非整倍体植入前基因检测(PGT-A)对胚胎移植患者重要结局的影响:一项荟萃分析。

Luis H Sordia-Hernandez, Felipe A Morales-Martinez, Fernando Díaz González-Colmenero, Andrea Flores-Rodriguez, Paloma C Leyva-Camacho, Maria Ofelia Sordia-Piñeyro, Otto H Valdés-Martínez, Selene M García-Luna, René Rodríguez-Guajardo, Luis H Sordia-Piñeyro
{"title":"非整倍体植入前基因检测(PGT-A)对胚胎移植患者重要结局的影响:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Luis H Sordia-Hernandez,&nbsp;Felipe A Morales-Martinez,&nbsp;Fernando Díaz González-Colmenero,&nbsp;Andrea Flores-Rodriguez,&nbsp;Paloma C Leyva-Camacho,&nbsp;Maria Ofelia Sordia-Piñeyro,&nbsp;Otto H Valdés-Martínez,&nbsp;Selene M García-Luna,&nbsp;René Rodríguez-Guajardo,&nbsp;Luis H Sordia-Piñeyro","doi":"10.18502/jri.v23i4.10808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on patient-important reproductive outcomes after in vitro fertilization (IVF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized and non-randomized studies have been sought in Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials since each database's inception through May 2021. Main keywords used for the search strategy included \"Embryo transfer\", \"In vitro fertilization\", \"DNA sequencing\", and \"Comparative genome hybridization\". Studies were screened independently and in duplicate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were finally analyzed, representing a total of 2630 embryo transfers. The pooled OR for live birth rates were 1.45 (95%CI 0.24-8.78, I<sup>2</sup> 96%) and 1.66 (95%PI 0.15-18.01, 95%CI 0.98-2.83, I<sup>2</sup> 81%) derived from the NRSIs and the RCTs, respectively, in which the miscarriage rate were 1.25 (95%CI 0.19-8.33, I<sup>2</sup> 70%) and 0.57 (95%PI 0.06-5.34, 95%CI 0.27-1.21, I<sup>2</sup> 53%), and clinical pregnancy rates were 3.08 (95%CI 2.22-4.29, I<sup>2</sup> 0%) and 1.43 (95%PI 0.38-5.42, 95%CI 0.96-2.13, I<sup>2</sup> 68%). Influence analyses showed a greater treatment effect when excluding studies without patients at advanced maternal age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There seems to be no significant difference in reproductive outcomes when using PGT-A in the general population; however, the procedure seems advantageous for patients at advanced maternal age. Nevertheless, this warrants caution when recommending the procedure to all couples seeking ART, as the current possible benefits may not justify the additional costs for all groups of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":38826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","volume":"23 4","pages":"231-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1b/8c/JRI-23-231.PMC9674466.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) on Patient-Important Outcomes in Embryo Transfer Cases: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Luis H Sordia-Hernandez,&nbsp;Felipe A Morales-Martinez,&nbsp;Fernando Díaz González-Colmenero,&nbsp;Andrea Flores-Rodriguez,&nbsp;Paloma C Leyva-Camacho,&nbsp;Maria Ofelia Sordia-Piñeyro,&nbsp;Otto H Valdés-Martínez,&nbsp;Selene M García-Luna,&nbsp;René Rodríguez-Guajardo,&nbsp;Luis H Sordia-Piñeyro\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jri.v23i4.10808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on patient-important reproductive outcomes after in vitro fertilization (IVF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized and non-randomized studies have been sought in Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials since each database's inception through May 2021. Main keywords used for the search strategy included \\\"Embryo transfer\\\", \\\"In vitro fertilization\\\", \\\"DNA sequencing\\\", and \\\"Comparative genome hybridization\\\". Studies were screened independently and in duplicate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were finally analyzed, representing a total of 2630 embryo transfers. The pooled OR for live birth rates were 1.45 (95%CI 0.24-8.78, I<sup>2</sup> 96%) and 1.66 (95%PI 0.15-18.01, 95%CI 0.98-2.83, I<sup>2</sup> 81%) derived from the NRSIs and the RCTs, respectively, in which the miscarriage rate were 1.25 (95%CI 0.19-8.33, I<sup>2</sup> 70%) and 0.57 (95%PI 0.06-5.34, 95%CI 0.27-1.21, I<sup>2</sup> 53%), and clinical pregnancy rates were 3.08 (95%CI 2.22-4.29, I<sup>2</sup> 0%) and 1.43 (95%PI 0.38-5.42, 95%CI 0.96-2.13, I<sup>2</sup> 68%). Influence analyses showed a greater treatment effect when excluding studies without patients at advanced maternal age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There seems to be no significant difference in reproductive outcomes when using PGT-A in the general population; however, the procedure seems advantageous for patients at advanced maternal age. Nevertheless, this warrants caution when recommending the procedure to all couples seeking ART, as the current possible benefits may not justify the additional costs for all groups of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"231-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1b/8c/JRI-23-231.PMC9674466.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v23i4.10808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v23i4.10808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是评估胚胎植入前非整倍体基因检测(PGT-A)对体外受精(IVF)后患者重要生殖结局的影响。方法:从Ovid、MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials数据库建立到2021年5月,在这些数据库中寻找随机和非随机研究。搜索策略的主要关键词包括“胚胎移植”、“体外受精”、“DNA测序”和“比较基因组杂交”。研究是独立筛选的,一式两份。结果:最终分析了10项研究,共2630例胚胎移植。nrsi和RCTs的活产率合并OR分别为1.45 (95%CI 0.24-8.78, I2 96%)和1.66 (95%PI 0.15-18.01, 95%CI 0.98-2.83, I2 81%),其中流产率分别为1.25 (95%CI 0.19-8.33, I2 70%)和0.57 (95%PI 0.06-5.34, 95%CI 0.27-1.21, I2 53%),临床妊娠率分别为3.08 (95%CI 2.22-4.29, I2 0%)和1.43 (95%PI 0.38-5.42, 95%CI 0.96-2.13, I2 68%)。影响分析显示,当排除没有高龄产妇的研究时,治疗效果更大。结论:在普通人群中使用PGT-A对生殖结局似乎没有显著差异;然而,这种方法似乎对高龄产妇有利。然而,在向所有寻求抗逆转录病毒治疗的夫妇推荐该程序时,这值得谨慎,因为目前可能的益处可能不足以证明所有患者群体的额外费用是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effects of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) on Patient-Important Outcomes in Embryo Transfer Cases: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on patient-important reproductive outcomes after in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Methods: Randomized and non-randomized studies have been sought in Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials since each database's inception through May 2021. Main keywords used for the search strategy included "Embryo transfer", "In vitro fertilization", "DNA sequencing", and "Comparative genome hybridization". Studies were screened independently and in duplicate.

