medizinphysiker und Radiopharmazeuten.
期刊最新文献
The Medical Informatics Initiative and the Network University Medicine - Perspectives for Nuclear Medicine. Combined morphologic-metabolic biomarkers from [18F]FDG-PET/CT stratify prognostic groups in low-risk NSCLC. NuklearMedizin 2024: Abstract-Einreichung bis zum 1. November geöffnet! DGN-Forschungs- und -Förderpreise Preisverleihungen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1