急性医学的早期高级决策:对卫生政策和实践影响的重要审查。

Q3 Medicine Acute Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.52964/AMJA.0911
N Irvine, R Van Der Meer, I Megiddo
{"title":"急性医学的早期高级决策:对卫生政策和实践影响的重要审查。","authors":"N Irvine,&nbsp;R Van Der Meer,&nbsp;I Megiddo","doi":"10.52964/AMJA.0911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>UK urgent care health policies advocate senior clinical decision-making at the point of referral into the system. The costs of employing senior clinicians in this role are substantial with little evidence of the value they bring over other strategies, particularly for patient outcomes. We sought to explore current remote and ambulatory emergency care decision-making in acute medical care in a large central healthcare system - NHS Scotland. We found that many sites use remote decision-making for some allocation decisions. However, involvement of clinical expertise varies, and available decision-aids are few. There is also variation in access to resources that facilitate non-admission. Research into the value that senior clinicians bring to this task over other strategies is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early senior decision-making in acute medicine: a critical review of health policy and implications for practice.\",\"authors\":\"N Irvine,&nbsp;R Van Der Meer,&nbsp;I Megiddo\",\"doi\":\"10.52964/AMJA.0911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>UK urgent care health policies advocate senior clinical decision-making at the point of referral into the system. The costs of employing senior clinicians in this role are substantial with little evidence of the value they bring over other strategies, particularly for patient outcomes. We sought to explore current remote and ambulatory emergency care decision-making in acute medical care in a large central healthcare system - NHS Scotland. We found that many sites use remote decision-making for some allocation decisions. However, involvement of clinical expertise varies, and available decision-aids are few. There is also variation in access to resources that facilitate non-admission. Research into the value that senior clinicians bring to this task over other strategies is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0911\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国紧急护理卫生政策提倡高级临床决策点转介到系统。聘请高级临床医生担任这一角色的成本很高,几乎没有证据表明他们比其他策略带来的价值,特别是对患者的治疗效果。我们试图探索当前远程和门诊急诊护理决策在一个大型中央医疗保健系统- NHS苏格兰急症医疗护理。我们发现许多站点使用远程决策来进行一些分配决策。然而,临床专家的参与各不相同,可用的决策辅助很少。在获取有利于不被录取的资源方面也存在差异。需要研究高级临床医生在这项任务中比其他策略带来的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early senior decision-making in acute medicine: a critical review of health policy and implications for practice.

UK urgent care health policies advocate senior clinical decision-making at the point of referral into the system. The costs of employing senior clinicians in this role are substantial with little evidence of the value they bring over other strategies, particularly for patient outcomes. We sought to explore current remote and ambulatory emergency care decision-making in acute medical care in a large central healthcare system - NHS Scotland. We found that many sites use remote decision-making for some allocation decisions. However, involvement of clinical expertise varies, and available decision-aids are few. There is also variation in access to resources that facilitate non-admission. Research into the value that senior clinicians bring to this task over other strategies is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acute Medicine
Acute Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: These are usually commissioned by the editorial team in accordance with a cycle running over several years. Authors wishing to submit a review relevant to Acute Medicine are advised to contact the editor before writing this. Unsolicited review articles received for consideration may be included if the subject matter is considered of interest to the readership, provided the topic has not already been covered in a recent edition. Review articles are usually 3000-5000 words and may include tables, pictures and other figures as required for the text. Include 3 or 4 ‘key points’ summarising the main teaching messages.
期刊最新文献
Point-of-care ultrasound for the diagnosis of an atypical small bowel obstruction in a cannabis user: a case report. Editorial - Acute Medical Care: "Exit block". Improving Telemetry use in the Acute Assessment Unit. Point of Care Ultrasound Bladder Volume Calculation on the Acute Medical Unit. Evaluating dynamic patterns in mortality before and after reconfiguration of the Danish emergency healthcare system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1