在肯尼亚10个县实施强化指导方针,加快医学实验室认证。

IF 1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL African Journal of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1814
Susan K Musau, Christina Mwachari, Elvis Kirui, Junghae Muthoni, Taylor Lascko, Natalia Blanco, Alash'le Abimiku, Emily Koech
{"title":"在肯尼亚10个县实施强化指导方针,加快医学实验室认证。","authors":"Susan K Musau,&nbsp;Christina Mwachari,&nbsp;Elvis Kirui,&nbsp;Junghae Muthoni,&nbsp;Taylor Lascko,&nbsp;Natalia Blanco,&nbsp;Alash'le Abimiku,&nbsp;Emily Koech","doi":"10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite Kenya's roll-out of the Strengthening Laboratory Management Towards Accreditation programme in 2010, most laboratories had not made significant or tangible improvements towards accreditation by 2016. In April 2016, the University of Maryland, Baltimore enrolled 27 facilities in the standard Strengthening Laboratory Management Towards Accreditation programme.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to describe and evaluate the implementation of an intensified mentorship strategy on laboratory accreditation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In October 2017, the University of Maryland, Baltimore implemented intensive mentorship in 27 hospital laboratories in Nairobi, Kiambu, Meru, Embu, Muranga, Nyeri, Laikipia, Nyandarua, Tharaka-Nithi, and Kirinyaga counties in Kenya. Laboratories were paired with competent mentors whose skills were matched to facility gaps. Baseline and follow-up assessments were done between April 2016 and March 2019 using the World Health Organization's Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation Checklist and overall scores of the 12 Quality System Essentials and star ratings (from zero to five, based on scores) used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intensified mentorship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In September 2017, 14 laboratories scored zero stars, three scored one star, eight scored two stars, one scored three stars, and one laboratory was accredited. By March 2019, eight laboratories were accredited, five scored four stars, 10 scored three stars, three scored two stars, and only one scored one star. The average score change with the intensified approach was 81.5 versus 53.9 for the standard approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intensified mentorship strategy resulted in fast-tracked progress towards laboratory accreditation and can be adopted in similar resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":45412,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350484/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing an intensified mentorship approach towards accelerated medical laboratory accreditation in 10 counties in Kenya.\",\"authors\":\"Susan K Musau,&nbsp;Christina Mwachari,&nbsp;Elvis Kirui,&nbsp;Junghae Muthoni,&nbsp;Taylor Lascko,&nbsp;Natalia Blanco,&nbsp;Alash'le Abimiku,&nbsp;Emily Koech\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite Kenya's roll-out of the Strengthening Laboratory Management Towards Accreditation programme in 2010, most laboratories had not made significant or tangible improvements towards accreditation by 2016. In April 2016, the University of Maryland, Baltimore enrolled 27 facilities in the standard Strengthening Laboratory Management Towards Accreditation programme.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to describe and evaluate the implementation of an intensified mentorship strategy on laboratory accreditation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In October 2017, the University of Maryland, Baltimore implemented intensive mentorship in 27 hospital laboratories in Nairobi, Kiambu, Meru, Embu, Muranga, Nyeri, Laikipia, Nyandarua, Tharaka-Nithi, and Kirinyaga counties in Kenya. Laboratories were paired with competent mentors whose skills were matched to facility gaps. Baseline and follow-up assessments were done between April 2016 and March 2019 using the World Health Organization's Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation Checklist and overall scores of the 12 Quality System Essentials and star ratings (from zero to five, based on scores) used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intensified mentorship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In September 2017, 14 laboratories scored zero stars, three scored one star, eight scored two stars, one scored three stars, and one laboratory was accredited. By March 2019, eight laboratories were accredited, five scored four stars, 10 scored three stars, three scored two stars, and only one scored one star. The average score change with the intensified approach was 81.5 versus 53.9 for the standard approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intensified mentorship strategy resulted in fast-tracked progress towards laboratory accreditation and can be adopted in similar resource-limited settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:尽管肯尼亚在2010年推出了“加强实验室管理以获得认可”计划,但到2016年,大多数实验室在获得认可方面没有取得重大或切实的进展。2016年4月,马里兰大学巴尔的摩分校(University of Maryland, Baltimore)将27家设施纳入了标准的加强实验室管理认证计划。目的:本研究旨在描述和评估实验室认证强化指导策略的实施情况。方法:2017年10月,马里兰大学巴尔的摩分校在肯尼亚内罗毕、基安布、梅鲁、恩布、穆兰加、尼耶里、莱基皮亚、尼安达鲁阿、塔拉卡-尼提和基里尼亚加县的27家医院实验室实施了强化指导。实验室与有能力的导师配对,他们的技能与设施差距相匹配。在2016年4月至2019年3月期间,使用世界卫生组织的逐步实验室质量改进过程认证清单以及用于评估强化指导有效性的12个质量体系要点的总体得分和星级(基于分数从0到5)进行了基线和后续评估。结果:2017年9月,获得0星评价的实验室14家,获得1星评价的实验室3家,获得2星评价的实验室8家,获得3星评价的实验室1家,获得认可的实验室1家。截至2019年3月,共有8家实验室获得认可,其中5家获得4星,10家获得3星,3家获得2星,仅有1家获得1星。强化方法的平均得分变化为81.5分,而标准方法为53.9分。结论:强化指导策略导致实验室认证的快速进展,可以在类似的资源有限的环境中采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementing an intensified mentorship approach towards accelerated medical laboratory accreditation in 10 counties in Kenya.

