Kathleen M Paulsen, Brendon P McDermott, Aaron J Myers, Michelle Gray, Wen-Juo Lo, Matthew S Ganio
{"title":"30-15间歇场地测试的信度和效度。","authors":"Kathleen M Paulsen, Brendon P McDermott, Aaron J Myers, Michelle Gray, Wen-Juo Lo, Matthew S Ganio","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2022.2098230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the 30-15 Intermittent Field Test (30-15<sub>IFT</sub>) with and without a ball. <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-four collegiate female soccer players (19.46 ± 1.22 years; 167.01 ± 7.23 cm; 60.95 ± 7.84 kg) performed 1 trial of the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery (YYIR) test, 3 trials of the 30-15<sub>IFT</sub>, and 3 trials of the 30-15<sub>IFT</sub> with a ball (30-15<sub>IFT-B</sub>), separated by a minimum 48 hours. Maximal intermittent running velocity (V<sub>IFT</sub>), heart rate at exhaustion (HR<sub>peak</sub>), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were collected. <b>Results</b>: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between trials demonstrated good reliability during the 30-15<sub>IFT</sub> in V<sub>IFT</sub> (ICC = 0.88) and HR<sub>peak</sub> (ICC = 0.89), in addition to the 30-15<sub>IFT-B</sub> V<sub>IFT</sub> (ICC = 0.83) and HR<sub>peak</sub> (ICC = 0.87). V<sub>IFT</sub> was significantly reduced in 30-15<sub>IFT-B</sub> (15.82 km h<sup>-1</sup>) compared to 30-15<sub>IFT</sub> (17.52 km h<sup>-1</sup>; <i>p</i> < .001), regardless of trial. HR and RPE were significantly greater in 30-15<sub>IFT</sub> compared to 30-15<sub>IFT-B</sub> (<i>p</i> < .05). Estimated maximal oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>max) YYIR and estimated VO<sub>2</sub>max of 30-15<sub>IFT</sub> and 30-15<sub>IFT-B</sub> was very strongly (<i>r</i> = 0.82) and strongly (<i>r</i> = 0.68) correlated. <b>Conclusion</b>: The 30-15<sub>IFT</sub> is considered valid and reliable and the 30-15<sub>IFT-B</sub> was reliable in female soccer players.</p>","PeriodicalId":54491,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and Validity of the 30-15 Intermittent Field Test With and Without a Soccer Ball.\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen M Paulsen, Brendon P McDermott, Aaron J Myers, Michelle Gray, Wen-Juo Lo, Matthew S Ganio\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701367.2022.2098230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the 30-15 Intermittent Field Test (30-15<sub>IFT</sub>) with and without a ball. <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-four collegiate female soccer players (19.46 ± 1.22 years; 167.01 ± 7.23 cm; 60.95 ± 7.84 kg) performed 1 trial of the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery (YYIR) test, 3 trials of the 30-15<sub>IFT</sub>, and 3 trials of the 30-15<sub>IFT</sub> with a ball (30-15<sub>IFT-B</sub>), separated by a minimum 48 hours. Maximal intermittent running velocity (V<sub>IFT</sub>), heart rate at exhaustion (HR<sub>peak</sub>), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were collected. <b>Results</b>: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between trials demonstrated good reliability during the 30-15<sub>IFT</sub> in V<sub>IFT</sub> (ICC = 0.88) and HR<sub>peak</sub> (ICC = 0.89), in addition to the 30-15<sub>IFT-B</sub> V<sub>IFT</sub> (ICC = 0.83) and HR<sub>peak</sub> (ICC = 0.87). V<sub>IFT</sub> was significantly reduced in 30-15<sub>IFT-B</sub> (15.82 km h<sup>-1</sup>) compared to 30-15<sub>IFT</sub> (17.52 km h<sup>-1</sup>; <i>p</i> < .001), regardless of trial. HR and RPE were significantly greater in 30-15<sub>IFT</sub> compared to 30-15<sub>IFT-B</sub> (<i>p</i> < .05). Estimated maximal oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>max) YYIR and estimated VO<sub>2</sub>max of 30-15<sub>IFT</sub> and 30-15<sub>IFT-B</sub> was very strongly (<i>r</i> = 0.82) and strongly (<i>r</i> = 0.68) correlated. <b>Conclusion</b>: The 30-15<sub>IFT</sub> is considered valid and reliable and the 30-15<sub>IFT-B</sub> was reliable in female soccer players.