我们应该如何治疗手部疼痛敏感?一项国际e-Delphi研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.003
Andrea Hebert , Joy MacDermid , Jocelyn Harris , Tara Packham
{"title":"我们应该如何治疗手部疼痛敏感?一项国际e-Delphi研究。","authors":"Andrea Hebert ,&nbsp;Joy MacDermid ,&nbsp;Jocelyn Harris ,&nbsp;Tara Packham","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Evidence synthesis suggests allodynia resulting from </span>neuropathic pain<span> has few interventions with clear effectiveness. As research continues to build this needed evidence base, expert consensus recommendations can address the conflicting approaches within current hand therapy practice.</span></p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to develop consensus recommendations for the clinical management of allodynia from an international panel of hand therapists.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>This was an international e-Delphi survey study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We recruited international hand rehabilitation experts to participate in an e-Delphi survey. Consensus was defined as 75% or more of participants agreeing with a recommendation, and at least 3 rounds of consensus building were anticipated. Experts were identified from 21 countries, and clinical vignettes describing a spectrum of patients with painful sensitivity in the hand were provided to elicit treatment recommendations. Initial recommendations were summarized, and consensus sought for clinical practice recommendations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-eight participants were invited, with 44 more added through peer nominations. Fifty-four participants from 19 countries completed the initial survey and were invited to participate in all subsequent rounds. Over 900 treatment suggestions were provided from the initial vignettes across domains, including sensory, physical, and functional interventions, education, and cortical representation techniques: 46 ultimately reached consensus. However, important discrepancies in justification (eg, why allodynia should be covered) and implementation of techniques (eg, desensitization, sensory reeducation) were identified as the consensus exercise progressed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Experts recommend individually tailored programs to treat allodynia using a variety of physical/movement, sensory-based, and “top-down” approaches; this is highly aligned with contemporary theories, such as the Neuromatrix Model of Pain. However, consensus was not reached on the justification and implementation of some of these approaches, reflecting the lack of a taxonomy and supporting evidence for tactile stimulation approaches in the current literature. Trials directly comparing the effectiveness of these approaches are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How should we treat painful sensitivity in the hand? An international e-Delphi study\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Hebert ,&nbsp;Joy MacDermid ,&nbsp;Jocelyn Harris ,&nbsp;Tara Packham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Evidence synthesis suggests allodynia resulting from </span>neuropathic pain<span> has few interventions with clear effectiveness. As research continues to build this needed evidence base, expert consensus recommendations can address the conflicting approaches within current hand therapy practice.</span></p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to develop consensus recommendations for the clinical management of allodynia from an international panel of hand therapists.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>This was an international e-Delphi survey study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We recruited international hand rehabilitation experts to participate in an e-Delphi survey. Consensus was defined as 75% or more of participants agreeing with a recommendation, and at least 3 rounds of consensus building were anticipated. Experts were identified from 21 countries, and clinical vignettes describing a spectrum of patients with painful sensitivity in the hand were provided to elicit treatment recommendations. Initial recommendations were summarized, and consensus sought for clinical practice recommendations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-eight participants were invited, with 44 more added through peer nominations. Fifty-four participants from 19 countries completed the initial survey and were invited to participate in all subsequent rounds. Over 900 treatment suggestions were provided from the initial vignettes across domains, including sensory, physical, and functional interventions, education, and cortical representation techniques: 46 ultimately reached consensus. However, important discrepancies in justification (eg, why allodynia should be covered) and implementation of techniques (eg, desensitization, sensory reeducation) were identified as the consensus exercise progressed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Experts recommend individually tailored programs to treat allodynia using a variety of physical/movement, sensory-based, and “top-down” approaches; this is highly aligned with contemporary theories, such as the Neuromatrix Model of Pain. However, consensus was not reached on the justification and implementation of some of these approaches, reflecting the lack of a taxonomy and supporting evidence for tactile stimulation approaches in the current literature. Trials directly comparing the effectiveness of these approaches are needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001126\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:综合证据表明,神经性疼痛引起的异常性疼痛很少有明显有效的干预措施。随着研究继续建立这一所需的证据基础,专家一致建议可以解决当前手部治疗实践中相互矛盾的方法。目的:本研究旨在为国际手部治疗师小组对异常性疼痛的临床管理提出一致建议。研究设计:这是一项国际e-Delphi调查研究。方法:我们招募了国际手部康复专家参与e-Delphi调查。共识被定义为75%或75%以上的参与者同意一项建议,预计至少会有三轮共识建立。专家来自21个国家,并提供了描述一系列手部疼痛敏感患者的临床小插曲,以获得治疗建议。总结了初步建议,并就临床实践建议寻求共识。结果:68名与会者受到邀请,另有44人通过同行提名获得邀请。来自19个国家的54名参与者完成了初步调查,并被邀请参加随后的所有轮调查。从最初的小插曲中,跨领域提供了900多条治疗建议,包括感觉、身体和功能干预、教育和皮层表征技术:46条最终达成共识。然而,随着共识练习的进展,在证明理由(例如,为什么应该涵盖异常性疼痛)和技术实施(例如,脱敏、感觉再教育)方面存在重要差异。结论:专家们建议采用各种身体/运动、基于感觉和“自上而下”的方法,单独制定治疗异常性疼痛的方案;这与现代理论高度一致,例如疼痛的神经基质模型。然而,在其中一些方法的正当性和实施方面没有达成共识,这反映出当前文献中缺乏触觉刺激方法的分类法和支持证据。需要对这些方法的有效性进行直接比较的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How should we treat painful sensitivity in the hand? An international e-Delphi study

