Oscar Javier Mamani-Benito, Edwuin Javier Sucapuca Quispe, Luzby Yapu Jallo, Renzo Felipe Carranza Esteban, Josué Edison Turpo Chaparro, Susana K Lingan
{"title":"秘鲁小学教师远程工作感知量表(Tele-Cov-19)的设计与验证","authors":"Oscar Javier Mamani-Benito, Edwuin Javier Sucapuca Quispe, Luzby Yapu Jallo, Renzo Felipe Carranza Esteban, Josué Edison Turpo Chaparro, Susana K Lingan","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2022.25.03.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To design and validate a scale of perception of teleworking in Peruvian primary schoolteachers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of 400 primary schoolteachers (61.5% women) between 21 and 61 years of age, from six cities in Peru. Eight items were proposed, corresponding to indicators of training, safety, and flexibility of schedules, derived from the scientific literature. The scale was validated by seven experts who evaluated the relevance, representativeness and clarity of the items. Subsequently, we applied exploratory f (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), using the FACTOR Analysis program and SPSS AMOS version 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Aiken V indicators were statistically significant for the eight items. Before running the AFE, we calculated the KMO coefficient (0.93) and Bartlett's test (1832.9; gl = 28; p = 0.00). A single factor explained 62.27% of the total variance of the scale and its factor loadings ranged from 0.65 to 0.84. The CFA corroborated the internal structure of the scale (?2 = 58.24, df = 20, p < 0.01; RMR = 0.03; TLI = 0.97; CFI = 0.97; and RMSEA = 0.06) and the reliability was acceptable (? = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.89 - 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scale demonstrates evidence of content-based validity, internal structure and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":38326,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","volume":" ","pages":"259-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Design and validation of the telework perception scale (Tele-Cov-19) in Peruvian primary schoolteachers].\",\"authors\":\"Oscar Javier Mamani-Benito, Edwuin Javier Sucapuca Quispe, Luzby Yapu Jallo, Renzo Felipe Carranza Esteban, Josué Edison Turpo Chaparro, Susana K Lingan\",\"doi\":\"10.12961/aprl.2022.25.03.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To design and validate a scale of perception of teleworking in Peruvian primary schoolteachers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of 400 primary schoolteachers (61.5% women) between 21 and 61 years of age, from six cities in Peru. Eight items were proposed, corresponding to indicators of training, safety, and flexibility of schedules, derived from the scientific literature. The scale was validated by seven experts who evaluated the relevance, representativeness and clarity of the items. Subsequently, we applied exploratory f (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), using the FACTOR Analysis program and SPSS AMOS version 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Aiken V indicators were statistically significant for the eight items. Before running the AFE, we calculated the KMO coefficient (0.93) and Bartlett's test (1832.9; gl = 28; p = 0.00). A single factor explained 62.27% of the total variance of the scale and its factor loadings ranged from 0.65 to 0.84. The CFA corroborated the internal structure of the scale (?2 = 58.24, df = 20, p < 0.01; RMR = 0.03; TLI = 0.97; CFI = 0.97; and RMSEA = 0.06) and the reliability was acceptable (? = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.89 - 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scale demonstrates evidence of content-based validity, internal structure and reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"259-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2022.25.03.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2022.25.03.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Design and validation of the telework perception scale (Tele-Cov-19) in Peruvian primary schoolteachers].
Introduction: To design and validate a scale of perception of teleworking in Peruvian primary schoolteachers.
Method: This was a cross-sectional study of 400 primary schoolteachers (61.5% women) between 21 and 61 years of age, from six cities in Peru. Eight items were proposed, corresponding to indicators of training, safety, and flexibility of schedules, derived from the scientific literature. The scale was validated by seven experts who evaluated the relevance, representativeness and clarity of the items. Subsequently, we applied exploratory f (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), using the FACTOR Analysis program and SPSS AMOS version 21.
Results: The Aiken V indicators were statistically significant for the eight items. Before running the AFE, we calculated the KMO coefficient (0.93) and Bartlett's test (1832.9; gl = 28; p = 0.00). A single factor explained 62.27% of the total variance of the scale and its factor loadings ranged from 0.65 to 0.84. The CFA corroborated the internal structure of the scale (?2 = 58.24, df = 20, p < 0.01; RMR = 0.03; TLI = 0.97; CFI = 0.97; and RMSEA = 0.06) and the reliability was acceptable (? = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.89 - 0.92).
Conclusions: The scale demonstrates evidence of content-based validity, internal structure and reliability.