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2098230\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2098230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是检验30-15间歇场测试(30-15IFT)的信度和效度，有无球。方法:24名女大学生足球运动员(19.46±1.22岁;167.01±7.23 cm;(60.95±7.84 kg)进行1次溜溜球间歇恢复(YYIR)试验，3次30-15IFT试验，3次30-15IFT带球试验(30-15IFT- b)，间隔至少48小时。收集最大间歇跑步速度(VIFT)、衰竭心率(HRpeak)和感知运动评分(RPE)。结果:除了30-15IFT- b VIFT (ICC = 0.83)和HRpeak (ICC = 0.87)外，试验间的类内相关系数(ICC)在30-15IFT期间的VIFT (ICC = 0.88)和HRpeak (ICC = 0.89)中表现出良好的可靠性。与30-15IFT (17.52 km h-1)相比，30-15IFT- b (15.82 km h-1)显著降低了VIFT;P < 0.001)，与试验无关。30-15IFT组HR和RPE显著高于30-15IFT- b组(p < 0.05)。估计的最大耗氧量(VO2max) YYIR与30-15IFT和30-15IFT- b的估计VO2max非常强(r = 0.82)和强(r = 0.68)相关。结论:30-15IFT量表在女足运动员中是有效可靠的，30-15IFT- b量表是可靠的。
Reliability and Validity of the 30-15 Intermittent Field Test With and Without a Soccer Ball.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the 30-15 Intermittent Field Test (30-15IFT) with and without a ball. Methods: Twenty-four collegiate female soccer players (19.46 ± 1.22 years; 167.01 ± 7.23 cm; 60.95 ± 7.84 kg) performed 1 trial of the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery (YYIR) test, 3 trials of the 30-15IFT, and 3 trials of the 30-15IFT with a ball (30-15IFT-B), separated by a minimum 48 hours. Maximal intermittent running velocity (VIFT), heart rate at exhaustion (HRpeak), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were collected. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between trials demonstrated good reliability during the 30-15IFT in VIFT (ICC = 0.88) and HRpeak (ICC = 0.89), in addition to the 30-15IFT-B VIFT (ICC = 0.83) and HRpeak (ICC = 0.87). VIFT was significantly reduced in 30-15IFT-B (15.82 km h-1) compared to 30-15IFT (17.52 km h-1; p < .001), regardless of trial. HR and RPE were significantly greater in 30-15IFT compared to 30-15IFT-B (p < .05). Estimated maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) YYIR and estimated VO2max of 30-15IFT and 30-15IFT-B was very strongly (r = 0.82) and strongly (r = 0.68) correlated. Conclusion: The 30-15IFT is considered valid and reliable and the 30-15IFT-B was reliable in female soccer players.
期刊介绍：
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport publishes research in the art and science of human movement that contributes significantly to the knowledge base of the field as new information, reviews, substantiation or contradiction of previous findings, development of theory, or as application of new or improved techniques. The goals of RQES are to provide a scholarly outlet for knowledge that: (a) contributes to the study of human movement, particularly its cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary nature; (b) impacts theory and practice regarding human movement; (c) stimulates research about human movement; and (d) provides theoretical reviews and tutorials related to the study of human movement. The editorial board, associate editors, and external reviewers assist the editor-in-chief. Qualified reviewers in the appropriate subdisciplines review manuscripts deemed suitable. Authors are usually advised of the decision on their papers within 75–90 days.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
