妇女健康倡议的特殊人群招募:成功与局限

Mona N Fouad , Giselle Corbie-Smith , David Curb , Barbara V Howard , Charles Mouton , Michael Simon , Greg Talavera , Joanice Thompson , Ching-Yun Wang , Cornelia White , Rosalie Young
{"title":"妇女健康倡议的特殊人群招募:成功与局限","authors":"Mona N Fouad ,&nbsp;Giselle Corbie-Smith ,&nbsp;David Curb ,&nbsp;Barbara V Howard ,&nbsp;Charles Mouton ,&nbsp;Michael Simon ,&nbsp;Greg Talavera ,&nbsp;Joanice Thompson ,&nbsp;Ching-Yun Wang ,&nbsp;Cornelia White ,&nbsp;Rosalie Young","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2004.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) is a study designed to examine the major causes of death and disability in women. This multi-arm, randomized, controlled trial of over 160,000 post-menopausal women of varying ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds and a goal of 20% of the study participants from minority populations is perhaps one of the most challenging recruitment efforts ever undertaken. Of the two main study arms, the Clinical Trial (CT) and the Observational Study (OS), the CT arm recruitment goal was to randomize 64,500 postmenopausal women 50–79 years of age. Women enrolled in the study will be followed for a period of 8–12 years. Ten clinical centers, out of a total of 40 throughout the United States, were selected as minority recruitment centers on the basis of their history of interaction with and access to large numbers of women from certain population subgroups. WHI enrollment began in September 1993 and ended in December 1998, resulting in the randomization and enrollment of a total of 161,856 (17.5% minority) women participants (68,135 (18.5% minority) in the CT and 93,721 (16.7%) in the OS). Within the CT arm, WHI achieved 101.7% of the goal of 48,000 participants in the Dietary Modification (DM) component, and 99.4% of the goal of 27,500 in the hormone-replacement component (HRT), with 11.8% overlap between DM and HRT. Of those who expressed initial interest in WHI, African Americans had the highest randomization yields in the DM component and Hispanics had the highest in the HRT component (15.2% and 10.2%, respectively). Overall, mass mailing was the greatest source of randomized participants. In addition, minority clinics found community outreach, personal referrals, and culturally appropriate recruitment materials particularly effective recruitment tools. For minority recruitment, our findings suggest that the key to high yield is reaching the target population through appropriate recruitment strategies and study information that get their attention. Also, once minority subjects are reached, they tend to participate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72706,"journal":{"name":"Controlled clinical trials","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages 335-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cct.2004.03.005","citationCount":"73","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special populations recruitment for the Women's Health Initiative: successes and limitations\",\"authors\":\"Mona N Fouad ,&nbsp;Giselle Corbie-Smith ,&nbsp;David Curb ,&nbsp;Barbara V Howard ,&nbsp;Charles Mouton ,&nbsp;Michael Simon ,&nbsp;Greg Talavera ,&nbsp;Joanice Thompson ,&nbsp;Ching-Yun Wang ,&nbsp;Cornelia White ,&nbsp;Rosalie Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2004.03.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) is a study designed to examine the major causes of death and disability in women. This multi-arm, randomized, controlled trial of over 160,000 post-menopausal women of varying ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds and a goal of 20% of the study participants from minority populations is perhaps one of the most challenging recruitment efforts ever undertaken. Of the two main study arms, the Clinical Trial (CT) and the Observational Study (OS), the CT arm recruitment goal was to randomize 64,500 postmenopausal women 50–79 years of age. Women enrolled in the study will be followed for a period of 8–12 years. Ten clinical centers, out of a total of 40 throughout the United States, were selected as minority recruitment centers on the basis of their history of interaction with and access to large numbers of women from certain population subgroups. WHI enrollment began in September 1993 and ended in December 1998, resulting in the randomization and enrollment of a total of 161,856 (17.5% minority) women participants (68,135 (18.5% minority) in the CT and 93,721 (16.7%) in the OS). Within the CT arm, WHI achieved 101.7% of the goal of 48,000 participants in the Dietary Modification (DM) component, and 99.4% of the goal of 27,500 in the hormone-replacement component (HRT), with 11.8% overlap between DM and HRT. Of those who expressed initial interest in WHI, African Americans had the highest randomization yields in the DM component and Hispanics had the highest in the HRT component (15.2% and 10.2%, respectively). Overall, mass mailing was the greatest source of randomized participants. In addition, minority clinics found community outreach, personal referrals, and culturally appropriate recruitment materials particularly effective recruitment tools. For minority recruitment, our findings suggest that the key to high yield is reaching the target population through appropriate recruitment strategies and study information that get their attention. Also, once minority subjects are reached, they tend to participate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Controlled clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 335-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cct.2004.03.005\",\"citationCount\":\"73\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Controlled clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197245604000339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Controlled clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197245604000339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 73

