补偿性健康动机和行为量表:开发、评估、心理测量特性和初步验证。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Appetite Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2023.107075
Kalista Sedemedes , Bärbel Knäuper , Gentiana Sadikaj , Trista Yue Yuan , Carsten Wrosch , Sylvia Santosa , Angela S. Alberga , Lisa Kakinami
{"title":"补偿性健康动机和行为量表:开发、评估、心理测量特性和初步验证。","authors":"Kalista Sedemedes ,&nbsp;Bärbel Knäuper ,&nbsp;Gentiana Sadikaj ,&nbsp;Trista Yue Yuan ,&nbsp;Carsten Wrosch ,&nbsp;Sylvia Santosa ,&nbsp;Angela S. Alberga ,&nbsp;Lisa Kakinami","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2023.107075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The “Compensatory Health Beliefs” scale assesses the degree to which one believes that unhealthy behaviours can be compensated through healthier ones. However, no validated scale to assess compensatory weight-related behaviors exists. The study's objective was to develop (Study 1) and validate (Study 2) a questionnaire measuring compensatory health motivations and behaviors (CHMB) and to assess their associations with body mass index (BMI) and psychological weight-related measures. An initial 34-item measure was constructed based on a target sample's (Study 1, n = 158) suggestions and refined based on expert feedback. The measure was then tested in a representative Canadian adult sample (<em>N</em> = 1400, 48.7% male). The sample was stratified by sex and age and then randomly split into two (<em>N</em> = 701 for exploratory factor analysis; <em>N</em> = 699 for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) cross-validation). Fit indices, standardized Cronbach's alphas and the associations between the CHMB model with cognitive restraint, weight concerns, and BMI were assessed in multiple linear regression models controlling for age and sex. The final CHMB model (n = 17 items) consisted of four subscales: (1) motivation, (2) use on special occasions, (3) general use, (4) compensatory health beliefs. Fit indices (Goodness of Fit Index = 0.922) and Cronbach's alphas were good (<em>α</em> = 0.88). In multiple linear regression models, all CHMB subscales were associated with greater cognitive restraint in eating. Compensatory behavior use on special occasions was associated with greater weight concern (B = 0.12, <em>p</em> &lt; .0001), while general compensatory behavior use was associated with lower weight concern (B = −0.07, <em>p</em> &lt; .05). None of the subscales were associated with BMI. The validated CHMB scale allows for the assessment of compensatory health motivations and behaviors in a Canadian population. Research on whether this scale can predict weight changes and general health is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 107075"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666323025370/pdfft?md5=ff598a609158e8656036de3e300e7710&pid=1-s2.0-S0195666323025370-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compensatory health motivations and behaviors scale: Development, evaluation, psychometric properties and a preliminary validation\",\"authors\":\"Kalista Sedemedes ,&nbsp;Bärbel Knäuper ,&nbsp;Gentiana Sadikaj ,&nbsp;Trista Yue Yuan ,&nbsp;Carsten Wrosch ,&nbsp;Sylvia Santosa ,&nbsp;Angela S. Alberga ,&nbsp;Lisa Kakinami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2023.107075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The “Compensatory Health Beliefs” scale assesses the degree to which one believes that unhealthy behaviours can be compensated through healthier ones. However, no validated scale to assess compensatory weight-related behaviors exists. The study's objective was to develop (Study 1) and validate (Study 2) a questionnaire measuring compensatory health motivations and behaviors (CHMB) and to assess their associations with body mass index (BMI) and psychological weight-related measures. An initial 34-item measure was constructed based on a target sample's (Study 1, n = 158) suggestions and refined based on expert feedback. The measure was then tested in a representative Canadian adult sample (<em>N</em> = 1400, 48.7% male). The sample was stratified by sex and age and then randomly split into two (<em>N</em> = 701 for exploratory factor analysis; <em>N</em> = 699 for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) cross-validation). Fit indices, standardized Cronbach's alphas and the associations between the CHMB model with cognitive restraint, weight concerns, and BMI were assessed in multiple linear regression models controlling for age and sex. The final CHMB model (n = 17 