航空旅行中野生型严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的发病率:德国卫生当局追踪的46次航班结果,2020年1月至3月和6月至8月。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology Pub Date : 2022-10-22 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/8364666
Felix Moek, Anna Rohde, Meike Schöll, Juliane Seidel, Jonathan H J Baum, Maria An der Heiden
{"title":"航空旅行中野生型严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的发病率:德国卫生当局追踪的46次航班结果,2020年1月至3月和6月至8月。","authors":"Felix Moek,&nbsp;Anna Rohde,&nbsp;Meike Schöll,&nbsp;Juliane Seidel,&nbsp;Jonathan H J Baum,&nbsp;Maria An der Heiden","doi":"10.1155/2022/8364666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during air travel is scarce. We aimed to estimate the attack rate for wild-type SARS-CoV-2 to improve the evidence base for the adaptation of nonpharmaceutical intervention (NPI) strategies aboard airplanes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In collaboration with German Public Health Authorities (PHA), we conducted a follow-up of in-flight SARS-CoV-2 contact persons. We included those contact persons whom the Emergency Operations Centre at the Robert Koch-Institute had forwarded to PHA between January to March 2020 (before masking on flights became mandatory) and June to August 2020 (after the introduction of mandatory masking). We retrospectively collected data on whether these contact persons had been successfully contacted, had become symptomatic and had been tested for SARS-CoV-2, and whether alternative exposures other than the flight were known.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete data that allowed for the calculation of attack rates were available for 108 contact persons (median age of 36 (IQR 24-53), 40% female), traveling on 46 flights with a median flight duration of 3 hours (IQR 2-3.5). 62 of these persons travelled after masking on flights became mandatory. 13/87 developed symptoms, 44/77 were tested (no data for 21 and 31). 13 persons (9 of whom had been SARS-CoV-2 positive) were excluded from the analysis of attack rates due to a likely alternative exposure. We thus identified 4 probable in-flight transmissions (2 of which occurred after the introduction of mandatory masking). The overall attack rate resulted in 4.2% (4/95; 95% CI: 1.4%-11.0%). Considering flights after mandatory masking, the attack rate was 3.6% (2/56, 95% CI 0.6%-13.4%), before masking 5.1% (2/39, 95% CI 0.9%-18.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of wild-type SARS-CoV-2 transmission during air travel seemed low, but not negligible. In order to formulate an effective, evidence-based NPI protocol for air travel, further studies considering the different transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and vaccination status are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50715,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617719/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attack Rate for Wild-Type SARS-CoV-2 during Air Travel: Results from 46 Flights Traced by German Health Authorities, January-March and June-August 2020.\",\"authors\":\"Felix Moek,&nbsp;Anna Rohde,&nbsp;Meike Schöll,&nbsp;Juliane Seidel,&nbsp;Jonathan H J Baum,&nbsp;Maria An der Heiden\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/8364666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during air travel is scarce. We aimed to estimate the attack rate for wild-type SARS-CoV-2 to improve the evidence base for the adaptation of nonpharmaceutical intervention (NPI) strategies aboard airplanes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In collaboration with German Public Health Authorities (PHA), we conducted a follow-up of in-flight SARS-CoV-2 contact persons. We included those contact persons whom the Emergency Operations Centre at the Robert Koch-Institute had forwarded to PHA between January to March 2020 (before masking on flights became mandatory) and June to August 2020 (after the introduction of mandatory masking). We retrospectively collected data on whether these contact persons had been successfully contacted, had become symptomatic and had been tested for SARS-CoV-2, and whether alternative exposures other than the flight were known.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete data that allowed for the calculation of attack rates were available for 108 contact persons (median age of 36 (IQR 24-53), 40% female), traveling on 46 flights with a median flight duration of 3 hours (IQR 2-3.5). 62 of these persons travelled after masking on flights became mandatory. 13/87 developed symptoms, 44/77 were tested (no data for 21 and 31). 13 persons (9 of whom had been SARS-CoV-2 positive) were excluded from the analysis of attack rates due to a likely alternative exposure. We thus identified 4 probable in-flight transmissions (2 of which occurred after the introduction of mandatory masking). The overall attack rate resulted in 4.2% (4/95; 95% CI: 1.4%-11.0%). Considering flights after mandatory masking, the attack rate was 3.6% (2/56, 95% CI 0.6%-13.4%), before masking 5.1% (2/39, 95% CI 0.9%-18.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of wild-type SARS-CoV-2 transmission during air travel seemed low, but not negligible. In order to formulate an effective, evidence-based NPI protocol for air travel, further studies considering the different transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and vaccination status are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617719/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8364666\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8364666","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:关于严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型在航空旅行中传播风险的证据很少。我们旨在估计野生型严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的发病率,以改善飞机上非药物干预(NPI)策略适应的证据基础。方法:与德国公共卫生当局(PHA)合作,我们对飞行中的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型接触者进行了随访。我们包括罗伯特·科赫研究所紧急行动中心在2020年1月至3月(航班强制戴口罩之前)和2020年6月至8月(强制戴口罩之后)期间转交给PHA的联系人。我们回顾性地收集了有关这些接触者是否已成功接触、是否出现症状并接受了严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型检测的数据,以及是否已知除飞行之外的其他接触。结果:108名接触者(中位年龄36岁(IQR 24-53),40%为女性)乘坐46次航班,中位飞行时间为3 小时(IQR 2-3.5)。其中62人在航班上戴口罩后旅行。13/87人出现症状,44/77人接受了检测(没有21和31人的数据)。13人(其中9人为严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型阳性)因可能的替代暴露而被排除在发病率分析之外。因此,我们确定了4种可能的飞行中传输(其中2种发生在强制屏蔽之后)。总体发病率为4.2%(4/95;95%CI:1.4%-11.0%)。考虑到强制戴口罩后的航班,发病率为3.6%(2/56,95%CI0.6%-13.4%),戴口罩前为5.1%(2/39,95%CI0.9%-18.6%)。结论:航空旅行中野生型严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型传播的风险似乎很低,但不能忽略。为了制定一个有效的、基于证据的航空旅行NPI方案,需要进一步研究SARS-CoV-2变异毒株的不同传播性和疫苗接种状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attack Rate for Wild-Type SARS-CoV-2 during Air Travel: Results from 46 Flights Traced by German Health Authorities, January-March and June-August 2020.

