Llubitza Slaviza Banic Vidal, Nikolina Nika Veček, Ivan Šalinović, Ivana Miletić, Eva Klarić, Silvana Jukić Krmek
{"title":"离子释放牙科材料中氟化物的短期释放。","authors":"Llubitza Slaviza Banic Vidal, Nikolina Nika Veček, Ivan Šalinović, Ivana Miletić, Eva Klarić, Silvana Jukić Krmek","doi":"10.15644/asc57/3/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare short-term release of fluoride ions from ion-releasing dental restorative materials.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Seven experimental groups were prepared using the following six different materials: alkasite (Cention Forte), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC), bioactive composite (ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE), fluoride-containing nano-hybrid composite (Luminos UN), coat-free glass hybrid (EQUIA Forte HT), coat-applied glass hybrid (EQUIA Forte HT), and glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). A total of 40 samples for each group (n=40) were prepared in Teflon molds (8 mm x 2 mm) and placed in polyethylene vials with 5 ml of deionized water. Fluoride release was measured after 6, 24, 48 hours, and for 5 weeks using an ion-selective electrode. The results were expressed in mg/l and the data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in fluoride release were observed within the first 6 hours (ANOVA p<0.001). EQUIA Forte HT had the highest release, while the other materials showed no significant differences. After 24 hours, EQUIA Forte HT (p<0.001) and Luminos UN (p<0.05) exhibited significantly higher releases, compared to other tested materials. EQUIA Forte HT maintained the highest release at 48 hours (p<0.001), followed by Cention Forte (p<0.05) and Luminos UN (p<0.05). All material pairs showed significant differences in fluoride release at 5 weeks (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coat-free EQUIA Forte HT had the overall highest fluoride release, while Cention Forte demonstrated the greatest increase over time. ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE exhibited the lowest fluoride release in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7154,"journal":{"name":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/16/ASC_57(3)_229-237.PMC10557113.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-Term Fluoride Release from Ion- Releasing Dental Materials.\",\"authors\":\"Llubitza Slaviza Banic Vidal, Nikolina Nika Veček, Ivan Šalinović, Ivana Miletić, Eva Klarić, Silvana Jukić Krmek\",\"doi\":\"10.15644/asc57/3/3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare short-term release of fluoride ions from ion-releasing dental restorative materials.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Seven experimental groups were prepared using the following six different materials: alkasite (Cention Forte), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC), bioactive composite (ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE), fluoride-containing nano-hybrid composite (Luminos UN), coat-free glass hybrid (EQUIA Forte HT), coat-applied glass hybrid (EQUIA Forte HT), and glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). A total of 40 samples for each group (n=40) were prepared in Teflon molds (8 mm x 2 mm) and placed in polyethylene vials with 5 ml of deionized water. Fluoride release was measured after 6, 24, 48 hours, and for 5 weeks using an ion-selective electrode. The results were expressed in mg/l and the data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in fluoride release were observed within the first 6 hours (ANOVA p<0.001). EQUIA Forte HT had the highest release, while the other materials showed no significant differences. After 24 hours, EQUIA Forte HT (p<0.001) and Luminos UN (p<0.05) exhibited significantly higher releases, compared to other tested materials. EQUIA Forte HT maintained the highest release at 48 hours (p<0.001), followed by Cention Forte (p<0.05) and Luminos UN (p<0.05). All material pairs showed significant differences in fluoride release at 5 weeks (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coat-free EQUIA Forte HT had the overall highest fluoride release, while Cention Forte demonstrated the greatest increase over time. ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE exhibited the lowest fluoride release in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Stomatologica Croatica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/16/ASC_57(3)_229-237.PMC10557113.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Stomatologica Croatica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15644/asc57/3/3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15644/asc57/3/3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较离子释放型口腔修复材料中氟离子的短期释放。材料和方法:使用以下六种不同的材料制备了七个实验组:链烷酸盐(Cention Forte)、树脂改性玻璃离聚物水泥(Fuji II LC)、生物活性复合材料(ACTIVA bioactive RESTORATIVE)、含氟纳米杂化复合材料(Luminos UN)、无涂层玻璃杂化材料(EQUIA Forte HT)、涂层应用玻璃杂化材料,和玻璃离聚物水泥(Fuji IX)。每组共有40个样品(n=40)在聚四氟乙烯模具(8 mm x 2 mm)中制备,并放入装有5 ml去离子水的聚乙烯小瓶中。使用离子选择电极在6、24、48小时和5周后测量氟化物的释放。结果以mg/l表示,并使用ANOVA对数据进行统计分析。结果:在前6小时内观察到氟化物释放的显著差异(ANOVA P结论:无涂层EQUIA Forte HT的氟化物释放总体最高,而Cention Forte的氟化物释放随时间的推移增加最大。ACTIVA BioACTIVE RESTORATIVE在本研究中的氟化物释放最低。
Short-Term Fluoride Release from Ion- Releasing Dental Materials.
Objective: To compare short-term release of fluoride ions from ion-releasing dental restorative materials.
Material and methods: Seven experimental groups were prepared using the following six different materials: alkasite (Cention Forte), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC), bioactive composite (ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE), fluoride-containing nano-hybrid composite (Luminos UN), coat-free glass hybrid (EQUIA Forte HT), coat-applied glass hybrid (EQUIA Forte HT), and glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). A total of 40 samples for each group (n=40) were prepared in Teflon molds (8 mm x 2 mm) and placed in polyethylene vials with 5 ml of deionized water. Fluoride release was measured after 6, 24, 48 hours, and for 5 weeks using an ion-selective electrode. The results were expressed in mg/l and the data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA.
Results: Significant differences in fluoride release were observed within the first 6 hours (ANOVA p<0.001). EQUIA Forte HT had the highest release, while the other materials showed no significant differences. After 24 hours, EQUIA Forte HT (p<0.001) and Luminos UN (p<0.05) exhibited significantly higher releases, compared to other tested materials. EQUIA Forte HT maintained the highest release at 48 hours (p<0.001), followed by Cention Forte (p<0.05) and Luminos UN (p<0.05). All material pairs showed significant differences in fluoride release at 5 weeks (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Coat-free EQUIA Forte HT had the overall highest fluoride release, while Cention Forte demonstrated the greatest increase over time. ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE exhibited the lowest fluoride release in this study.
期刊介绍:
The Acta Stomatologica Croatica (ASCRO) is a leading scientific non-profit journal in the field of dental, oral and cranio-facial sciences during the past 44 years in Croatia. ASCRO publishes original scientific and clinical papers, preliminary communications, case reports, book reviews, letters to the editor and news. Review articles are published by invitation from the Editor-in-Chief by acclaimed professionals in distinct fields of dental medicine. All manuscripts are subjected to peer review process.