卡特里娜飓风和丽塔飓风期间卫生保健提供者的应急准备和专业能力:试点研究结果

Lynn A. Slepski RN, MSN, PhD (c), CCNS
{"title":"卡特里娜飓风和丽塔飓风期间卫生保健提供者的应急准备和专业能力:试点研究结果","authors":"Lynn A. Slepski RN, MSN, PhD (c), CCNS","doi":"10.1016/j.dmr.2007.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To date, no systematic examination of the preparedness of individual health care providers and their response capabilities during a large-scale disaster has been conducted. As a result, very little is known about what knowledge, skills and abilities, or <em>professional competencies</em> are needed, or how professional competency requirements may change depending on the circumstances of a disaster. The objective of this pilot study was to collect, explore, and describe background data on professional competencies from health care providers who were involved in the Hurricanes Katrina and/or Rita disaster responses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Utilizing an anonymous survey of a convenience sample, 200 health care providers attending 2 disaster conferences were asked to respond to open-ended questions about the competencies they needed and performed during their disaster response.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 200 respondents, registered nurses (37%) and physicians (24%) were the largest categories of providers. Basic clinical care (39%) and triage (26%) were the most frequent response skills reported; the areas wherein respondents felt least prepared were disaster-specific response skills (22%) and systems issues (34%). Only 22% of respondents reported that they did not know a specific skill. The 200 respondents made 495 individual recommendations for future responders, including actions to improve the respondent's personal preparedness (23%) and the need for training (25%). However, only 3% of the recommendations (n = 15) actually identified a specific type of training such as Advanced Cardiac Life Support or triage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Few respondents reported knowledge deficits. Rather, what they described was an abrupt change or transition from their everyday practice worlds that required accommodation in order to practice effectively. Current training programs generally focus on providing skills information. Further research is required to determine if training programs should address facilitating the transition process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84599,"journal":{"name":"Disaster management & response : DMR : an official publication of the Emergency Nurses Association","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 99-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.dmr.2007.08.001","citationCount":"97","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Preparedness and Professional Competency Among Health Care Providers During Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Pilot Study Results\",\"authors\":\"Lynn A. Slepski RN, MSN, PhD (c), CCNS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dmr.2007.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To date, no systematic examination of the preparedness of individual health care providers and their response capabilities during a large-scale disaster has been conducted. As a result, very little is known about what knowledge, skills and abilities, or <em>professional competencies</em> are needed, or how professional competency requirements may change depending on the circumstances of a disaster. The objective of this pilot study was to collect, explore, and describe background data on professional competencies from health care providers who were involved in the Hurricanes Katrina and/or Rita disaster responses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Utilizing an anonymous survey of a convenience sample, 200 health care providers attending 2 disaster conferences were asked to respond to open-ended questions about the competencies they needed and performed during their disaster response.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 200 respondents, registered nurses (37%) and physicians (24%) were the largest categories of providers. Basic clinical care (39%) and triage (26%) were the most frequent response skills reported; the areas wherein respondents felt least prepared were disaster-specific response skills (22%) and systems issues (34%). Only 22% of respondents reported that they did not know a specific skill. The 200 respondents made 495 individual recommendations for future responders, including actions to improve the respondent's personal preparedness (23%) and the need for training (25%). However, only 3% of the recommendations (n = 15) actually identified a specific type of training such as Advanced Cardiac Life Support or triage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Few respondents reported knowledge deficits. Rather, what they described was an abrupt change or transition from their everyday practice worlds that required accommodation in order to practice effectively. Current training programs generally focus on providing skills information. Further research is required to determine if training programs should address facilitating the transition process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disaster management & response : DMR : an official publication of the Emergency Nurses Association\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 99-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.dmr.2007.08.001\",\"citationCount\":\"97\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disaster management & response : DMR : an official publication of the Emergency Nurses Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540248707001009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster management & response : DMR : an official publication of the Emergency Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540248707001009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 97

摘要

迄今为止,还没有对个别卫生保健提供者的准备工作及其在大规模灾害中的反应能力进行系统检查。因此,对于需要什么样的知识、技能和能力或专业能力,或者专业能力的要求如何根据灾难的情况而变化,人们知之甚少。本初步研究的目的是收集、探索和描述参与卡特里娜飓风和/或丽塔飓风灾害应对的卫生保健提供者的专业能力背景数据。方法采用方便抽样的匿名调查方法,要求参加两次灾害会议的200名卫生保健提供者回答有关他们在灾害应对过程中所需和表现的能力的开放式问题。结果在200名受访者中,注册护士(37%)和医生(24%)是最大的提供者类别。基本临床护理(39%)和分诊(26%)是报告中最常见的应对技能;受访者认为准备最少的领域是灾害特定响应技能(22%)和系统问题(34%)。只有22%的受访者表示他们不知道一项特定的技能。200名受访者为未来的响应者提出了495项个人建议,包括改善受访者个人准备的行动(23%)和培训需求(25%)。然而,只有3%的建议(n = 15)真正确定了一种特定类型的训练,如高级心脏生命支持或分诊。结论少数被调查者存在知识缺陷。相反,他们所描述的是他们日常实践世界的突然变化或过渡,需要适应才能有效地练习。目前的培训项目通常侧重于提供技能信息。需要进一步的研究来确定培训计划是否应该解决促进过渡过程的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emergency Preparedness and Professional Competency Among Health Care Providers During Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Pilot Study Results

Background

To date, no systematic examination of the preparedness of individual health care providers and their response capabilities during a large-scale disaster has been conducted. As a result, very little is known about what knowledge, skills and abilities, or professional competencies are needed, or how professional competency requirements may change depending on the circumstances of a disaster. The objective of this pilot study was to collect, explore, and describe background data on professional competencies from health care providers who were involved in the Hurricanes Katrina and/or Rita disaster responses.

Methods

Utilizing an anonymous survey of a convenience sample, 200 health care providers attending 2 disaster conferences were asked to respond to open-ended questions about the competencies they needed and performed during their disaster response.

Results

Of the 200 respondents, registered nurses (37%) and physicians (24%) were the largest categories of providers. Basic clinical care (39%) and triage (26%) were the most frequent response skills reported; the areas wherein respondents felt least prepared were disaster-specific response skills (22%) and systems issues (34%). Only 22% of respondents reported that they did not know a specific skill. The 200 respondents made 495 individual recommendations for future responders, including actions to improve the respondent's personal preparedness (23%) and the need for training (25%). However, only 3% of the recommendations (n = 15) actually identified a specific type of training such as Advanced Cardiac Life Support or triage.

Conclusion

Few respondents reported knowledge deficits. Rather, what they described was an abrupt change or transition from their everyday practice worlds that required accommodation in order to practice effectively. Current training programs generally focus on providing skills information. Further research is required to determine if training programs should address facilitating the transition process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subject Index Editorial Board Author Index Table of Contents Affected Parents' and Other Stakeholders' Perception of a Fire Disaster Management in India: A Situational Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1