生物亲属:被遗忘的照顾者。

Karie A Gaska, Sandra Edmonds Crewe
{"title":"生物亲属:被遗忘的照顾者。","authors":"Karie A Gaska,&nbsp;Sandra Edmonds Crewe","doi":"10.1300/j045v22n03_08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The needs of biological relatives can often be overlooked because caseworkers are charged to act in the best interest of the child, meet the demands of foster parents and assume large court and paperwork responsibilities. Using a case study approach of a private therapeutic foster care agency located in Washington, DC, this study examines the needs of biological parents from the perspective of both the biological parents (n = 14) and child welfare workers (n = 14). It also addresses both systemic and personal barriers associated with the engagement and involvement of the biological parent. Findings are that there are varying levels of involvement of the biological parent; however, there is often confusion surrounding engagement practices absent reunification as a goal. This is especially relevant for kinship care where the goal of reunification is sometimes obscured by the placement of children with their families. Policy and practice implications are discussed with an emphasis on increasing the focus on biological relatives in the kinship care network. doi:10.1300/J045v22n03_08.</p>","PeriodicalId":73764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health & social policy","volume":" ","pages":"121-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/j045v22n03_08","citationCount":"84","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biological relatives:forgotten caregivers.\",\"authors\":\"Karie A Gaska,&nbsp;Sandra Edmonds Crewe\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/j045v22n03_08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The needs of biological relatives can often be overlooked because caseworkers are charged to act in the best interest of the child, meet the demands of foster parents and assume large court and paperwork responsibilities. Using a case study approach of a private therapeutic foster care agency located in Washington, DC, this study examines the needs of biological parents from the perspective of both the biological parents (n = 14) and child welfare workers (n = 14). It also addresses both systemic and personal barriers associated with the engagement and involvement of the biological parent. Findings are that there are varying levels of involvement of the biological parent; however, there is often confusion surrounding engagement practices absent reunification as a goal. This is especially relevant for kinship care where the goal of reunification is sometimes obscured by the placement of children with their families. Policy and practice implications are discussed with an emphasis on increasing the focus on biological relatives in the kinship care network. doi:10.1300/J045v22n03_08.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"121-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/j045v22n03_08\",\"citationCount\":\"84\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/j045v22n03_08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health & social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/j045v22n03_08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

摘要

有血缘关系的亲属的需要常常被忽视,因为社会工作者被要求以儿童的最佳利益行事,满足养父母的要求,承担大量的法庭和文书责任。本研究以位于华盛顿特区的一家私人治疗性寄养机构为个案研究方法,从亲生父母(n = 14)和儿童福利工作者(n = 14)的角度考察亲生父母的需求。它还解决了与亲生父母的参与和参与有关的系统和个人障碍。研究结果表明,亲生父母的参与程度各不相同;然而,在不以统一为目标的情况下,围绕交战实践经常存在混淆。这对亲属照料尤其重要,因为有时将儿童安置在其家人身边,使团聚的目标变得模糊不清。政策和实践的影响进行了讨论,重点是增加对血缘关系护理网络中的生物亲属的关注。doi: 10.1300 / J045v22n03_08。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biological relatives:forgotten caregivers.

The needs of biological relatives can often be overlooked because caseworkers are charged to act in the best interest of the child, meet the demands of foster parents and assume large court and paperwork responsibilities. Using a case study approach of a private therapeutic foster care agency located in Washington, DC, this study examines the needs of biological parents from the perspective of both the biological parents (n = 14) and child welfare workers (n = 14). It also addresses both systemic and personal barriers associated with the engagement and involvement of the biological parent. Findings are that there are varying levels of involvement of the biological parent; however, there is often confusion surrounding engagement practices absent reunification as a goal. This is especially relevant for kinship care where the goal of reunification is sometimes obscured by the placement of children with their families. Policy and practice implications are discussed with an emphasis on increasing the focus on biological relatives in the kinship care network. doi:10.1300/J045v22n03_08.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward Kansas mandatory seatbelt use: implications for public health policy. Providing Behavioral Incentives for Improved Health in Aging and Medicare Cost Control Acknowledgments Grandfathers raising grandchildren:an exploration of african american kinship networks. TANF policy: past, present, and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1