腰方前导管用于选择性剖宫产:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1111/aas.14335
Christian K Hansen, Gudny E Steingrimsdottir, Mette Dam, Martin V Nielsen, Katrine Tanggaard, Troels D Poulsen, Morten Lebech, Jens Børglum
{"title":"腰方前导管用于选择性剖宫产:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Christian K Hansen, Gudny E Steingrimsdottir, Mette Dam, Martin V Nielsen, Katrine Tanggaard, Troels D Poulsen, Morten Lebech, Jens Børglum","doi":"10.1111/aas.14335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimizing pain management following cesarean section is crucial for the well-being of both mother and infant. Various types of quadratus lumborum blocks have exhibited reduced opioid consumption and pain scores after cesarean section. However, duration of block effect is relatively short. The aim of this study was to investigate the analgesic efficacy of the anterior quadratus lumborum catheters for cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All 32 enrolled participants were allocated to postoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided anterior quadratus lumborum catheter placement with injection of 60 mL ropivacaine 0.375% after cesarean section. Randomization at 2 h resulted in either 60 mL ropivacaine 0.2% or 60 mL isotonic saline injected through the catheters, with subsequent 22-h infusion of either ropivacaine 0.2% or isotonic saline with an infusion rate of 4 mL h<sup>-1</sup> per catheter. Participants in the active group received a total of 697 mg ropivacaine during the first 24 h. All participants received the standard postoperative multimodal pain regimen, and a final bilateral injection at 24-h post-catheter placement of 60 mL ropivacaine 0.375% in total. The primary outcome was time to first opioid administration. Secondary outcomes were pain scores, time to first ambulation, nausea and vomiting, accumulated opioid consumption, and catheter displacement rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant intergroup differences were observed following the randomized intervention. Median time to first opioid (IQR) was (active vs. placebo) 414 (283, 597) vs. 428 (245, 552) minutes, with a median difference (CI) of -14 (-184 to 262) min, p = .32.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bilateral anterior quadratus lumborum catheters with continuous infusion did not prolong time to first opioid after elective cesarean section.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"254-262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anterior quadratus lumborum catheters for elective cesarean section: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Christian K Hansen, Gudny E Steingrimsdottir, Mette Dam, Martin V Nielsen, Katrine Tanggaard, Troels D Poulsen, Morten Lebech, Jens Børglum\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aas.14335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimizing pain management following cesarean section is crucial for the well-being of both mother and infant. Various types of quadratus lumborum blocks have exhibited reduced opioid consumption and pain scores after cesarean section. However, duration of block effect is relatively short. The aim of this study was to investigate the analgesic efficacy of the anterior quadratus lumborum catheters for cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All 32 enrolled participants were allocated to postoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided anterior quadratus lumborum catheter placement with injection of 60 mL ropivacaine 0.375% after cesarean section. Randomization at 2 h resulted in either 60 mL ropivacaine 0.2% or 60 mL isotonic saline injected through the catheters, with subsequent 22-h infusion of either ropivacaine 0.2% or isotonic saline with an infusion rate of 4 mL h<sup>-1</sup> per catheter. Participants in the active group received a total of 697 mg ropivacaine during the first 24 h. All participants received the standard postoperative multimodal pain regimen, and a final bilateral injection at 24-h post-catheter placement of 60 mL ropivacaine 0.375% in total. The primary outcome was time to first opioid administration. Secondary outcomes were pain scores, time to first ambulation, nausea and vomiting, accumulated opioid consumption, and catheter displacement rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant intergroup differences were observed following the randomized intervention. Median time to first opioid (IQR) was (active vs. placebo) 414 (283, 597) vs. 428 (245, 552) minutes, with a median difference (CI) of -14 (-184 to 262) min, p = .32.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bilateral anterior quadratus lumborum catheters with continuous infusion did not prolong time to first opioid after elective cesarean section.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"254-262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14335\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:优化剖宫产术后的疼痛管理对母亲和婴儿的健康都至关重要。各种类型的腰方肌阻滞在剖宫产后表现出阿片类药物消耗和疼痛评分降低。但阻滞效应的持续时间相对较短。本研究旨在探讨腰方前导管用于剖宫产的镇痛效果。方法:所有32名入选的参与者被分配到术后双侧超声引导下放置腰方前导管,注射60 mL罗哌卡因0.375%剖宫产术后。2时随机化 h导致60 mL罗哌卡因0.2%或60 通过导管注射mL等渗盐水,随后22小时输注0.2%的罗哌卡因或输注率为4的等渗盐水 mL h-1根导管。活跃组的参与者共收到697份 mg罗哌卡因 h.所有参与者接受标准的术后多模式疼痛方案,并在导管放置后24小时进行最后一次双侧注射60 mL罗哌卡因,总量0.375%。主要结果是首次给药阿片类药物的时间。次要结果是疼痛评分、首次行走时间、恶心和呕吐、累积阿片类药物消耗量和导管移位率。结果:随机干预后未观察到显著的组间差异。首次服用阿片类药物的中位时间(IQR)为414(283597)vs.428(245552)分钟,中位差异(CI)为-14(-184-262)分钟,p = .32.结论:双侧腰方前导管持续输注不会延长选择性剖宫产术后首次使用阿片类药物的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anterior quadratus lumborum catheters for elective cesarean section: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Background: Optimizing pain management following cesarean section is crucial for the well-being of both mother and infant. Various types of quadratus lumborum blocks have exhibited reduced opioid consumption and pain scores after cesarean section. However, duration of block effect is relatively short. The aim of this study was to investigate the analgesic efficacy of the anterior quadratus lumborum catheters for cesarean section.

Methods: All 32 enrolled participants were allocated to postoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided anterior quadratus lumborum catheter placement with injection of 60 mL ropivacaine 0.375% after cesarean section. Randomization at 2 h resulted in either 60 mL ropivacaine 0.2% or 60 mL isotonic saline injected through the catheters, with subsequent 22-h infusion of either ropivacaine 0.2% or isotonic saline with an infusion rate of 4 mL h-1 per catheter. Participants in the active group received a total of 697 mg ropivacaine during the first 24 h. All participants received the standard postoperative multimodal pain regimen, and a final bilateral injection at 24-h post-catheter placement of 60 mL ropivacaine 0.375% in total. The primary outcome was time to first opioid administration. Secondary outcomes were pain scores, time to first ambulation, nausea and vomiting, accumulated opioid consumption, and catheter displacement rates.

Results: No significant intergroup differences were observed following the randomized intervention. Median time to first opioid (IQR) was (active vs. placebo) 414 (283, 597) vs. 428 (245, 552) minutes, with a median difference (CI) of -14 (-184 to 262) min, p = .32.

Conclusion: Bilateral anterior quadratus lumborum catheters with continuous infusion did not prolong time to first opioid after elective cesarean section.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
期刊最新文献
Effect of intraoperative methadone in robot-assisted cystectomy on postoperative opioid requirements: A randomized clinical trial. Epidural analgesia versus systemic opioids for postoperative pain management after VATS: Protocol for a systematic review. Time from pain assessment to opioid treatment in the Danish emergency departments-A multicenter cohort study. Viscoelastic testing of fibrinolytic capacity in acutely infected critically ill patients: Protocol for a scoping review. Does cytochrome 2D6 genotype affect the analgesic efficacy of codeine after ambulatory surgery? Prospective trial in 987 adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1