摘要

妇女健康倡议(WHI)是一项研究,旨在调查妇女死亡和残疾的主要原因。这项多组、随机、对照试验纳入了16万多名不同种族和社会经济背景的绝经后妇女,其中20%的研究参与者来自少数民族,这可能是有史以来最具挑战性的招募工作之一。在临床试验(CT)和观察性研究(OS)两个主要研究组中,CT组的招募目标是随机抽取64,500名50-79岁的绝经后妇女。参与这项研究的女性将被随访8-12年。在美国总共40个临床中心中,有10个被选为少数民族招募中心,这是基于它们与来自特定人口亚群的大量妇女互动和接触的历史。WHI的入组开始于1993年9月,截止于1998年12月,共纳入161,856名(17.5%的少数族裔)女性参与者(CT组68,135名(18.5%的少数族裔),OS组93,721名(16.7%))。在CT组中,WHI在饮食调整(DM)部分实现了48,000名参与者的目标的101.7%,在激素替代(HRT)部分实现了27,500名参与者的目标的99.4%,DM和HRT之间有11.8%的重叠。在那些最初对WHI感兴趣的人中,非裔美国人在糖尿病部分的随机化率最高,西班牙裔美国人在HRT部分的随机化率最高(分别为15.2%和10.2%)。总的来说,群发邮件是随机参与者的最大来源。此外,少数族裔诊所发现社区外展、个人转诊和文化上合适的招聘材料是特别有效的招聘工具。对于少数民族的招聘,我们的研究结果表明,高产的关键是通过适当的招聘策略和研究信息来吸引目标人群的注意。此外,一旦触及少数群体,他们往往会参与其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Special populations recruitment for the Women's Health Initiative: successes and limitations

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) is a study designed to examine the major causes of death and disability in women. This multi-arm, randomized, controlled trial of over 160,000 post-menopausal women of varying ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds and a goal of 20% of the study participants from minority populations is perhaps one of the most challenging recruitment efforts ever undertaken. Of the two main study arms, the Clinical Trial (CT) and the Observational Study (OS), the CT arm recruitment goal was to randomize 64,500 postmenopausal women 50–79 years of age. Women enrolled in the study will be followed for a period of 8–12 years. Ten clinical centers, out of a total of 40 throughout the United States, were selected as minority recruitment centers on the basis of their history of interaction with and access to large numbers of women from certain population subgroups. WHI enrollment began in September 1993 and ended in December 1998, resulting in the randomization and enrollment of a total of 161,856 (17.5% minority) women participants (68,135 (18.5% minority) in the CT and 93,721 (16.7%) in the OS). Within the CT arm, WHI achieved 101.7% of the goal of 48,000 participants in the Dietary Modification (DM) component, and 99.4% of the goal of 27,500 in the hormone-replacement component (HRT), with 11.8% overlap between DM and HRT. Of those who expressed initial interest in WHI, African Americans had the highest randomization yields in the DM component and Hispanics had the highest in the HRT component (15.2% and 10.2%, respectively). Overall, mass mailing was the greatest source of randomized participants. In addition, minority clinics found community outreach, personal referrals, and culturally appropriate recruitment materials particularly effective recruitment tools. For minority recruitment, our findings suggest that the key to high yield is reaching the target population through appropriate recruitment strategies and study information that get their attention. Also, once minority subjects are reached, they tend to participate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board On the generation and ownership of alpha in medical studies Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels Geographic variability in patient characteristics, treatment and outcome in an international trial of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction Analyzing bronchodilation with emphasis on disease type, age and sex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1