超声引导下血管内直接支架植入术对先天性冠心病患者临床疗效的影响

Edouard Cheneau, Laurent Leborgne, Daniel Canos, Augusto D Pichard, Lowell F Satler, William O Suddath, Kenneth M Kent, Joseph Lindsay, Neil Weissman, Ron Waksman
{"title":"超声引导下血管内直接支架植入术对先天性冠心病患者临床疗效的影响","authors":"Edouard Cheneau,&nbsp;Laurent Leborgne,&nbsp;Daniel Canos,&nbsp;Augusto D Pichard,&nbsp;Lowell F Satler,&nbsp;William O Suddath,&nbsp;Kenneth M Kent,&nbsp;Joseph Lindsay,&nbsp;Neil Weissman,&nbsp;Ron Waksman","doi":"10.1016/j.carrad.2004.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the fact that in animal models direct stenting (DS) reduces the vessel injury, in clinical practice this treatment strategy did not reduce late restenosis as compared to conventional strategy with balloon predilatation (PD). However, the influence of DS was not evaluated when stent expansion is optimized by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed the in-hospital and 1-year outcomes of patients at Washington Hospital Center who were treated with percutaneous coronary interventions and stent implantation when percutaneous intervention was guided by IVUS. Only patients treated for single de novo lesions were included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 1386 patients, 251 (18.1%) were treated with DS and 1135 (71.9%) were treated with PD. Pre- and postprocedure characteristics by angiography and IVUS were similar in both groups. Postprocedure non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in 4.9% of the DS group and in 12.5% of the PD group (<em>P</em>=.005). At 1-year follow-up, target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate was 4.9% in the DS group and 14.8% in the PD group (<em>P</em>=.005). DS strategy (odds ratio=.46, confidence interval=.25–.85, <em>P</em>=.013) was independently correlated to lower risk for revascularization in multivariate analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>When DS is implemented by IVUS assessment, it is associated with low in-hospital and long-term events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80261,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 15-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.carrad.2004.03.005","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided direct stenting on clinical outcome of patients treated for native coronary disease\",\"authors\":\"Edouard Cheneau,&nbsp;Laurent Leborgne,&nbsp;Daniel Canos,&nbsp;Augusto D Pichard,&nbsp;Lowell F Satler,&nbsp;William O Suddath,&nbsp;Kenneth M Kent,&nbsp;Joseph Lindsay,&nbsp;Neil Weissman,&nbsp;Ron Waksman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.carrad.2004.03.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the fact that in animal models direct stenting (DS) reduces the vessel injury, in clinical practice this treatment strategy did not reduce late restenosis as compared to conventional strategy with balloon predilatation (PD). However, the influence of DS was not evaluated when stent expansion is optimized by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed the in-hospital and 1-year outcomes of patients at Washington Hospital Center who were treated with percutaneous coronary interventions and stent implantation when percutaneous intervention was guided by IVUS. Only patients treated for single de novo lesions were included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 1386 patients, 251 (18.1%) were treated with DS and 1135 (71.9%) were treated with PD. Pre- and postprocedure characteristics by angiography and IVUS were similar in both groups. Postprocedure non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in 4.9% of the DS group and in 12.5% of the PD group (<em>P</em>=.005). At 1-year follow-up, target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate was 4.9% in the DS group and 14.8% in the PD group (<em>P</em>=.005). DS strategy (odds ratio=.46, confidence interval=.25–.85, <em>P</em>=.013) was independently correlated to lower risk for revascularization in multivariate analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>When DS is implemented by IVUS assessment, it is associated with low in-hospital and long-term events.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular radiation medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 15-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.carrad.2004.03.005\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular radiation medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1522186504000162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1522186504000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

尽管在动物模型中直接支架置入(DS)减少了血管损伤,但在临床实践中,与传统的球囊预扩张(PD)策略相比,这种治疗策略并没有减少晚期再狭窄。然而,当通过血管内超声(IVUS)评估优化支架扩张时,没有评估DS的影响。方法分析在IVUS引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和支架置入术在华盛顿医院中心的住院和1年预后。仅包括治疗单一新发病变的患者。结果1386例患者中,DS治疗251例(18.1%),PD治疗1135例(71.9%)。两组患者术前和术后血管造影及静脉造影特征相似。术后非q波心肌梗死(MI)发生率DS组为4.9%,PD组为12.5% (P= 0.005)。1年随访时,DS组靶区血管重建率为4.9%,PD组为14.8% (P= 0.005)。DS策略(优势比=。46,置信区间= 0.25 -。85, P= 0.013)在多变量分析中与较低的血运重建风险独立相关。结论通过IVUS评估实施DS时,院内及长期事件发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided direct stenting on clinical outcome of patients treated for native coronary disease

Background

Despite the fact that in animal models direct stenting (DS) reduces the vessel injury, in clinical practice this treatment strategy did not reduce late restenosis as compared to conventional strategy with balloon predilatation (PD). However, the influence of DS was not evaluated when stent expansion is optimized by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment.

Methods

We analyzed the in-hospital and 1-year outcomes of patients at Washington Hospital Center who were treated with percutaneous coronary interventions and stent implantation when percutaneous intervention was guided by IVUS. Only patients treated for single de novo lesions were included.

Results

In 1386 patients, 251 (18.1%) were treated with DS and 1135 (71.9%) were treated with PD. Pre- and postprocedure characteristics by angiography and IVUS were similar in both groups. Postprocedure non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in 4.9% of the DS group and in 12.5% of the PD group (P=.005). At 1-year follow-up, target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate was 4.9% in the DS group and 14.8% in the PD group (P=.005). DS strategy (odds ratio=.46, confidence interval=.25–.85, P=.013) was independently correlated to lower risk for revascularization in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

When DS is implemented by IVUS assessment, it is associated with low in-hospital and long-term events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts No change in endothelial-dependent vasomotion late after coronary irradiation Clinical and angiographic outcomes of cardiac transplant patients treated with intracoronary beta-radiation for in-stent restenosis Brachytherapy with gamma radiation of a coronary artery for in-stent restenosis may induce the regression of in-stent restenosis of an adjacent coronary artery without angioplasty. First case report and review of the literature Endovascular treatment of peripheral vascular disease: before or after coronary surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1