第一个患者项目:通过捐赠者解剖经验及其在专业中的作用参与病理学。

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Anatomical Sciences Education Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1002/ase.2341
Kyle A. Robertson, Jason M. Organ, Michael Yard, Jessica N. Byram
{"title":"第一个患者项目:通过捐赠者解剖经验及其在专业中的作用参与病理学。","authors":"Kyle A. Robertson,&nbsp;Jason M. Organ,&nbsp;Michael Yard,&nbsp;Jessica N. Byram","doi":"10.1002/ase.2341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The peer-reviewed anatomical education literature thoroughly describes the benefits and drawbacks of donor dissection. Gross anatomy laboratory environments utilizing donor dissection are generally considered to be a premier environment where students foster non-traditional discipline-independent skills (NTDIS), including the acquisition of professionalism, empathy, resilience, emotional intelligence, and situational awareness. Therefore, this IRB-approved study explored the impact of a formal humanism and pathology thread, the first patient project (FPP), on the personal and professional development of pre-professional undergraduate students in a gross anatomy dissection-based course. Five reflections from each student were collected across four cohorts (<i>n</i> = 74 students, 370 reflections). A post-course questionnaire collected data on student perceptions of the project. The framework method was used to analyze reflection and free response data and descriptive statistics were performed on Likert-style items using Excel. Three <i>themes</i> were identified to encompass the impacts of the FPP on professional development and include: <i>Socialization</i> (through collective dissection experience and pathology), <i>Humanistic Qualities</i> (respect for the donor and their history, and introspection), and <i>Content and Skills</i> (technical and NTDIS, anatomical knowledge). The end of course FPP survey was completed by 29 students across three cohorts (65%) and their perspectives were generally favorable regarding the promotion of respect, empathy, and humanization of their donors. This study underscores the value of incorporating humanism, pathology, and reflection, facilitated through formal curriculum for pre-professional undergraduate students. It provides evidence of the positive impact on their personal and professional development, supporting the integration of NTDIS in curricula across various disciplines.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"17 1","pages":"199-212"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ase.2341","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First patient project: Engaging pathology through the donor dissection experience and its role in professionalism\",\"authors\":\"Kyle A. Robertson,&nbsp;Jason M. Organ,&nbsp;Michael Yard,&nbsp;Jessica N. Byram\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ase.2341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The peer-reviewed anatomical education literature thoroughly describes the benefits and drawbacks of donor dissection. Gross anatomy laboratory environments utilizing donor dissection are generally considered to be a premier environment where students foster non-traditional discipline-independent skills (NTDIS), including the acquisition of professionalism, empathy, resilience, emotional intelligence, and situational awareness. Therefore, this IRB-approved study explored the impact of a formal humanism and pathology thread, the first patient project (FPP), on the personal and professional development of pre-professional undergraduate students in a gross anatomy dissection-based course. Five reflections from each student were collected across four cohorts (<i>n</i> = 74 students, 370 reflections). A post-course questionnaire collected data on student perceptions of the project. The framework method was used to analyze reflection and free response data and descriptive statistics were performed on Likert-style items using Excel. Three <i>themes</i> were identified to encompass the impacts of the FPP on professional development and include: <i>Socialization</i> (through collective dissection experience and pathology), <i>Humanistic Qualities</i> (respect for the donor and their history, and introspection), and <i>Content and Skills</i> (technical and NTDIS, anatomical knowledge). The end of course FPP survey was completed by 29 students across three cohorts (65%) and their perspectives were generally favorable regarding the promotion of respect, empathy, and humanization of their donors. This study underscores the value of incorporating humanism, pathology, and reflection, facilitated through formal curriculum for pre-professional undergraduate students. It provides evidence of the positive impact on their personal and professional development, supporting the integration of NTDIS in curricula across various disciplines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"199-212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ase.2341\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2341\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同行评审的解剖教育文献全面描述了供体解剖的优点和缺点。利用供体解剖的大体解剖实验室环境通常被认为是学生培养非传统学科独立技能(NTDIS)的首要环境,包括获得专业精神、同理心、韧性、情商和情境意识。因此,这项经IRB批准的研究探讨了正式的人文主义和病理学线索,即第一个患者项目(FPP),对专业前本科生在大体解剖基础课程中的个人和专业发展的影响。每个学生的五个思考被收集到四个队列中(n = 74名学生,370次反思)。一份课后问卷收集了学生对该项目看法的数据。框架法用于分析反思和自由反应数据,并使用Excel对Likert风格的项目进行描述性统计。确定了三个主题,涵盖FPP对专业发展的影响,包括:社会化(通过集体解剖经验和病理学)、人文素质(尊重捐赠者及其历史和内省)以及内容和技能(技术和NTDIS,解剖知识)。课程结束时FPP调查由三组29名学生(65%)完成,他们对促进捐赠者的尊重、同理心和人性化普遍持赞成态度。这项研究强调了将人文主义、病理学和反思相结合的价值,这是通过专业前本科生的正式课程来促进的。它提供了对他们的个人和专业发展产生积极影响的证据,支持将NTDIS纳入各个学科的课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
First patient project: Engaging pathology through the donor dissection experience and its role in professionalism

The peer-reviewed anatomical education literature thoroughly describes the benefits and drawbacks of donor dissection. Gross anatomy laboratory environments utilizing donor dissection are generally considered to be a premier environment where students foster non-traditional discipline-independent skills (NTDIS), including the acquisition of professionalism, empathy, resilience, emotional intelligence, and situational awareness. Therefore, this IRB-approved study explored the impact of a formal humanism and pathology thread, the first patient project (FPP), on the personal and professional development of pre-professional undergraduate students in a gross anatomy dissection-based course. Five reflections from each student were collected across four cohorts (n = 74 students, 370 reflections). A post-course questionnaire collected data on student perceptions of the project. The framework method was used to analyze reflection and free response data and descriptive statistics were performed on Likert-style items using Excel. Three themes were identified to encompass the impacts of the FPP on professional development and include: Socialization (through collective dissection experience and pathology), Humanistic Qualities (respect for the donor and their history, and introspection), and Content and Skills (technical and NTDIS, anatomical knowledge). The end of course FPP survey was completed by 29 students across three cohorts (65%) and their perspectives were generally favorable regarding the promotion of respect, empathy, and humanization of their donors. This study underscores the value of incorporating humanism, pathology, and reflection, facilitated through formal curriculum for pre-professional undergraduate students. It provides evidence of the positive impact on their personal and professional development, supporting the integration of NTDIS in curricula across various disciplines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
期刊最新文献
Refocusing graduate gross anatomy training: Curating future content experts. Anatomical Sciences Education Vol. 17, Issue 8, 2024 Cover Image Editorial Board and Table of Contents Comparing assisting technologies for proficiency in cardiac morphology: 3D printing and mixed reality versus CT slice images for morphological understanding of congenital heart defects by medical students. Effect of peer facilitation in anatomy small group curriculum on academic performance and retention: A pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1