一项为期12个月的治疗偏头痛的脊椎指压疗法临床试验。

P J Tuchin
{"title":"一项为期12个月的治疗偏头痛的脊椎指压疗法临床试验。","authors":"P J Tuchin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) in the treatment of migraine.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective clinical trial of twelve months duration. The trial consisted of 3 stages: two month pre-treatment, two month treatment, and two months post treatment. Comparison of outcomes to the initial baseline factors was made and also 6 months after the cessation of the study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Chiropractic Research Centre of Macquarie University.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Thirty two volunteers, between the ages of 20 to 65 were recruited through media advertising. The diagnosis of migraine was based on a self reported detailed questionnaire, with minimum of one migraine per month.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Two months of chiropractic SMT at vertebral fixations determined by the practitioner, through orthopedic and chiropractic testing.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Participants completed diaries during the entire trial noting the frequency, intensity (visual analogue score), duration, disability, associated symptoms and use of medication for each migraine episode.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial 32 participants showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in migraine frequency, VAS, disability, and medication use, when compared to initial baseline levels. A further assessment of outcomes after a six month follow up (based on 24 participants), continued to show statistically significant improvement in migraine frequency (p < 0.005), VAS (p < 0.01), disability (p < 0.05), and medication use (p < 0.01), when compared to initial baseline levels. In addition, information was collected regarding any changes in neck pain following chiropractic SMT. The results indicated that 14 participants (58%) reported no increase in neck pain as a consequence of the two months of SMT. Five participants (21%) reported a slight increase, three participants (13%) reported mild pain, and two participants (8%) reported moderate pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study support the hypothesis that Chiropractic SMT is an effective treatment for migraine, in some people. However, a larger controlled study is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":93829,"journal":{"name":"Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia","volume":"8 2","pages":"61-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2051091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A twelve month clinical trial of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for migraine.\",\"authors\":\"P J Tuchin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) in the treatment of migraine.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective clinical trial of twelve months duration. The trial consisted of 3 stages: two month pre-treatment, two month treatment, and two months post treatment. Comparison of outcomes to the initial baseline factors was made and also 6 months after the cessation of the study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Chiropractic Research Centre of Macquarie University.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Thirty two volunteers, between the ages of 20 to 65 were recruited through media advertising. The diagnosis of migraine was based on a self reported detailed questionnaire, with minimum of one migraine per month.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Two months of chiropractic SMT at vertebral fixations determined by the practitioner, through orthopedic and chiropractic testing.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Participants completed diaries during the entire trial noting the frequency, intensity (visual analogue score), duration, disability, associated symptoms and use of medication for each migraine episode.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial 32 participants showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in migraine frequency, VAS, disability, and medication use, when compared to initial baseline levels. A further assessment of outcomes after a six month follow up (based on 24 participants), continued to show statistically significant improvement in migraine frequency (p < 0.005), VAS (p < 0.01), disability (p < 0.05), and medication use (p < 0.01), when compared to initial baseline levels. In addition, information was collected regarding any changes in neck pain following chiropractic SMT. The results indicated that 14 participants (58%) reported no increase in neck pain as a consequence of the two months of SMT. Five participants (21%) reported a slight increase, three participants (13%) reported mild pain, and two participants (8%) reported moderate pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study support the hypothesis that Chiropractic SMT is an effective treatment for migraine, in some people. However, a larger controlled study is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"61-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2051091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价捏脊疗法(SMT)治疗偏头痛的疗效。设计:一项为期12个月的前瞻性临床试验。试验分为3个阶段:治疗前2个月,治疗后2个月和治疗前2个月。将结果与初始基线因素进行比较,并在研究结束后6个月进行比较。单位:麦考瑞大学捏脊研究中心。参与者:通过媒体广告招募了32名年龄在20 - 65岁之间的志愿者。偏头痛的诊断是基于一份自我报告的详细问卷,每月至少有一次偏头痛。干预措施:两个月的脊椎按摩SMT在椎体固定由执业医师确定,通过矫形和脊椎按摩测试。主要结果测量:参与者在整个试验期间完成日记,记录每次偏头痛发作的频率、强度(视觉模拟评分)、持续时间、残疾、相关症状和药物使用情况。结果:与初始基线水平相比,最初的32名参与者在偏头痛频率、VAS、残疾和药物使用方面有统计学意义(p < 0.05)的改善。在6个月的随访后(基于24名参与者)的进一步评估结果显示,与初始基线水平相比,偏头痛频率(p < 0.005)、VAS (p < 0.01)、残疾(p < 0.05)和药物使用(p < 0.01)的改善仍具有统计学意义。此外,还收集了脊椎按摩SMT后颈部疼痛变化的相关信息。结果表明,14名参与者(58%)报告两个月的SMT治疗后颈部疼痛没有增加。5名参与者(21%)报告轻微疼痛增加,3名参与者(13%)报告轻度疼痛,2名参与者(8%)报告中度疼痛。结论:本研究的结果支持了一种假设,即脊椎推拿SMT对某些人来说是一种有效的偏头痛治疗方法。然而,需要更大规模的对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A twelve month clinical trial of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for migraine.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) in the treatment of migraine.

Design: A prospective clinical trial of twelve months duration. The trial consisted of 3 stages: two month pre-treatment, two month treatment, and two months post treatment. Comparison of outcomes to the initial baseline factors was made and also 6 months after the cessation of the study.

Setting: Chiropractic Research Centre of Macquarie University.

Participants: Thirty two volunteers, between the ages of 20 to 65 were recruited through media advertising. The diagnosis of migraine was based on a self reported detailed questionnaire, with minimum of one migraine per month.

Interventions: Two months of chiropractic SMT at vertebral fixations determined by the practitioner, through orthopedic and chiropractic testing.

Main outcome measures: Participants completed diaries during the entire trial noting the frequency, intensity (visual analogue score), duration, disability, associated symptoms and use of medication for each migraine episode.

Results: The initial 32 participants showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in migraine frequency, VAS, disability, and medication use, when compared to initial baseline levels. A further assessment of outcomes after a six month follow up (based on 24 participants), continued to show statistically significant improvement in migraine frequency (p < 0.005), VAS (p < 0.01), disability (p < 0.05), and medication use (p < 0.01), when compared to initial baseline levels. In addition, information was collected regarding any changes in neck pain following chiropractic SMT. The results indicated that 14 participants (58%) reported no increase in neck pain as a consequence of the two months of SMT. Five participants (21%) reported a slight increase, three participants (13%) reported mild pain, and two participants (8%) reported moderate pain.

Conclusion: The results of this study support the hypothesis that Chiropractic SMT is an effective treatment for migraine, in some people. However, a larger controlled study is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Searching for the evidence: a practical guide to some online databases in chiropractic and osteopathy. A clinical model for the diagnosis and management of patients with cervical spine syndromes. Spinal musculoskeletal injuries associated with swimming: a discussion of technique. Spine cancer: a summary and review. Risk management for chiropractors and osteopaths: informed consent. A common law requirement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1