家长对扩大新生儿筛查计划的意见。

Community genetics Pub Date : 2008-01-01 Epub Date: 2008-01-15 DOI:10.1159/000111635
Symone Detmar, Nynke Dijkstra, Niels Nijsingh, Marlies Rijnders, Marcel Verweij, Esther Hosli
{"title":"家长对扩大新生儿筛查计划的意见。","authors":"Symone Detmar,&nbsp;Nynke Dijkstra,&nbsp;Niels Nijsingh,&nbsp;Marlies Rijnders,&nbsp;Marcel Verweij,&nbsp;Esther Hosli","doi":"10.1159/000111635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in genomics will open up opportunities in the fields of genetic testing, early diagnosis and disease treatment. While neonatal screening is the field of application par excellencefor these developments, the debate on its potential benefits and drawbacks is mainly theoretically driven and based on the opinions of professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study of the perceptions, preferences and needs of parents (and parents to be) with respect to expansion of the neonatal screening programme. Seven focus group discussions were conducted. Using disease scenarios, 4 examples of conditions amenable to neonatal screening were discussed in depth. All focus group discussions were audio taped and content analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants thought that the medical benefits of screening were very important for the child. Assuming the availability of effective early medical treatment, almost 100% would be willing to participate in a screening programme. If such treatment were absent, their potential willingness would be much lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The divergence in attitudes and preferences we found in this study reflected the complexity inherent in any consideration of screening for additional conditions. To implement such options successfully and to direct applied research in genomics, it is important to develop a better understanding of the thinking of target groups, namely parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":80975,"journal":{"name":"Community genetics","volume":"11 1","pages":"11-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000111635","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental Opinions about the Expansion of the Neonatal Screening Programme.\",\"authors\":\"Symone Detmar,&nbsp;Nynke Dijkstra,&nbsp;Niels Nijsingh,&nbsp;Marlies Rijnders,&nbsp;Marcel Verweij,&nbsp;Esther Hosli\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000111635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in genomics will open up opportunities in the fields of genetic testing, early diagnosis and disease treatment. While neonatal screening is the field of application par excellencefor these developments, the debate on its potential benefits and drawbacks is mainly theoretically driven and based on the opinions of professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study of the perceptions, preferences and needs of parents (and parents to be) with respect to expansion of the neonatal screening programme. Seven focus group discussions were conducted. Using disease scenarios, 4 examples of conditions amenable to neonatal screening were discussed in depth. All focus group discussions were audio taped and content analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants thought that the medical benefits of screening were very important for the child. Assuming the availability of effective early medical treatment, almost 100% would be willing to participate in a screening programme. If such treatment were absent, their potential willingness would be much lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The divergence in attitudes and preferences we found in this study reflected the complexity inherent in any consideration of screening for additional conditions. To implement such options successfully and to direct applied research in genomics, it is important to develop a better understanding of the thinking of target groups, namely parents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community genetics\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"11-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000111635\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000111635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2008/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000111635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

背景:基因组学的进步将为基因检测、早期诊断和疾病治疗等领域带来机遇。虽然新生儿筛查是这些发展的卓越应用领域,但关于其潜在利弊的辩论主要是理论驱动和基于专业人士的意见。方法:我们对父母(和即将成为父母的)对扩大新生儿筛查计划的看法、偏好和需求进行了定性研究。共进行了七次焦点小组讨论。根据疾病情况,对4例适合新生儿筛查的情况进行了深入讨论。所有焦点小组讨论都录音并分析内容。结果:参与者认为筛查的医疗效益对孩子非常重要。假设可以获得有效的早期治疗,几乎100%的人愿意参加筛查计划。如果没有这样的治疗,他们的潜在意愿会低得多。结论:我们在这项研究中发现的态度和偏好的差异反映了任何考虑筛查额外条件的固有复杂性。为了成功地实施这些选择并指导基因组学的应用研究,重要的是要更好地了解目标群体,即父母的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parental Opinions about the Expansion of the Neonatal Screening Programme.

Background: Advances in genomics will open up opportunities in the fields of genetic testing, early diagnosis and disease treatment. While neonatal screening is the field of application par excellencefor these developments, the debate on its potential benefits and drawbacks is mainly theoretically driven and based on the opinions of professionals.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study of the perceptions, preferences and needs of parents (and parents to be) with respect to expansion of the neonatal screening programme. Seven focus group discussions were conducted. Using disease scenarios, 4 examples of conditions amenable to neonatal screening were discussed in depth. All focus group discussions were audio taped and content analysed.

Results: Participants thought that the medical benefits of screening were very important for the child. Assuming the availability of effective early medical treatment, almost 100% would be willing to participate in a screening programme. If such treatment were absent, their potential willingness would be much lower.

Conclusions: The divergence in attitudes and preferences we found in this study reflected the complexity inherent in any consideration of screening for additional conditions. To implement such options successfully and to direct applied research in genomics, it is important to develop a better understanding of the thinking of target groups, namely parents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thalassaemia and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase screening in 13- to 14-year-old students of the Sardinian population: preliminary findings. Alpha-thalassaemia in association with beta-thalassaemia patients in Malaysia: a study on the co-inheritance of both disorders. Anxiety related to genetic testing for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and cystic fibrosis in COPD and/or bronchiectasis patients. Cytochrome p450 enzyme polymorphism frequency in indigenous and native american populations: a systematic review. Genetic heterogeneity in a susceptible region for essential hypertension among demographically different local populations in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1