儿科牙科住院医师项目中程序性镇静和全身麻醉的程序、时间和费用比较。

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN Pub Date : 2022-05-15
Hazha Ibrahim, Travis Nelson, Sarat Thikkurissy, Zheng Xu, JoAnna Scott
{"title":"儿科牙科住院医师项目中程序性镇静和全身麻醉的程序、时间和费用比较。","authors":"Hazha Ibrahim,&nbsp;Travis Nelson,&nbsp;Sarat Thikkurissy,&nbsp;Zheng Xu,&nbsp;JoAnna Scott","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare dental procedures, time, success rates and fees associated with pediatric dental treatment using oral moderate sedation (SED) and general anesthesia (GA) in a pediatric dentistry residency program. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective chart review included a convenience sample of 50 patients between 2016 and 2017 who received SED and 50 patients who received GA for dental treatment. Healthy 24- to 71-month old Medicaid-insured patients who received restorative dental treatment were included. Treatment time and procedure codes were abstracted from the dental record. Fees were calculated based upon the pharmacologic modality utilized to complete each patient's treatment plan. <b>Results:</b> On average, GA patients were younger (<i>P</i> <0.001) and received a greater number (12.8 versus 5.6; <i>P</i> <0.001) and complexity of dental procedures than those in the SED group ( <i>P</i> <0.001). Pharmacologic fees associated with GA were higher ($653 for GA, $137 for SED, <i>P</i> <0.001). The overall SED success rate was 66 percent and significantly differed by the number of visits required, with the highest success rate (74 percent) at the second visit (<i>P</i> =0.011). <b>Conclusions:</b> Procedures performed, time, success rates and associated fees differed significantly between SED and GA. These characteristics should be considered when planning treatment for pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51605,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Procedures, Time and Fees Associated with Procedural Sedation and General Anesthesia in a Pediatric Dentistry Residency Program.\",\"authors\":\"Hazha Ibrahim,&nbsp;Travis Nelson,&nbsp;Sarat Thikkurissy,&nbsp;Zheng Xu,&nbsp;JoAnna Scott\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare dental procedures, time, success rates and fees associated with pediatric dental treatment using oral moderate sedation (SED) and general anesthesia (GA) in a pediatric dentistry residency program. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective chart review included a convenience sample of 50 patients between 2016 and 2017 who received SED and 50 patients who received GA for dental treatment. Healthy 24- to 71-month old Medicaid-insured patients who received restorative dental treatment were included. Treatment time and procedure codes were abstracted from the dental record. Fees were calculated based upon the pharmacologic modality utilized to complete each patient's treatment plan. <b>Results:</b> On average, GA patients were younger (<i>P</i> <0.001) and received a greater number (12.8 versus 5.6; <i>P</i> <0.001) and complexity of dental procedures than those in the SED group ( <i>P</i> <0.001). Pharmacologic fees associated with GA were higher ($653 for GA, $137 for SED, <i>P</i> <0.001). The overall SED success rate was 66 percent and significantly differed by the number of visits required, with the highest success rate (74 percent) at the second visit (<i>P</i> =0.011). <b>Conclusions:</b> Procedures performed, time, success rates and associated fees differed significantly between SED and GA. These characteristics should be considered when planning treatment for pediatric patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较儿科牙科住院医师项目中使用口服中度镇静(SED)和全身麻醉(GA)的牙科治疗程序、时间、成功率和费用。方法:本回顾性图表回顾纳入了2016年至2017年期间接受SED和50例接受GA牙科治疗的患者的方便样本。健康的24至71个月的医疗补助保险患者接受牙齿修复治疗。从牙科记录中提取治疗时间和程序代码。费用是根据完成每位患者治疗计划的药物方式来计算的。结果:GA患者平均年龄较轻(P P P P P =0.011)。结论:SED和GA的手术、时间、成功率和相关费用有显著差异。在规划儿科患者的治疗时应考虑这些特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Procedures, Time and Fees Associated with Procedural Sedation and General Anesthesia in a Pediatric Dentistry Residency Program.

Purpose: To compare dental procedures, time, success rates and fees associated with pediatric dental treatment using oral moderate sedation (SED) and general anesthesia (GA) in a pediatric dentistry residency program. Methods: This retrospective chart review included a convenience sample of 50 patients between 2016 and 2017 who received SED and 50 patients who received GA for dental treatment. Healthy 24- to 71-month old Medicaid-insured patients who received restorative dental treatment were included. Treatment time and procedure codes were abstracted from the dental record. Fees were calculated based upon the pharmacologic modality utilized to complete each patient's treatment plan. Results: On average, GA patients were younger (P <0.001) and received a greater number (12.8 versus 5.6; P <0.001) and complexity of dental procedures than those in the SED group ( P <0.001). Pharmacologic fees associated with GA were higher ($653 for GA, $137 for SED, P <0.001). The overall SED success rate was 66 percent and significantly differed by the number of visits required, with the highest success rate (74 percent) at the second visit (P =0.011). Conclusions: Procedures performed, time, success rates and associated fees differed significantly between SED and GA. These characteristics should be considered when planning treatment for pediatric patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Acquired after the merger between the American Society of Dentistry for Children and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry in 2002, the Journal of Dentistry for Children (JDC) is an internationally renowned journal whose publishing dates back to 1934. Published three times a year, JDC promotes the practice, education and research specifically related to the specialty of pediatric dentistry. It covers a wide range of topics related to the clinical care of children, from clinical techniques of daily importance to the practitioner, to studies on child behavior and growth and development. JDC also provides information on the physical, psychological and emotional conditions of children as they relate to and affect their dental health.
期刊最新文献
Acceptance of Behavior Guidance Techniques in Pediatric Dentistry Between American and Colombian Parents. Angioleiomyomatous Hamartoma of Incisive Papilla in an Adolescent. Caregivers' Perceptions of Dental Therapists. Clinical Implications of Temporomandibular Condyle Agenesis in a Toddler. COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Behavioral and Attitudinal Changes in Caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1