使用OptiBP™移动应用程序测量BMI类别血压的准确性。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Blood Pressure Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1080/08037051.2022.2132214
Mary Caillat, Jean Degott, Arlene Wuerzner, Martin Proençain, Guillaume Bonnier, Jean-François Knebel, Chloé Stoll, Urvan Christen, Virginie Durgnat, Gregory Hofmann, Michel Burnier, Grégoire Wuerzner, Patrick Schoettker
{"title":"使用OptiBP™移动应用程序测量BMI类别血压的准确性。","authors":"Mary Caillat,&nbsp;Jean Degott,&nbsp;Arlene Wuerzner,&nbsp;Martin Proençain,&nbsp;Guillaume Bonnier,&nbsp;Jean-François Knebel,&nbsp;Chloé Stoll,&nbsp;Urvan Christen,&nbsp;Virginie Durgnat,&nbsp;Gregory Hofmann,&nbsp;Michel Burnier,&nbsp;Grégoire Wuerzner,&nbsp;Patrick Schoettker","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2022.2132214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Obesity is a clear risk factor for hypertension. Blood pressure (BP) measurement in obese patients may be biased by cuff size and upper arm shape which may affect the accuracy of measurements. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the OptiBP smartphone application for three different body mass index (BMI) categories (normal, overweight and obese).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants with a wide range of BP and BMI were recruited at Lausanne University Hospital's hypertension clinic in Switzerland. OptiBP estimated BP by recording an optical signal reflecting light from the participants' fingertips into a smartphone camera. Age, sex and BP distribution were collected to fulfil the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standards. Both auscultatory BP references and OptiBP BP were measured and compared using the simultaneous opposite arms method, as described in the 81060-2:2018 ISO norm. Subgroup analyses were performed for each BMI category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 414 recordings from 95 patients: 34 were overweight and 15 were obese. The OptiBP application had a performance acceptance rate of 82%. The mean and standard deviation (SD) differences between the optical BP estimations and the auscultatory reference rates (criterion 1) were respected in all subgroups: SBP mean value was 2.08 (SD 7.58); 1.32 (6.44); -2.29 (5.62) respectively in obese, overweight and normal weight subgroup. For criterion 2, which investigates the precision errors on an individual level, the threshold for systolic BP in the obese group was slightly above the requirement for this criterion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the OptiBP application is easily applicable to overweight and obese participants. Differences between the reference measure and the OptiBP estimation were within ISO limits (criterion 1). In obese participants, the SD of mean error was outside criterion 2 limits. Whether auscultatory measurement, due to arm morphology or the OptiBP is associated with increasing bias in obese still needs to be studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":55591,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of blood pressure measurement across BMI categories using the OptiBP™ mobile application.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Caillat,&nbsp;Jean Degott,&nbsp;Arlene Wuerzner,&nbsp;Martin Proençain,&nbsp;Guillaume Bonnier,&nbsp;Jean-François Knebel,&nbsp;Chloé Stoll,&nbsp;Urvan Christen,&nbsp;Virginie Durgnat,&nbsp;Gregory Hofmann,&nbsp;Michel Burnier,&nbsp;Grégoire Wuerzner,&nbsp;Patrick Schoettker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08037051.2022.2132214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Obesity is a clear risk factor for hypertension. Blood pressure (BP) measurement in obese patients may be biased by cuff size and upper arm shape which may affect the accuracy of measurements. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the OptiBP smartphone application for three different body mass index (BMI) categories (normal, overweight and obese).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants with a wide range of BP and BMI were recruited at Lausanne University Hospital's hypertension clinic in Switzerland. OptiBP estimated BP by recording an optical signal reflecting light from the participants' fingertips into a smartphone camera. Age, sex and BP distribution were collected to fulfil the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standards. Both auscultatory BP references and OptiBP BP were measured and compared using the simultaneous opposite arms method, as described in the 81060-2:2018 ISO norm. Subgroup analyses were performed for each BMI category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 414 recordings from 95 patients: 34 were overweight and 15 were obese. The OptiBP application had a performance acceptance rate of 82%. The mean and standard deviation (SD) differences between the optical BP estimations and the auscultatory reference rates (criterion 1) were respected in all subgroups: SBP mean value was 2.08 (SD 7.58); 1.32 (6.44); -2.29 (5.62) respectively in obese, overweight and normal weight subgroup. For criterion 2, which investigates the precision errors on an individual level, the threshold for systolic BP in the obese group was slightly above the requirement for this criterion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the OptiBP application is easily applicable to overweight and obese participants. Differences between the reference measure and the OptiBP estimation were within ISO limits (criterion 1). In obese participants, the SD of mean error was outside criterion 2 limits. Whether auscultatory measurement, due to arm morphology or the OptiBP is associated with increasing bias in obese still needs to be studied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Pressure\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Pressure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2022.2132214\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2022.2132214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肥胖是高血压的明显危险因素。肥胖患者的血压测量可能会受到袖带大小和上臂形状的影响,从而影响测量的准确性。本研究旨在评估OptiBP智能手机应用程序对三种不同体重指数(BMI)类别(正常、超重和肥胖)的准确性。材料和方法:在瑞士洛桑大学医院高血压门诊招募血压和BMI范围广泛的参与者。OptiBP通过记录参与者指尖反射光线到智能手机摄像头的光信号来估计血压。收集年龄、性别和血压分布符合AAMI/ESH/ISO通用标准。按照81060-2:2018 ISO标准的描述,使用同时对臂法测量和比较听诊参考BP和OptiBP BP。对每个BMI类别进行亚组分析。结果:我们分析了95例患者的414份记录:34例超重,15例肥胖。OptiBP应用程序的性能接受率为82%。在所有亚组中,光学血压估计值与听诊参考率(标准1)之间的平均值和标准差(SD)差异均得到尊重:收缩压平均值为2.08 (SD 7.58);1.32 (6.44);肥胖、超重和正常体重亚组分别为-2.29(5.62)。标准2调查个体水平上的精度误差,肥胖组的收缩压阈值略高于该标准的要求。结论:本研究表明OptiBP应用程序易于适用于超重和肥胖参与者。参考测量值与OptiBP估计值之间的差异在ISO范围内(标准1)。在肥胖参与者中,平均误差的SD超出标准2的范围。听诊测量、臂形态或OptiBP是否与肥胖患者偏倚增加有关仍需研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of blood pressure measurement across BMI categories using the OptiBP™ mobile application.