Background: Despite Kenya's roll-out of the Strengthening Laboratory Management Towards Accreditation programme in 2010, most laboratories had not made significant or tangible improvements towards accreditation by 2016. In April 2016, the University of Maryland, Baltimore enrolled 27 facilities in the standard Strengthening Laboratory Management Towards Accreditation programme.

Objective: This study aimed to describe and evaluate the implementation of an intensified mentorship strategy on laboratory accreditation.

Methods: In October 2017, the University of Maryland, Baltimore implemented intensive mentorship in 27 hospital laboratories in Nairobi, Kiambu, Meru, Embu, Muranga, Nyeri, Laikipia, Nyandarua, Tharaka-Nithi, and Kirinyaga counties in Kenya. Laboratories were paired with competent mentors whose skills were matched to facility gaps. Baseline and follow-up assessments were done between April 2016 and March 2019 using the World Health Organization's Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation Checklist and overall scores of the 12 Quality System Essentials and star ratings (from zero to five, based on scores) used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intensified mentorship.

Results: In September 2017, 14 laboratories scored zero stars, three scored one star, eight scored two stars, one scored three stars, and one laboratory was accredited. By March 2019, eight laboratories were accredited, five scored four stars, 10 scored three stars, three scored two stars, and only one scored one star. The average score change with the intensified approach was 81.5 versus 53.9 for the standard approach.

Conclusion: The intensified mentorship strategy resulted in fast-tracked progress towards laboratory accreditation and can be adopted in similar resource-limited settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, the official journal of ASLM, focuses on the role of the laboratory and its professionals in the clinical and public healthcare sectors,and is specifically based on an African frame of reference. Emphasis is on all aspects that promote and contribute to the laboratory medicine practices of Africa. This includes, amongst others: laboratories, biomedical scientists and clinicians, medical community, public health officials and policy makers, laboratory systems and policies (translation of laboratory knowledge, practices and technologies in clinical care), interfaces of laboratory with medical science, laboratory-based epidemiology, laboratory investigations, evidence-based effectiveness in real world (actual) settings.
期刊最新文献
Pathobiology of HIV-related metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities: Towards a unifying mechanism. An audit of the iron status of patients at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, in Johannesburg, South Africa. Carriers of the m.3243A>G variant should not be labelled with an acronym before they have been systematically screened for multisystem disease. Challenges with communication of critical laboratory results in a resource-limited setting in South Africa. Association between coagulation indicators and menorrhagia among women in Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1