移植旅游业——错失良机。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1097/MOT.0000000000001108
Hadar Merhav
{"title":"移植旅游业——错失良机。","authors":"Hadar Merhav","doi":"10.1097/MOT.0000000000001108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To explore the resurgence of transplant tourism (TT) despite the recent reiteration of the Declaration of Istanbul (DoI) in 2018. As demand grows exponentially and supply remains static, novel approaches to bridging the gap should be explored.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>TT is estimated to comprise up to 10% of transplants worldwide. Prosecuting patients seeking organs through TT has been unsuccessful. Extra jurisdictional prosecution of brokers, vendors and institutions participating in illicit TT has been difficult. Resurgence of TT has occurred in both \"traditional\" and new countries. The public attitude towards TT and paid donation is largely positive. The Iranian experience with state regulated paid donors merits attention and perhaps emulation. Numerous philosophers, ethicists and transplant professionals find it acceptable to promote financial consideration for organ donors.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Acknowledging the autonomy of persons, including poor and vulnerable ones, to receive financial consideration for their sacrifice should not be considered morally reprehensible. Strict international regulation, oversight and legislation should be implemented to assure adequate compensation, donor wellbeing, elimination of brokers and excellent medical care. Implementing such a system internationally may eliminate kidney waiting lists, provide great benefits to vendors, improve transplant facilities in developing countries and provide substantial savings to insurers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10900,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"457-462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transplant tourism - a missed opportunity.\",\"authors\":\"Hadar Merhav\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOT.0000000000001108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To explore the resurgence of transplant tourism (TT) despite the recent reiteration of the Declaration of Istanbul (DoI) in 2018. As demand grows exponentially and supply remains static, novel approaches to bridging the gap should be explored.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>TT is estimated to comprise up to 10% of transplants worldwide. Prosecuting patients seeking organs through TT has been unsuccessful. Extra jurisdictional prosecution of brokers, vendors and institutions participating in illicit TT has been difficult. Resurgence of TT has occurred in both \\\"traditional\\\" and new countries. The public attitude towards TT and paid donation is largely positive. The Iranian experience with state regulated paid donors merits attention and perhaps emulation. Numerous philosophers, ethicists and transplant professionals find it acceptable to promote financial consideration for organ donors.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Acknowledging the autonomy of persons, including poor and vulnerable ones, to receive financial consideration for their sacrifice should not be considered morally reprehensible. Strict international regulation, oversight and legislation should be implemented to assure adequate compensation, donor wellbeing, elimination of brokers and excellent medical care. Implementing such a system internationally may eliminate kidney waiting lists, provide great benefits to vendors, improve transplant facilities in developing countries and provide substantial savings to insurers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"457-462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查目的:探讨尽管最近在2018年重申了《伊斯坦布尔宣言》,但移植旅游业(TT)的复苏。随着需求呈指数级增长,供应保持不变,应该探索弥合差距的新方法。最近的发现:TT估计占全世界移植的10%。起诉通过TT寻求器官的患者一直没有成功。对参与非法转让的经纪人、供应商和机构进行法外起诉一直很困难。TT的复兴既发生在“传统”国家,也发生在新国家。公众对TT和有偿捐赠的态度基本上是积极的。伊朗与受国家监管的有偿捐赠者的经验值得关注,或许也值得效仿。许多哲学家、伦理学家和移植专业人士认为,促进器官捐献者的经济考虑是可以接受的。摘要:承认包括穷人和弱势群体在内的人因其牺牲而获得经济补偿的自主权不应被视为道德上应受谴责。应实施严格的国际监管、监督和立法,以确保足够的赔偿、捐赠者的福祉、消除经纪人和良好的医疗服务。在国际上实施这样一个系统可以消除肾脏等待名单,为供应商提供巨大的好处,改善发展中国家的移植设施,并为保险公司节省大量费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transplant tourism - a missed opportunity.

Purpose of review: To explore the resurgence of transplant tourism (TT) despite the recent reiteration of the Declaration of Istanbul (DoI) in 2018. As demand grows exponentially and supply remains static, novel approaches to bridging the gap should be explored.

Recent findings: TT is estimated to comprise up to 10% of transplants worldwide. Prosecuting patients seeking organs through TT has been unsuccessful. Extra jurisdictional prosecution of brokers, vendors and institutions participating in illicit TT has been difficult. Resurgence of TT has occurred in both "traditional" and new countries. The public attitude towards TT and paid donation is largely positive. The Iranian experience with state regulated paid donors merits attention and perhaps emulation. Numerous philosophers, ethicists and transplant professionals find it acceptable to promote financial consideration for organ donors.

Summary: Acknowledging the autonomy of persons, including poor and vulnerable ones, to receive financial consideration for their sacrifice should not be considered morally reprehensible. Strict international regulation, oversight and legislation should be implemented to assure adequate compensation, donor wellbeing, elimination of brokers and excellent medical care. Implementing such a system internationally may eliminate kidney waiting lists, provide great benefits to vendors, improve transplant facilities in developing countries and provide substantial savings to insurers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation is an indispensable resource featuring key, up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. Led by renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation delivers a fresh insight into topics such as stem cell transplantation, immunosuppression, tolerance induction and organ preservation and procurement. With 18 sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, surgeons and other healthcare professionals alike.
期刊最新文献
Ethical considerations in lung re-transplantation. Ethics of abortion in transplantation. Establishing an upper extremity transplantation program: lessons learnt over 12 years. The current state of tolerance induction in vascularized composite allotransplantation. Tracheal transplantation: lessons learned that may apply to lung transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1