Randox比色法测定血清铜和锌的验证。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1177/00045632231208337
Simon A Handley, Troy Wanandy, Louise Prentice
{"title":"Randox比色法测定血清铜和锌的验证。","authors":"Simon A Handley, Troy Wanandy, Louise Prentice","doi":"10.1177/00045632231208337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serum copper and zinc are measured to assess deficiency and toxicity. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry and mass spectrometry methods are expensive and require highly trained staff. Colorimetric assays are available from Randox which are inexpensive and can be automated. We validated serum copper and zinc colorimetric assays on the Binding Site Optilite analyser including comparison with flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accuracy, imprecision, lower limit of quantitation, and linearity were ascertained. The impact of triglycerides, bilirubin, nickel, and iron on assay performance was also investigated. Comparison of results from colorimetric analysis of patient and external quality assurance samples with those obtained by FAAS and ICP-MS was undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-, and inter-assay imprecision was <9%. Serum copper and zinc assays were linear between 1.8-35.6 and 2.3-45.7 µmol/L, respectively. Agreement was good between colorimetry and FAAS (intercept = -0.7, slope = 1.04) and ICP-MS (intercept = 0.6, slope = 0.99) for serum copper in patients' samples. For serum zinc, agreement was poor between colorimetry and FAAS (intercept = 2.2, slope = 0.87) and ICP-MS (intercept = 1.9, slope = 0.98) in patients' samples. There was a poor concordance in assessment of hypozincaemia between colorimetry and FAAS/ICP-MS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Randox colorimetric assay for serum copper on the Optilite is simple to perform, has a short analysis time, and measured concentrations compare well with FAAS and ICP-MS. Due to poor agreement with FAAS and ICP-MS, colorimetry is not suitable for the measurement of serum zinc.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"182-194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Randox colorimetric assays for serum copper and zinc.\",\"authors\":\"Simon A Handley, Troy Wanandy, Louise Prentice\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632231208337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serum copper and zinc are measured to assess deficiency and toxicity. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry and mass spectrometry methods are expensive and require highly trained staff. Colorimetric assays are available from Randox which are inexpensive and can be automated. We validated serum copper and zinc colorimetric assays on the Binding Site Optilite analyser including comparison with flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accuracy, imprecision, lower limit of quantitation, and linearity were ascertained. The impact of triglycerides, bilirubin, nickel, and iron on assay performance was also investigated. Comparison of results from colorimetric analysis of patient and external quality assurance samples with those obtained by FAAS and ICP-MS was undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-, and inter-assay imprecision was <9%. Serum copper and zinc assays were linear between 1.8-35.6 and 2.3-45.7 µmol/L, respectively. Agreement was good between colorimetry and FAAS (intercept = -0.7, slope = 1.04) and ICP-MS (intercept = 0.6, slope = 0.99) for serum copper in patients' samples. For serum zinc, agreement was poor between colorimetry and FAAS (intercept = 2.2, slope = 0.87) and ICP-MS (intercept = 1.9, slope = 0.98) in patients' samples. There was a poor concordance in assessment of hypozincaemia between colorimetry and FAAS/ICP-MS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Randox colorimetric assay for serum copper on the Optilite is simple to perform, has a short analysis time, and measured concentrations compare well with FAAS and ICP-MS. Due to poor agreement with FAAS and ICP-MS, colorimetry is not suitable for the measurement of serum zinc.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"182-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632231208337\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632231208337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景测定血清铜和锌以评估其缺乏和毒性。原子吸收分光光度法和质谱法成本高昂,需要训练有素的工作人员。Randox提供的比色测定法价格低廉,可实现自动化。我们在结合位点Optilite分析仪上验证了血清铜和锌的比色测定,包括与火焰原子吸收光谱法(FAAS)和电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)的比较。方法测定其准确度、不精密度、定量下限和线性。还研究了甘油三酯、胆红素、镍和铁对测定性能的影响。对患者和外部质量保证样品的比色分析结果与FAAS和ICP-MS获得的结果进行了比较。结果批内和批间的不精确性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the Randox colorimetric assays for serum copper and zinc.

Background: Serum copper and zinc are measured to assess deficiency and toxicity. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry and mass spectrometry methods are expensive and require highly trained staff. Colorimetric assays are available from Randox which are inexpensive and can be automated. We validated serum copper and zinc colorimetric assays on the Binding Site Optilite analyser including comparison with flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

Methods: Accuracy, imprecision, lower limit of quantitation, and linearity were ascertained. The impact of triglycerides, bilirubin, nickel, and iron on assay performance was also investigated. Comparison of results from colorimetric analysis of patient and external quality assurance samples with those obtained by FAAS and ICP-MS was undertaken.

Results: Intra-, and inter-assay imprecision was <9%. Serum copper and zinc assays were linear between 1.8-35.6 and 2.3-45.7 µmol/L, respectively. Agreement was good between colorimetry and FAAS (intercept = -0.7, slope = 1.04) and ICP-MS (intercept = 0.6, slope = 0.99) for serum copper in patients' samples. For serum zinc, agreement was poor between colorimetry and FAAS (intercept = 2.2, slope = 0.87) and ICP-MS (intercept = 1.9, slope = 0.98) in patients' samples. There was a poor concordance in assessment of hypozincaemia between colorimetry and FAAS/ICP-MS.

Conclusion: The Randox colorimetric assay for serum copper on the Optilite is simple to perform, has a short analysis time, and measured concentrations compare well with FAAS and ICP-MS. Due to poor agreement with FAAS and ICP-MS, colorimetry is not suitable for the measurement of serum zinc.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).
期刊最新文献
Coefficients of variation analyses of internal quality control status for blood lead in China from 2015 to 2023. The effects of controlled acute psychological stress on serum cortisol and plasma metanephrine concentrations in healthy subjects. Suggested guide to using lactate gap as a surrogate marker in the diagnosis of ethylene glycol overdose. Simultaneous quantification of serum symmetric dimethylarginine, asymmetric dimethylarginine and creatinine for use in a routine clinical laboratory. Usefulness of the 3-hydroxykynurenine/kynurenic acid ratio as a diagnostic biomarker for diffuse larger B-cell lymphoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1