非计划切除对软组织肉瘤患者肿瘤预后的影响:490例患者的单中心回顾性评价

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.5152/j.aott.2022.21373
Andaç Celasun Alsina, Federico Sacchetti, Hüseyin Kaya, Banu Yaman, İpek Tamsel, Dündar Sabah
{"title":"非计划切除对软组织肉瘤患者肿瘤预后的影响:490例患者的单中心回顾性评价","authors":"Andaç Celasun Alsina,&nbsp;Federico Sacchetti,&nbsp;Hüseyin Kaya,&nbsp;Banu Yaman,&nbsp;İpek Tamsel,&nbsp;Dündar Sabah","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2022.21373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) compare the oncological results of patients who underwent re-excision after unplanned excision with those who underwent planned excision and (2) analyze the impact of local recurrences on oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with soft tissue sarcoma who had been treated in our center between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: Group PE (Planned excision; n=345) and group UE (Unplanned excision; n=145). Two groups were compared in terms of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Local recurrences effects over MFS and OS were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 26 (17.9%) local recurrences in the UE group and 30 (8.7%) local recurrences in the PE group (P=0.005). There was no difference in MFS and OS between study groups (P=0.278 and P=0.848, respectively). Five years MFS rates of UE and PE groups were 76.4% and 73.6%, and five-year OS rates of UE and PE groups were 70.3% and 73.9%, respectively (P=0.417, P=0.656). Patients with local recurrence had a 1.96 times higher risk of metastasis than patients without local recurrence (P=0.008). Patients with local recurrence had 1.65 times higher risk of mortality than patients without local recurrence (P=0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although local recurrence is much more common in the UE group, this outcome does not seem to affect MFS or OS. These results indicate that similar outcomes can be achieved if UE patients are referred and appropriately treated with wide re-resections.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Therapeutic Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7097,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2e/ca/aott-56-4-272.PMC9612672.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the unplanned excision on the oncological outcomes of patients with soft tissue sarcomas: a single-center retrospective review of 490 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Andaç Celasun Alsina,&nbsp;Federico Sacchetti,&nbsp;Hüseyin Kaya,&nbsp;Banu Yaman,&nbsp;İpek Tamsel,&nbsp;Dündar Sabah\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/j.aott.2022.21373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) compare the oncological results of patients who underwent re-excision after unplanned excision with those who underwent planned excision and (2) analyze the impact of local recurrences on oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with soft tissue sarcoma who had been treated in our center between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: Group PE (Planned excision; n=345) and group UE (Unplanned excision; n=145). Two groups were compared in terms of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Local recurrences effects over MFS and OS were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 26 (17.9%) local recurrences in the UE group and 30 (8.7%) local recurrences in the PE group (P=0.005). There was no difference in MFS and OS between study groups (P=0.278 and P=0.848, respectively). Five years MFS rates of UE and PE groups were 76.4% and 73.6%, and five-year OS rates of UE and PE groups were 70.3% and 73.9%, respectively (P=0.417, P=0.656). Patients with local recurrence had a 1.96 times higher risk of metastasis than patients without local recurrence (P=0.008). Patients with local recurrence had 1.65 times higher risk of mortality than patients without local recurrence (P=0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although local recurrence is much more common in the UE group, this outcome does not seem to affect MFS or OS. These results indicate that similar outcomes can be achieved if UE patients are referred and appropriately treated with wide re-resections.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Therapeutic Study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2e/ca/aott-56-4-272.PMC9612672.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2022.21373\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2022.21373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在(1)比较非计划切除与计划切除后再切除患者的肿瘤结果;(2)分析局部复发对肿瘤结果的影响。方法:回顾性分析我院2000 ~ 2018年收治的软组织肉瘤患者。患者分为两组:PE组(计划切除组);n=345)和UE组(非计划切除;n = 145)。比较两组患者的局部无复发生存期(LRFS)、无转移生存期(MFS)和总生存期(OS)。局部复发对MFS和OS的影响也进行了分析。结果:UE组局部复发26例(17.9%),PE组局部复发30例(8.7%)(P=0.005)。研究组间MFS和OS无差异(P=0.278和P=0.848)。UE组和PE组5年MFS分别为76.4%和73.6%,UE组和PE组5年OS分别为70.3%和73.9% (P=0.417, P=0.656)。局部复发患者的转移风险是无局部复发患者的1.96倍(P=0.008)。局部复发患者的死亡率是无局部复发患者的1.65倍(P=0.047)。结论:虽然局部复发在UE组更为常见,但这一结果似乎并不影响MFS或OS。这些结果表明,如果UE患者被转诊并接受适当的大面积切除治疗,可以达到类似的结果。证据等级:III级,治疗性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of the unplanned excision on the oncological outcomes of patients with soft tissue sarcomas: a single-center retrospective review of 490 patients.

Objective: This study aimed to (1) compare the oncological results of patients who underwent re-excision after unplanned excision with those who underwent planned excision and (2) analyze the impact of local recurrences on oncological outcomes.

Methods: Patients with soft tissue sarcoma who had been treated in our center between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: Group PE (Planned excision; n=345) and group UE (Unplanned excision; n=145). Two groups were compared in terms of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Local recurrences effects over MFS and OS were also analyzed.

Results: There were 26 (17.9%) local recurrences in the UE group and 30 (8.7%) local recurrences in the PE group (P=0.005). There was no difference in MFS and OS between study groups (P=0.278 and P=0.848, respectively). Five years MFS rates of UE and PE groups were 76.4% and 73.6%, and five-year OS rates of UE and PE groups were 70.3% and 73.9%, respectively (P=0.417, P=0.656). Patients with local recurrence had a 1.96 times higher risk of metastasis than patients without local recurrence (P=0.008). Patients with local recurrence had 1.65 times higher risk of mortality than patients without local recurrence (P=0.047).

Conclusion: Although local recurrence is much more common in the UE group, this outcome does not seem to affect MFS or OS. These results indicate that similar outcomes can be achieved if UE patients are referred and appropriately treated with wide re-resections.

Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic Study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica (AOTT) is an international, scientific, open access periodical published in accordance with independent, unbiased, and double-blinded peer-review principles. The journal is the official publication of the Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. It is published bimonthly in January, March, May, July, September, and November. The publication language of the journal is English. The aim of the journal is to publish original studies of the highest scientific and clinical value in orthopedics, traumatology, and related disciplines. The scope of the journal includes but not limited to diagnostic, treatment, and prevention methods related to orthopedics and traumatology. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica publishes clinical and basic research articles, case reports, personal clinical and technical notes, systematic reviews and meta-analyses and letters to the Editor. Proceedings of scientific meetings are also considered for publication. The target audience of the journal includes healthcare professionals, physicians, and researchers who are interested or working in orthopedics and traumatology field, and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
An investigation into the frequency and risk factors of low back pain following surgical treatment of isolated calcaneal fractures Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithm for the diagnosis of hip fracture on plain radiography with decision-making physicians: a validation study Peculiar reaction of oxidized zirconium from a total knee arthroplasty prosthesis: A case report An investigation into the frequency and risk factors of low back pain following surgical treatment of isolated calcaneal fractures Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithm for the diagnosis of hip fracture on plain radiography with decision-making physicians: a validation study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1