{"title":"病人同意法它与脊椎按摩师和整骨疗法有关。","authors":"M A Hartley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1992, the High Court of Australia handed down a decision on consent to medical treatment. The case had widespread media publicity, and caused consternation among many members of the medical profession. This article explains the law on consent to treatment by health practitioners and considers the relevance of the law for chiropractors and osteopaths.</p>","PeriodicalId":93829,"journal":{"name":"Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia","volume":"5 1","pages":"8-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2050609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The law of patient consent. Its relevance to chiropractors and osteopaths.\",\"authors\":\"M A Hartley\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 1992, the High Court of Australia handed down a decision on consent to medical treatment. The case had widespread media publicity, and caused consternation among many members of the medical profession. This article explains the law on consent to treatment by health practitioners and considers the relevance of the law for chiropractors and osteopaths.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"8-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2050609/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The law of patient consent. Its relevance to chiropractors and osteopaths.
In 1992, the High Court of Australia handed down a decision on consent to medical treatment. The case had widespread media publicity, and caused consternation among many members of the medical profession. This article explains the law on consent to treatment by health practitioners and considers the relevance of the law for chiropractors and osteopaths.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