Background: Evidence on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during air travel is scarce. We aimed to estimate the attack rate for wild-type SARS-CoV-2 to improve the evidence base for the adaptation of nonpharmaceutical intervention (NPI) strategies aboard airplanes.

Methods: In collaboration with German Public Health Authorities (PHA), we conducted a follow-up of in-flight SARS-CoV-2 contact persons. We included those contact persons whom the Emergency Operations Centre at the Robert Koch-Institute had forwarded to PHA between January to March 2020 (before masking on flights became mandatory) and June to August 2020 (after the introduction of mandatory masking). We retrospectively collected data on whether these contact persons had been successfully contacted, had become symptomatic and had been tested for SARS-CoV-2, and whether alternative exposures other than the flight were known.

Results: Complete data that allowed for the calculation of attack rates were available for 108 contact persons (median age of 36 (IQR 24-53), 40% female), traveling on 46 flights with a median flight duration of 3 hours (IQR 2-3.5). 62 of these persons travelled after masking on flights became mandatory. 13/87 developed symptoms, 44/77 were tested (no data for 21 and 31). 13 persons (9 of whom had been SARS-CoV-2 positive) were excluded from the analysis of attack rates due to a likely alternative exposure. We thus identified 4 probable in-flight transmissions (2 of which occurred after the introduction of mandatory masking). The overall attack rate resulted in 4.2% (4/95; 95% CI: 1.4%-11.0%). Considering flights after mandatory masking, the attack rate was 3.6% (2/56, 95% CI 0.6%-13.4%), before masking 5.1% (2/39, 95% CI 0.9%-18.6%).

Conclusions: The risk of wild-type SARS-CoV-2 transmission during air travel seemed low, but not negligible. In order to formulate an effective, evidence-based NPI protocol for air travel, further studies considering the different transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and vaccination status are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin. The journal welcomes articles describing research on pathogenesis, epidemiology of infection, diagnosis and treatment, antibiotics and resistance, and immunology.
期刊最新文献
Antifungal Drug Susceptibility Profile of Candida kefyr Isolated from Clinical Samples and Dairy Products. Characterization of Virulence Genotypes, Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns, and Biofilm Synthesis in Salmonella spp Isolated from Foodborne Outbreaks. The Characteristic of Biofilm Formation in ESBL-Producing K. pneumoniae Isolates. Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Hypervirulent and Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from ICU Respiratory Infections. Predictors of Mortality, Drug Resistance, and Determinants among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriales Infections in Chinese Elderly Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1