items) consisted of four subscales: (1) motivation, (2) use on special occasions, (3) general use, (4) compensatory health beliefs. Fit indices (Goodness of Fit Index = 0.922) and Cronbach's alphas were good (<em>α</em> = 0.88). In multiple linear regression models, all CHMB subscales were associated with greater cognitive restraint in eating. Compensatory behavior use on special occasions was associated with greater weight concern (B = 0.12, <em>p</em> &lt; .0001), while general compensatory behavior use was associated with lower weight concern (B = −0.07, <em>p</em> &lt; .05). None of the subscales were associated with BMI. The validated CHMB scale allows for the assessment of compensatory health motivations and behaviors in a Canadian population. Research on whether this scale can predict weight changes and general health is needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107075\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666323025370/pdfft?md5=ff598a609158e8656036de3e300e7710&pid=1-s2.0-S0195666323025370-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666323025370\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666323025370","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“补偿性健康信念”量表评估了人们认为不健康行为可以通过更健康的行为得到补偿的程度。然而,目前还没有经过验证的量表来评估补偿性体重相关行为。该研究的目的是开发(研究1)和验证(研究2)一份测量补偿性健康动机和行为(CHMB)的问卷,并评估其与体重指数(BMI)和心理体重相关指标的关系。最初的34项测量是基于目标样本构建的(研究1,n = 158)建议,并根据专家反馈进行改进。然后在具有代表性的加拿大成人样本(N = 1400,48.7%为男性)。样本按性别和年龄分层,然后随机分为两组(N = 701,用于探索性因素分析;N = 699用于验证性因素分析(CFA)交叉验证)。在控制年龄和性别的多元线性回归模型中评估拟合指数、标准化Cronbachα以及CHMB模型与认知约束、体重问题和BMI之间的关联。最终CHMB模型(n = 17个项目)由四个分量表组成:(1)动机,(2)在特殊场合使用,(3)一般使用,(4)补偿健康信念。拟合指数(拟合优度指数 = 0.922)和Cronbachα = 0.88)。在多元线性回归模型中,所有CHMB分量表都与饮食中更大的认知抑制有关。在特殊场合使用补偿行为与更大的体重问题有关(B = 0.12,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Compensatory health motivations and behaviors scale: Development, evaluation, psychometric properties and a preliminary validation

The “Compensatory Health Beliefs” scale assesses the degree to which one believes that unhealthy behaviours can be compensated through healthier ones. However, no validated scale to assess compensatory weight-related behaviors exists. The study's objective was to develop (Study 1) and validate (Study 2) a questionnaire measuring compensatory health motivations and behaviors (CHMB) and to assess their associations with body mass index (BMI) and psychological weight-related measures. An initial 34-item measure was constructed based on a target sample's (Study 1, n = 158) suggestions and refined based on expert feedback. The measure was then tested in a representative Canadian adult sample (N = 1400, 48.7% male). The sample was stratified by sex and age and then randomly split into two (N = 701 for exploratory factor analysis; N = 699 for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) cross-validation). Fit indices, standardized Cronbach's alphas and the associations between the CHMB model with cognitive restraint, weight concerns, and BMI were assessed in multiple linear regression models controlling for age and sex. The final CHMB model (n = 17 items) consisted of four subscales: (1) motivation, (2) use on special occasions, (3) general use, (4) compensatory health beliefs. Fit indices (Goodness of Fit Index = 0.922) and Cronbach's alphas were good (α = 0.88). In multiple linear regression models, all CHMB subscales were associated with greater cognitive restraint in eating. Compensatory behavior use on special occasions was associated with greater weight concern (B = 0.12, p < .0001), while general compensatory behavior use was associated with lower weight concern (B = −0.07, p < .05). None of the subscales were associated with BMI. The validated CHMB scale allows for the assessment of compensatory health motivations and behaviors in a Canadian population. Research on whether this scale can predict weight changes and general health is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Does Rejection of Inequality Encourage Green Consumption? The Effect of Power Distance Belief on Organic Food Consumption. "Flavor, fun, and vitamins"? Consumers' Lay Beliefs About Child-Oriented Food Products. Association of Maternal Immigration Status with Emotional Eating in Taiwanese Children: The Mediating Roles of Health Literacy and Feeding Practices. Weight Discrimination as a Predictor of Stress and Eating: The Role of Identifying as "Fat". Food rejection is associated with tactile sensitivity and tactile appreciation in three-year-old children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1