Results: Ten studies were finally analyzed, representing a total of 2630 embryo transfers. The pooled OR for live birth rates were 1.45 (95%CI 0.24-8.78, I2 96%) and 1.66 (95%PI 0.15-18.01, 95%CI 0.98-2.83, I2 81%) derived from the NRSIs and the RCTs, respectively, in which the miscarriage rate were 1.25 (95%CI 0.19-8.33, I2 70%) and 0.57 (95%PI 0.06-5.34, 95%CI 0.27-1.21, I2 53%), and clinical pregnancy rates were 3.08 (95%CI 2.22-4.29, I2 0%) and 1.43 (95%PI 0.38-5.42, 95%CI 0.96-2.13, I2 68%). Influence analyses showed a greater treatment effect when excluding studies without patients at advanced maternal age.

Conclusion: There seems to be no significant difference in reproductive outcomes when using PGT-A in the general population; however, the procedure seems advantageous for patients at advanced maternal age. Nevertheless, this warrants caution when recommending the procedure to all couples seeking ART, as the current possible benefits may not justify the additional costs for all groups of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
A Bizarre Case of Periovarian Hematoma in a Patient Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Managed Conservatively. Abandoned Cryopreserved Embryos: The Unresolved Challenge. Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles on Sperm Parameters in Fresh and Frozen Samples. Comparison of the Effect of Fenugreek and Metformin on Clinical and Metabolic Status of Cases with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized Trial. Evaluation of the Effect of Embryo Transfer Methods on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Retrospective Study and Future Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1