评估和比较牙周皮瓣手术的显微外科方法和传统方法的疗效:随机对照试验

IF 2.7 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental and Medical Problems Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17219/dmp/147183
Priyansha Rathore, Shiva Manjunath, Rika Singh
{"title":"评估和比较牙周皮瓣手术的显微外科方法和传统方法的疗效:随机对照试验","authors":"Priyansha Rathore, Shiva Manjunath, Rika Singh","doi":"10.17219/dmp/147183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of the magnification approach for the periodontal flap surgical procedure helps in better visualization and better handling of soft tissues, which results in early wound healing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to compare the conventional macroscopic approach for periodontal flap surgery with the microsurgically modified approach in a randomized controlled clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 60 subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A (test group), in which the subjects underwent the conventional open flap debridement procedure; and group B (control group), in which the subjects underwent open flap debridement with the use of a microsurgical loupe. The plaque index (PI), the gingival index (GI), the probing pocket depth (PPD), the clinical attachment level (CAL), and gingival recession (GR) were recorded at baseline, and at 3, 6 and 9 months postoperatively. Also, the early wound-healing index (EHI) was recorded at 10 days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the conventional and the microsurgical technique provided a statistically significant reduction in PI, GI and PPD as well as gain in CAL. However, the microsurgical technique demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in postoperative GR as well as reduced pain perception and EHI scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the microsurgical approach provides better clinical results with less discomfort, and thus makes the periodontal treatment more acceptable for the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating and comparing the efficacy of the microsurgical approach and the conventional approach for the periodontal flap surgical procedure: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Priyansha Rathore, Shiva Manjunath, Rika Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/dmp/147183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of the magnification approach for the periodontal flap surgical procedure helps in better visualization and better handling of soft tissues, which results in early wound healing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to compare the conventional macroscopic approach for periodontal flap surgery with the microsurgically modified approach in a randomized controlled clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 60 subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A (test group), in which the subjects underwent the conventional open flap debridement procedure; and group B (control group), in which the subjects underwent open flap debridement with the use of a microsurgical loupe. The plaque index (PI), the gingival index (GI), the probing pocket depth (PPD), the clinical attachment level (CAL), and gingival recession (GR) were recorded at baseline, and at 3, 6 and 9 months postoperatively. Also, the early wound-healing index (EHI) was recorded at 10 days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the conventional and the microsurgical technique provided a statistically significant reduction in PI, GI and PPD as well as gain in CAL. However, the microsurgical technique demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in postoperative GR as well as reduced pain perception and EHI scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the microsurgical approach provides better clinical results with less discomfort, and thus makes the periodontal treatment more acceptable for the patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/147183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/147183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用放大法进行牙周翻瓣手术有助于更好地观察和处理软组织,从而使伤口早日愈合:本研究旨在通过随机对照临床试验,比较牙周皮瓣手术的传统宏观方法与显微外科改良方法:将 60 名受试者随机分为两组:A 组(试验组),受试者接受传统的开放式翻瓣清创术;B 组(对照组),受试者接受使用显微手术放大镜的开放式翻瓣清创术。在基线、术后 3 个月、6 个月和 9 个月时记录牙菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、探诊袋深度(PPD)、临床附着水平(CAL)和牙龈退缩(GR)。此外,还记录了术后 10 天的早期伤口愈合指数(EHI):结果:传统技术和显微外科技术都在统计学上显著降低了 PI、GI 和 PPD,并提高了 CAL。然而,显微外科技术的术后 GR 值明显降低,疼痛感和 EHI 评分也有所降低:结论:使用显微外科方法可以获得更好的临床效果,同时减少不适感,从而使患者更容易接受牙周治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating and comparing the efficacy of the microsurgical approach and the conventional approach for the periodontal flap surgical procedure: A randomized controlled trial.

Background: The use of the magnification approach for the periodontal flap surgical procedure helps in better visualization and better handling of soft tissues, which results in early wound healing.

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare the conventional macroscopic approach for periodontal flap surgery with the microsurgically modified approach in a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Material and methods: A total of 60 subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A (test group), in which the subjects underwent the conventional open flap debridement procedure; and group B (control group), in which the subjects underwent open flap debridement with the use of a microsurgical loupe. The plaque index (PI), the gingival index (GI), the probing pocket depth (PPD), the clinical attachment level (CAL), and gingival recession (GR) were recorded at baseline, and at 3, 6 and 9 months postoperatively. Also, the early wound-healing index (EHI) was recorded at 10 days postoperatively.

Results: Both the conventional and the microsurgical technique provided a statistically significant reduction in PI, GI and PPD as well as gain in CAL. However, the microsurgical technique demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in postoperative GR as well as reduced pain perception and EHI scores.

Conclusions: The use of the microsurgical approach provides better clinical results with less discomfort, and thus makes the periodontal treatment more acceptable for the patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Most common congenital syndromes with facial asymmetry: A narrative review. Self-assessment skills of undergraduate students in operative dentistry: Preclinical performance and gender. Optical properties of advanced lithium disilicate. Studies on the content of toxic metals in teeth: A narrative review of literature. Kinesio Taping as an alternative therapy for limited mandibular mobility with pain in female patients with temporomandibular disorders: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1