Background

Evidence synthesis suggests allodynia resulting from neuropathic pain has few interventions with clear effectiveness. As research continues to build this needed evidence base, expert consensus recommendations can address the conflicting approaches within current hand therapy practice.

Purpose

This study aimed to develop consensus recommendations for the clinical management of allodynia from an international panel of hand therapists.

Study Design

This was an international e-Delphi survey study.

Methods

We recruited international hand rehabilitation experts to participate in an e-Delphi survey. Consensus was defined as 75% or more of participants agreeing with a recommendation, and at least 3 rounds of consensus building were anticipated. Experts were identified from 21 countries, and clinical vignettes describing a spectrum of patients with painful sensitivity in the hand were provided to elicit treatment recommendations. Initial recommendations were summarized, and consensus sought for clinical practice recommendations.

Results

Sixty-eight participants were invited, with 44 more added through peer nominations. Fifty-four participants from 19 countries completed the initial survey and were invited to participate in all subsequent rounds. Over 900 treatment suggestions were provided from the initial vignettes across domains, including sensory, physical, and functional interventions, education, and cortical representation techniques: 46 ultimately reached consensus. However, important discrepancies in justification (eg, why allodynia should be covered) and implementation of techniques (eg, desensitization, sensory reeducation) were identified as the consensus exercise progressed.

Conclusions

Experts recommend individually tailored programs to treat allodynia using a variety of physical/movement, sensory-based, and “top-down” approaches; this is highly aligned with contemporary theories, such as the Neuromatrix Model of Pain. However, consensus was not reached on the justification and implementation of some of these approaches, reflecting the lack of a taxonomy and supporting evidence for tactile stimulation approaches in the current literature. Trials directly comparing the effectiveness of these approaches are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Force control of pinch grip: Normative data of a holistic evaluation. Digital wound assessment by hand specialists is moderately reliable. Dorsal blocking orthoses for proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate injuries: A retrospective cohort study investigating the impact of joint angle on patient outcomes. Understanding the implications of hand impairments in light of the International Classification of Function model. Virtual goniometric measurement of the forearm, wrist, and hand: A double-blind psychometric study of a digital goniometer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1