{"title":"Dupilumab治疗嗜酸性粒细胞慢性鼻窦炎的长期疗效。","authors":"Yasuhiro Tsunemi, Tsuguhisa Nakayama, Takashi Kashiwagi, Makoto Akutsu, Shota Saito, Shinichi Haruna","doi":"10.1177/19458924231204128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (eCRS) is a type 2 inflammatory disease that frequently recurs after surgery. In recent years, dupilumab has been available for the treatment of refractory chronic rhinosinusitis since 2020 in Japan. Although there are some reports of its usefulness, there are not enough reports of its clinical efficacy for longer than 1 year, especially for olfactory recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with eCRS who had recurrence after surgery and had been receiving dupilumab were enrolled retrospectively. The nasal polyp score (NPS), computed tomography (CT) score, T&T olfactometer, and olfactory cleft opacification on CT were evaluated at baseline, at an average of 5.1 months later (short term), and at an average of 18.3 months later (long term).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the short-term evaluation, there were significant improvements in the NPS and CT scores (<i>P</i> < .001, <i>P</i> = .008, respectively). The CT score was further improved at the long-term evaluation compared to the short-term evaluation (<i>P</i> = .018) and baseline (<i>P</i> = .008). T&T detection/recognition thresholds and olfactory cleft opacification showed significant improvements only at the long-term evaluation compared to baseline (<i>P</i> = .002, <i>P</i> = .006, and, <i>P</i> = .006, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NPS remained improved, and the CT score showed further improvement with long-term treatment, whereas olfactory function and olfactory cleft opacification showed significant improvement only after long-term treatment. There was a dissociation between the time to improve in the NPS and CT scores and the time to improve in olfactory function and olfactory cleft opacification. Based on these results, dupilumab should be administered for longer than 1 year, especially for olfactory function.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":" ","pages":"14-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Efficacy of Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis.\",\"authors\":\"Yasuhiro Tsunemi, Tsuguhisa Nakayama, Takashi Kashiwagi, Makoto Akutsu, Shota Saito, Shinichi Haruna\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19458924231204128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (eCRS) is a type 2 inflammatory disease that frequently recurs after surgery. In recent years, dupilumab has been available for the treatment of refractory chronic rhinosinusitis since 2020 in Japan. Although there are some reports of its usefulness, there are not enough reports of its clinical efficacy for longer than 1 year, especially for olfactory recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with eCRS who had recurrence after surgery and had been receiving dupilumab were enrolled retrospectively. The nasal polyp score (NPS), computed tomography (CT) score, T&T olfactometer, and olfactory cleft opacification on CT were evaluated at baseline, at an average of 5.1 months later (short term), and at an average of 18.3 months later (long term).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the short-term evaluation, there were significant improvements in the NPS and CT scores (<i>P</i> < .001, <i>P</i> = .008, respectively). The CT score was further improved at the long-term evaluation compared to the short-term evaluation (<i>P</i> = .018) and baseline (<i>P</i> = .008). T&T detection/recognition thresholds and olfactory cleft opacification showed significant improvements only at the long-term evaluation compared to baseline (<i>P</i> = .002, <i>P</i> = .006, and, <i>P</i> = .006, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NPS remained improved, and the CT score showed further improvement with long-term treatment, whereas olfactory function and olfactory cleft opacification showed significant improvement only after long-term treatment. There was a dissociation between the time to improve in the NPS and CT scores and the time to improve in olfactory function and olfactory cleft opacification. Based on these results, dupilumab should be administered for longer than 1 year, especially for olfactory function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"14-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924231204128\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924231204128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-Term Efficacy of Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis.
Background: Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (eCRS) is a type 2 inflammatory disease that frequently recurs after surgery. In recent years, dupilumab has been available for the treatment of refractory chronic rhinosinusitis since 2020 in Japan. Although there are some reports of its usefulness, there are not enough reports of its clinical efficacy for longer than 1 year, especially for olfactory recovery.
Methods: Twenty patients with eCRS who had recurrence after surgery and had been receiving dupilumab were enrolled retrospectively. The nasal polyp score (NPS), computed tomography (CT) score, T&T olfactometer, and olfactory cleft opacification on CT were evaluated at baseline, at an average of 5.1 months later (short term), and at an average of 18.3 months later (long term).
Results: At the short-term evaluation, there were significant improvements in the NPS and CT scores (P < .001, P = .008, respectively). The CT score was further improved at the long-term evaluation compared to the short-term evaluation (P = .018) and baseline (P = .008). T&T detection/recognition thresholds and olfactory cleft opacification showed significant improvements only at the long-term evaluation compared to baseline (P = .002, P = .006, and, P = .006, respectively).
Conclusion: The NPS remained improved, and the CT score showed further improvement with long-term treatment, whereas olfactory function and olfactory cleft opacification showed significant improvement only after long-term treatment. There was a dissociation between the time to improve in the NPS and CT scores and the time to improve in olfactory function and olfactory cleft opacification. Based on these results, dupilumab should be administered for longer than 1 year, especially for olfactory function.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.