结直肠癌筛查:指南指南。

Viju P Deenadayalu, Douglas K Rex
{"title":"结直肠癌筛查:指南指南。","authors":"Viju P Deenadayalu,&nbsp;Douglas K Rex","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The best known guidelines for colorectal cancer screening in the United States are those of the US Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, the American Cancer Society, the United States Preventive Services Task Force, the American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Screening is currently endorsed for both average-risk and high-risk persons by all guideline groups. Some guidelines offer a menu of options for average-risk persons, from which patients and physicians can select according to their perceptions and values regarding effectiveness, risk, and upfront costs. The alternative approach of colonoscopy as the preferred strategy simplifies discussions with patients and better reflects current trends in procedure use in the United States. For patients who refuse invasive testing, fecal occult blood testing is available. Quantitative fecal immunochemical tests offer promise for improved performance compared with guaiac testing. Radiographic screening has declined, although double contrast barium enema still remains an option in some guidelines. Computed tomographic colonography remains under active consideration but is not yet endorsed by any of the guidelines. High risk is still based primarily on family history, and the guidelines are fairly consistent in adjusting screening modality and intervals according to family history.</p>","PeriodicalId":21173,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in gastroenterological disorders","volume":"7 4","pages":"204-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colorectal cancer screening: a guide to the guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Viju P Deenadayalu,&nbsp;Douglas K Rex\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The best known guidelines for colorectal cancer screening in the United States are those of the US Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, the American Cancer Society, the United States Preventive Services Task Force, the American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Screening is currently endorsed for both average-risk and high-risk persons by all guideline groups. Some guidelines offer a menu of options for average-risk persons, from which patients and physicians can select according to their perceptions and values regarding effectiveness, risk, and upfront costs. The alternative approach of colonoscopy as the preferred strategy simplifies discussions with patients and better reflects current trends in procedure use in the United States. For patients who refuse invasive testing, fecal occult blood testing is available. Quantitative fecal immunochemical tests offer promise for improved performance compared with guaiac testing. Radiographic screening has declined, although double contrast barium enema still remains an option in some guidelines. Computed tomographic colonography remains under active consideration but is not yet endorsed by any of the guidelines. High risk is still based primarily on family history, and the guidelines are fairly consistent in adjusting screening modality and intervals according to family history.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in gastroenterological disorders\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"204-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in gastroenterological disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in gastroenterological disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国最著名的结直肠癌筛查指南是美国结直肠癌多协会工作组、美国癌症协会、美国预防服务工作组、美国胃肠病学学会和美国胃肠内窥镜学会的指南。目前,所有指南小组都支持对平均风险和高风险人群进行筛查。一些指南为平均风险人群提供了一个选项菜单,患者和医生可以根据他们对有效性、风险和前期成本的看法和价值观进行选择。结肠镜检查作为首选策略的替代方法简化了与患者的讨论,并更好地反映了美国手术使用的当前趋势。对于拒绝侵入性检查的患者,可以使用粪便隐血检查。定量粪便免疫化学测试与愈创木测试相比,提供了改善性能的希望。尽管在一些指导方针中,双重对比钡灌肠仍然是一种选择,但放射检查已经减少。计算机断层结肠镜检查仍在积极考虑中,但尚未得到任何指南的认可。高风险仍然主要基于家族史,指南在根据家族史调整筛查方式和间隔方面是相当一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Colorectal cancer screening: a guide to the guidelines.

The best known guidelines for colorectal cancer screening in the United States are those of the US Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, the American Cancer Society, the United States Preventive Services Task Force, the American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Screening is currently endorsed for both average-risk and high-risk persons by all guideline groups. Some guidelines offer a menu of options for average-risk persons, from which patients and physicians can select according to their perceptions and values regarding effectiveness, risk, and upfront costs. The alternative approach of colonoscopy as the preferred strategy simplifies discussions with patients and better reflects current trends in procedure use in the United States. For patients who refuse invasive testing, fecal occult blood testing is available. Quantitative fecal immunochemical tests offer promise for improved performance compared with guaiac testing. Radiographic screening has declined, although double contrast barium enema still remains an option in some guidelines. Computed tomographic colonography remains under active consideration but is not yet endorsed by any of the guidelines. High risk is still based primarily on family history, and the guidelines are fairly consistent in adjusting screening modality and intervals according to family history.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Third Eye Retroscope: rationale, efficacy, challenges. Bifidobacterium infantis 35624: a novel probiotic for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Definitive therapy for internal hemorrhoids--new opportunities and options. Infectious disease. Early loss of immune cells and progressive immunodeficiency in HIV infection: it's all about the gut. Diarrhea. Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis: newly recognized cause of inflammatory diarrhea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1