Purpose: Obesity is a clear risk factor for hypertension. Blood pressure (BP) measurement in obese patients may be biased by cuff size and upper arm shape which may affect the accuracy of measurements. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the OptiBP smartphone application for three different body mass index (BMI) categories (normal, overweight and obese).

Materials and methods: Participants with a wide range of BP and BMI were recruited at Lausanne University Hospital's hypertension clinic in Switzerland. OptiBP estimated BP by recording an optical signal reflecting light from the participants' fingertips into a smartphone camera. Age, sex and BP distribution were collected to fulfil the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standards. Both auscultatory BP references and OptiBP BP were measured and compared using the simultaneous opposite arms method, as described in the 81060-2:2018 ISO norm. Subgroup analyses were performed for each BMI category.

Results: We analyzed 414 recordings from 95 patients: 34 were overweight and 15 were obese. The OptiBP application had a performance acceptance rate of 82%. The mean and standard deviation (SD) differences between the optical BP estimations and the auscultatory reference rates (criterion 1) were respected in all subgroups: SBP mean value was 2.08 (SD 7.58); 1.32 (6.44); -2.29 (5.62) respectively in obese, overweight and normal weight subgroup. For criterion 2, which investigates the precision errors on an individual level, the threshold for systolic BP in the obese group was slightly above the requirement for this criterion.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the OptiBP application is easily applicable to overweight and obese participants. Differences between the reference measure and the OptiBP estimation were within ISO limits (criterion 1). In obese participants, the SD of mean error was outside criterion 2 limits. Whether auscultatory measurement, due to arm morphology or the OptiBP is associated with increasing bias in obese still needs to be studied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For outstanding coverage of the latest advances in hypertension research, turn to Blood Pressure, a primary source for authoritative and timely information on all aspects of hypertension research and management. Features include: • Physiology and pathophysiology of blood pressure regulation • Primary and secondary hypertension • Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications of hypertension • Detection, treatment and follow-up of hypertension • Non pharmacological and pharmacological management • Large outcome trials in hypertension.
期刊最新文献
Diverse pharmacological properties, trial results, comorbidity prescribing and neural pathophysiology suggest European hypertension guideline downgrading of beta-blockers is not justified. Coffee and blood pressure: exciting news! Accuracy of home blood pressure measurement: the ACCURAPRESS study - a proposal of Young Investigator Group of the Italian Hypertension Society (Società Italiana dell'Ipertensione Arteriosa). Blood pressure response to close or loose contact between physician and patient during attended office blood pressure measurement. Psychological determinants of drug adherence and severity of hypertension in patients with apparently treatment-resistant vs. controlled hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1