欧洲基因测试:基于dna的测试遗传性疾病在欧洲。

Community genetics Pub Date : 2008-01-01 Epub Date: 2008-01-17 DOI:10.1159/000111984
Poupak Javaher, Helena Kaariainen, Ulf Kristoffersson, Irmgard Nippert, Jorge Sequeiros, Ron Zimmern, Jorg Schmidtke
{"title":"欧洲基因测试:基于dna的测试遗传性疾病在欧洲。","authors":"Poupak Javaher,&nbsp;Helena Kaariainen,&nbsp;Ulf Kristoffersson,&nbsp;Irmgard Nippert,&nbsp;Jorge Sequeiros,&nbsp;Ron Zimmern,&nbsp;Jorg Schmidtke","doi":"10.1159/000111984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Regarding the recent attention to develop policies regarding the provision of clinical genetic testing services, access to, acceptance, utilisation and regulation of genetic services was investigated in selected European countries as well as one non-European country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected on the basis of relevant international reports and sources accessible via the internet, from self- designed, internationally administered surveys and with the help of a panel of experts from European countries participating in several workshops as well as from National European Societies of Human Genetics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A selection of divergent health care systems was reviewed and compared (e.g. Finland, Germany, Portugal, Sweden, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Czech Republic, Lithuania and Serbia/Montenegro). For the evaluation of clinical validity and utility of genetic testing, background information was provided focussing on DNA-based testing for heritable disorders with a strong genetic component (usually due to the action of a single gene).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is great heterogeneity in genetic testing services among the countries surveyed. It is premature to mandate that genetic testing provided by clinical services meets professional standards regarding clinical validity and utility, because there is to date no consensus within the scientific community and among health care providers to what extent clinical validity and utility can and need to be assessed. Points to consider in the process of developing such standards are proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":80975,"journal":{"name":"Community genetics","volume":"11 2","pages":"75-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000111984","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EuroGentest: DNA-based testing for heritable disorders in Europe.\",\"authors\":\"Poupak Javaher,&nbsp;Helena Kaariainen,&nbsp;Ulf Kristoffersson,&nbsp;Irmgard Nippert,&nbsp;Jorge Sequeiros,&nbsp;Ron Zimmern,&nbsp;Jorg Schmidtke\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000111984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Regarding the recent attention to develop policies regarding the provision of clinical genetic testing services, access to, acceptance, utilisation and regulation of genetic services was investigated in selected European countries as well as one non-European country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected on the basis of relevant international reports and sources accessible via the internet, from self- designed, internationally administered surveys and with the help of a panel of experts from European countries participating in several workshops as well as from National European Societies of Human Genetics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A selection of divergent health care systems was reviewed and compared (e.g. Finland, Germany, Portugal, Sweden, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Czech Republic, Lithuania and Serbia/Montenegro). For the evaluation of clinical validity and utility of genetic testing, background information was provided focussing on DNA-based testing for heritable disorders with a strong genetic component (usually due to the action of a single gene).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is great heterogeneity in genetic testing services among the countries surveyed. It is premature to mandate that genetic testing provided by clinical services meets professional standards regarding clinical validity and utility, because there is to date no consensus within the scientific community and among health care providers to what extent clinical validity and utility can and need to be assessed. Points to consider in the process of developing such standards are proposed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community genetics\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"75-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000111984\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000111984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2008/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000111984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

目标:关于最近关注制定有关提供临床基因检测服务的政策,在选定的欧洲国家和一个非欧洲国家调查了遗传服务的获取、接受、利用和监管。方法:数据收集的基础是相关的国际报告和可通过互联网访问的资源,来自自我设计的,国际管理的调查,并在参加几个研讨会的欧洲国家专家小组以及欧洲国家人类遗传学学会的帮助下收集。结果:对一些不同的卫生保健系统进行了审查和比较(例如芬兰、德国、葡萄牙、瑞典、英国、法国、意大利、西班牙、捷克共和国、立陶宛和塞尔维亚/黑山)。为了评估基因检测的临床有效性和实用性,提供了背景信息,重点介绍了对具有强烈遗传成分(通常是由于单个基因的作用)的遗传性疾病进行基于dna的检测。结论:被调查国家间基因检测服务存在很大的异质性。强制要求临床服务机构提供的基因检测符合临床有效性和实用性方面的专业标准还为时过早,因为迄今为止科学界和卫生保健提供者之间还没有就临床有效性和实用性能够和需要评估到何种程度达成共识。提出了在制定这些标准过程中应考虑的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EuroGentest: DNA-based testing for heritable disorders in Europe.

Objectives: Regarding the recent attention to develop policies regarding the provision of clinical genetic testing services, access to, acceptance, utilisation and regulation of genetic services was investigated in selected European countries as well as one non-European country.

Methods: Data were collected on the basis of relevant international reports and sources accessible via the internet, from self- designed, internationally administered surveys and with the help of a panel of experts from European countries participating in several workshops as well as from National European Societies of Human Genetics.

Results: A selection of divergent health care systems was reviewed and compared (e.g. Finland, Germany, Portugal, Sweden, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Czech Republic, Lithuania and Serbia/Montenegro). For the evaluation of clinical validity and utility of genetic testing, background information was provided focussing on DNA-based testing for heritable disorders with a strong genetic component (usually due to the action of a single gene).

Conclusions: There is great heterogeneity in genetic testing services among the countries surveyed. It is premature to mandate that genetic testing provided by clinical services meets professional standards regarding clinical validity and utility, because there is to date no consensus within the scientific community and among health care providers to what extent clinical validity and utility can and need to be assessed. Points to consider in the process of developing such standards are proposed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thalassaemia and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase screening in 13- to 14-year-old students of the Sardinian population: preliminary findings. Alpha-thalassaemia in association with beta-thalassaemia patients in Malaysia: a study on the co-inheritance of both disorders. Anxiety related to genetic testing for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and cystic fibrosis in COPD and/or bronchiectasis patients. Cytochrome p450 enzyme polymorphism frequency in indigenous and native american populations: a systematic review. Genetic heterogeneity in a susceptible region for essential hypertension among demographically different local populations in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1